Exploring Student Communicative Needs and Learning Style Preferences in Thai EFL Secondary Classrooms for Differentiated Instruction Implementation
Abstract
This study investigated the implementation of differentiated instruction in Thai
EFL secondary
classrooms by examining students' communicative skill needs and identifying effective activities that
accommodate diverse learning preferences. Using a mixed methods approach, the research combined
learning style and learning preferences int erview data from Grade 9 students in a large lower secondary
school in the east of Thailand. The findings revealed that Thai EFL students require communicative skill
development emphasizing real world, functional language use rather than traditional gramma r focused
instruction. Students demonstrated strong preferences for interactive activities involving speaking, idea
exchange, and authentic communication. Their needs include developing fluency, critical reasoning,
organized expression, and confidence in p ublic speaking. These preferences challenge assumptions about
Thai students' comfort with passive learning and indicate readiness for communicative language teaching
when implemented through culturally responsive strategies. The study identified effective differentiated
instruction activities including movement based activities, debate exercises, collaborative structures, and
integration of authentic materials. These activities successfully accommodated multiple learning styles
while creating dynamic studen t centered environments. The research demonstrates that differentiated
instruction principles can be successfully integrated with communicative language teaching
methodologies to create more effective and inclusive EFL learning environments. The findings s uggest
that culturally responsive differentiated instruction can enhance educational effectiveness and support
communicative competence development that enables students to use English effectively in real world
contexts.
References
Ayana, H., Mereba, T., & Alemu, A. (2024). Effect of vocabulary learning strategies on students’ vocabulary
knowledge achievement and motivation: The case of grade 11 high school students. Frontiers in
Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1399350
Azimah, I., & Sujannah, W. D. (2024). The Effect of Differentiated Learning on EFL Students’ Reading
Skills . Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 937-946. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.473
Brookhart, S. M. (2024). Assessing communicative competence in English: A comprehensive guide. EFL
Cafe. https://eflcafe.net/communicative-competence-in-english-a-comprehensive-guide/
Cai, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Effects of mobile-supervised question-driven collaborative dialogues on EFL
learners' communication strategy use and academic oral English performance. Frontiers in
Psychology: Educational Psychology, 14, Article 1142651. https://doi.org/10.3389
/fpsyg.2023.1142651
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic
language learning approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
ปีที่ 12 ฉบับที่ 2 กรกฎาคม – ธันวาคม 2568 21
Chan, S. & Lo, N. (2024). Enhancing EFL/ESL instruction through gamification: A comprehensive review of
empirical evidence. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1395155. https://doi.org/10.3389
/feduc.2024.1395155
Gheyssens, E., Griful-Freixenet, J., & Struyven, K. (2023). Differentiated instruction as an approach to
establish effective teaching in inclusive classrooms. In R. Maulana, M. Michelle, & K. Robert (Eds.),
Effective teaching around the world (pp. 677–689). Springer.
Grecu, Y. V. (2023). Differentiated instruction: Curriculum and resources provide a roadmap to help English
teachers meet students' needs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, Article 104064.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104064
Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2012). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. SAGE
Publications.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.
Kotay-Nagy, A. (2023). Differentiated instruction in the EFL classroom: An interview study on
Hungarian primary and secondary school EFL teachers' views and self-reported practices. Journal
of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 6(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1556/
2023.00076
Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that
benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34-62.
Lee, T. Y., Ho, Y. C., & Chen, C. H. (2023). Integrating intercultural communicative competence into an
online EFL classroom: An empirical study of a secondary school in Thailand. Asian-Pacific Journal
of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00174-1
Liao, H., & Li, L. (2023). Facilitating EFL learners' intercultural competence through culturally responsive
teaching in oral English classrooms. System, 115, Article 103072. https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.system.2023.103072
Mardhatillah, M., & Suharyadi, S. (2023). Differentiated instruction: Challenges and opportunities in EFL
classroom. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 69-86.
https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1022
Pan, L., Ye, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Factors affecting Thai EFL students' behavioral intentions toward mobile-
assisted language learning. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1333771. https://doi.org/10.3389
/feduc.2024.1333771
Purnamaningwulan, R. A. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of differentiated instruction in EFL speaking
classes: A classroom action research study. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1),
-196. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25635
Qasserras, L. (2023). Systematic review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in language education: A
balanced perspective. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(6), 17-23.
https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.763
Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom
instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31-47.
ปีที่ 12 ฉบับที่ 2 กรกฎาคม – ธันวาคม 2568
Roy, A., Guay, F., & Valois, P. (2012). Teaching to address diverse learning needs: Development and
validation of a differentiated instruction scale. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(11), 1186-1204.
Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators' perceptions and use of differentiated
instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309-327.
Shafiei Rezvani Nejad, N. (2024). Differentiated instruction for English learners: Teachers' understanding and
practices. TESOL Journal, 15(4), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.817
Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Differentiation and the brain: How neuroscience supports the
learner-friendly classroom. Solution Tree Press.
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7),
-947.
Tajik, O., Noor, S., & Golzar, J. (2024). Investigating differentiated instruction and the contributing factors to
cater EFL students' needs at the collegial level. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00299-5
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.).
ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., Moon, T. R. & Imbeau, M. (2015). Assessment and student success in a differentiated
classroom. ASCD.
Watts-Taffe, S., Laster, B. P., Broach, L., Marinak, B., Connor, C. M., & Walker-Dalhouse, D. (2012).
Differentiated instruction: Making informed teacher decisions. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 303-
https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01126
Zhou, R., Samad, A. & Perinpasingam T. (2024). A systematic review of cross-cultural communicative
competence in EFL teaching: Insights from China. Humanities and Social Sciences
Communications, 11, Article 1750. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41599-024-04071-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Uttaradit Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความเป็นลิขสิทธิของคณะมส. มรภ อต.