The Characteristics of Physical Activities and Satisfaction toward Park Usage: Case Study in Chom Bueng Sub-District, Ratchaburi Province
Keywords:
Physical Activity, Satisfaction, Park, Chom BuengAbstract
This research aimed to study the characteristics of physical activities in the parks, along with attitudes, satisfaction, and evaluation of park usage in Chom Bueng Subdistrict. The case study included 2 target sites, i.e., Bueng Chom Bueng Park and Ratchapruek Health Park. 2 forms of survey and data collection were used as follows. 1) The system for observing play and recreation in communities (SOPARC) was used as a direct as well as systematic survey and observation tools to assess the usage parks and recreation. 2) Using the questionnaire for space assessment. According to the survey on opinions and attitudes toward the environment, it basically included space utilization, safety, activities, beauty, cleanness, travel, and facilities. The findings revealed that for physical activities in the parks in Chom Bueng Sub-district, light-intensity physical activities (LPA) were found most, followed by moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA). Sedentary behaviors were found least. And a very small number of childhood group users were found to none. For the attitudes of park users toward the benefits obtained from park usage, better emotions and mental health was found with the highest proportion. The mean of overall satisfaction toward Ratchapruek Health Park was Very satisfied. The mean of overall satisfaction toward Bueng Chom Bueng Park was Satisfied. The following is a summary of considerations for suggesting ways to improve the park area to promote physical activity: Provide spaces for physical activities that are appropriate for all age groups. That would provide space at all levels of physical activity. More specifically, moderate to vigorous physical activity may involve varying to promote physical activity for park users of all ages. It was suggested that additional research be conducted through SOPARC and a questionnaire. This will serve to explore the opinions and motivations of more specific and diversified groups of park users. Including focus group and stakeholder interviews for applications aimed at improving the park. This creates a built environment that can enhance the quality of life to be a better health domain.
References
- Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). “The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model”. American journal of preventive medicine, 28(2), 159-168.
- Best, JW. (1977). Research in Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
- Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2009). “Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science”. Am J Prev Med, 36(4 Suppl), S99-123.e112. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
- Chandrasiri, O., & Arifwidodo, S. D. (2015). Botbat lae kan phatthana phuenthi suan satharana suan lum phi ni krungthepmahanakhon. (In Thai [Characteristic of District Park Use for Physical Activity Promotion: Case study of Benjakitti Park, Bangkok, Thailand]. Retrieved June 29, 2021, from http://padatabase.net/uploads/files/01/doc/506_NCPA2015_p565-575.pdf
- Chandrasir, O., & Arifwidodo, S. (2017). “Inequality in Active Public Park: A Case Study of Benjakitti Park in Bangkok, Thailand”. Procedia Engineering, 198, 193-199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.083
- Cohen, D. A., et al. (2006). “Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls”. Pediatrics, 118(5), e1381-1389. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1226
- Ding Ding, & Klaus Gebel. (2012). “Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: What have we learned from reviewing the literature?”. Health & Place, 18(1), 100-105. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021.
- Google Earth. (2018). Tambon Chombueng. Retrieved July 27, 2021, from https://earth.google.com/earth/d/1oY0kc6INfxRg_Vdnl-j0gYP4enR7SXq_?usp=sharing
- Kaisornrat, S. (2016). “Naeothang kan phatthana kan thongthiao duai chakkrayan bon than sapphayakon thongthin chumchon Chom bueng changwat Ratchaburi”. (In Thai) “[Guidelines for Development of Using Bicycle Tourism Based on Local Resources Availability in Ratchaburi]”.In Rai-ngan suep nueangchak kan prachum wichakan radap chat ratchaphat muban chom bueng wichai khrang thi 4 pi 2559 [Proceedings of the 4th Muban Chombueng Rajabhat University’s Nation Conference 2016], 1458-1467.
- Klongvessa, N. (2001). Kan wangphaen lae okbaep suan satharana lae phuenthi nanthanakan. (In Thai) [Public Park and Recreation Area Planning and Design]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
- Kostrzewska, M. (2017). “Activating Public Space: How to Promote Physical Activity in Urban Environment”. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245, 052074. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/245/5/052074
- Lindberg, M., & Schipperijn, J. (2015). “Active use of urban park facilities – Expectations versus reality”. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 909-918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.007
- Luecha, T., & Bunluea, T. (2013). “Phuenthi nanthanakan thi mosom khong nisit thiyu asai nai phuenthi doi rop mahawitthayalai maha sarakham khet
phuenthi kham riang. (In Thai) [Recreation Areas for Collegiate Student in The Vicinity of Mahasarakham University (Khamriang Campus)]”. Warasan kanmueang kan pokkhrong. [Journal of Politics and Governance], 3(2), 160-175.
- Mutdeth, A., et al. (2018). “Sakkayaphap thang nanthanakan khong suan satharana nai khet krungthepmahanakhon. (In Thai) [The Recreational Potential of Public Parks in Bangkok]”. Warasan wichakan mahawitthayalai ratchaphat Phuket. [Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal], 14(2), 1-19.
- National Recreation and Park Association. (n.d.). Creating Safe Park Environ ments to Enhance Community Wellness. Retrieved October 5, 2021, from https://www.nrpa.org/contentassets/f768428a39aa4035ae55b2aaff372617/park-safety.pdf
- Physical Activity and Health, Division Department of Health. (2014). Khumue ken mattrathan suan satharana phuea kan okkamlangkai. (in Thai) [Active Public Park Standard Manual]. Bangkok: ACFT, Ltd.
- Sompong, C., & Khongouan, W. (2015). “Botbat lae kan phatthana phuenthi suan satharana suan lum phi ni krungthepmahanakhon. (In Thai) [The Role of Lumpini Park, Bangkok, and Its Developing Plan]”. Warasan Wichakan Khana Sathapattayakamsat Socholo. [Journal of the Faculty of Architecture King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang], 12(1), 56-69.
- Songthummin, N., et al. (2010). “Kwam khithen to kan phatthana suan satharana thung simueang khong prachachon nai khet thetsaban nakhon Udon Thani. (In Thai) [Opinions of People in Udonthani Municipality Towards the Development of Tung Srimuang Public Park]”. Sak Thong: Warasan manutsat lae sangkhomsat mahawitthayalai ratchaphat kamphaeng phet. [The Golden Teak: Humanity and Social Science Journal], 16(1), 103-117.
- Tangkijngamwong, O., et al. (2015). Kan sangket pharuetikam phuchai suan satharana phuea pramoen radap kitchakam thang kai lae khwam samphan khong phuenthi kitchakam thang kai kap laksana thang kaiyaphap khong suan luang rachini (19 rai) amphoe hua hin changwat prachuap khiri khan. (In Thai) [Identifying Park-Related Physical Activity and Its Association with Physical Environment: A Case Study of Queen’s Park (19 Rai) Hua Hin, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province]. Retrieved June 15, 2021, from http://padatabase.net/uploads/files/01/doc/503_NCPA2015_p489-507.pdf
- Veitch, J., et al. (2014). “A natural experiment to examine the impact of park renewal on park-use and park-based physical activity in a disadvantaged neighbourhood: The REVAMP study methods”. BMC public health, 14, 600. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-600
- Weluwanarak, S., & Bejrananda, M. (2019). “Kansueksa pharuetikam kan chai phuenthi satharana nai khet mueang khong phu sung-ayu korani sueksa khet thetsaban nakhon Khon kaen. (In Thai) [The Study of Elderly Behavior in Urban Public Space Using Case Study Khonkaen Municipal Area]”. In Rai-ngan Kan Prachum Wichakan Sanoe Phonngan Wichai Radap Bandit Sueksa Haeng Chat Khrang Thi 20 [Proceedings of the 20th National Graduate Research Conference], 1550-1560.
