Guidelines for Enhancing the Operation of the Centers for Quality of Life Development and Career Promotion for the Elderly
Keywords:
Older Persons, Performance enhancement, Quality of lifeAbstract
Since the establishment of the Centers for Quality of Life Development and Career Promotion for the Elderly (the Centers) in 2014, no systematic studies have been conducted on their operations. This research paper aims to: first, present the background and policies of the Centers; second, examine the roles, duties, and operations of related agencies; third, explore the problems and obstacles in the Centers' operations; and fourth, provide recommendations for enhancing these operations. The authors employed a mixed research method, gathering data from in-depth interviews and using questionnaires to collect opinions from the elderly about the Centers' functioning. The research findings indicate that the Centers, initiated by the government's policy, serve as hubs for organizing various activities for local elders, aiming to promote, care for, and improve their quality of life both in the short and long term. The Department of Elderly Affairs, responsible for policy implementation, coordinates with the Provincial Office of Social Development and Human Security and local administrative organizations to supervise the establishment and operation of the Centers. Major problems and obstacles include misconceptions among the elderly about the Centers' roles and responsibilities, lack of emphasis on the qualifications of local administrative organizations and the potential of personnel, budgetary and staffing constraints, inadequate monitoring and evaluation of the Centers' performance, and limited continuity and sustainability in their operations. Recommendations for enhancing the operations of the Centers include: 1) The Department of Elderly Affairs should build a cooperation network to drive the Center's initiatives; 2) It should focus on monitoring and evaluating the Center's performance and use these assessments to develop operational standards; 3) It should systematically prepare and develop personnel for future responsibilities related to the Center; and 4) It should consider upgrading the Center to become a comprehensive service center for the elderly.
References
Anderson, J. E. (2015). Public policymaking: an introduction. (8th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth.
Chareonsook, D. (2015). Aging and Community Health Promotion. Journal of The Police Nurses, 7(2), 280-265. (in Thai)
Chen, T. H. (2015). Practical program evaluation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Faikam, K. (2014). Elderly Welfare Management in Thailand. Ph.d in Social Sciences Journal, 4(3), 92-99. (in Thai)
National Committee on Aging. (2010). National Elderly Plan No. 2 (B.E. 2545 - 2021) Revised No. 1 B.E. 2552. Bangkok: Thep Penvanis Publishing. (in Thai)
National Committee on Aging. (2018). National Elderly Plan No. 2 (2002 – 2021) Revised No. 2 B.E. 2018. Bangkok: Samlada Printing. (in Thai)
Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health. (2017). Guide to Integration of the 4 Ministries Cooperation – Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security, Ministry of Education, and Ministry of Public Health, The Development of People Throughout Their Life Span During Old Age. Ministry of Public Health. Bangkok. (in Thai)
Peerayanun, C., & Pattaranarakul, P. (2016). Study of policies and strategic measures for welfare to support the Thai aging society. The SDU research journal on Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(3), 19-37. (in Thai)
Phiboon, K., Piriyapan, P., Phitaksil, M., & Injai, P. (2014). Round-trip service arrangement for seniors in Burapha University Hospital. Retrieved from http://dspace.lib.buu.ac.th/xmlui/handle/1234567890/1668 (in Thai)
Prompak, C. (2013). Aging society in Thailand. Retrieved from https://library.senate.go.th/document/Ext6078/6078440_0002.PDF?fbclid=IwAR0JwyjsURt0lYC_0C-JHTJz_LBhuoffm0lPAEaZeA-DpUdX6sqTTrAjEmw (in Thai)
Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E. & Lipsey, M.W. (1998). Evaluation a systematic approach. (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation (pp. 279-317). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
The Department of Elderly Affairs. (2017). Standard Operating Guide of Life Quality Development and Profession Promotion Centers for Older Persons. Bangkok: The Department of Elderly Affairs. (in Thai)
The Department of Elderly Affairs. (2018). Measures to drive the national agenda on aging society. Samlada Printing House. (in Thai)
The Department of Elderly Affairs. (2021). Care for the elderly. Retrieved from https://www.dop.go.th/th/know/15/741 (in Thai)
The Department of Elderly Affairs. (2022). Numbers of Life Quality Development and Profession Promotion Centers for Older Persons in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.dop.go.th/th/formdownload/7/809 (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Local Administration Journal
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the Local Administration Journalis owned by the College of Local Administration, Khon Kaen University.