Moral Entrepreneurship of Administrators Affecting the Corporate Social Responsibility of Schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area 31
Keywords:
Moral Entrepreneurship, Corporate Social ResponsibilityAbstract
The purposes of the research were to study the moral entrepreneurship of administrators which affect the corporate social responsibility of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 31. The samples group was consisted of 44 schools of 2563 academic year. The multiple regression analysis found that the moral entrepreneurship of administrators had a statistically significant effect on the corporate social responsibility of the school. There are two aspects as followed; 1) capability for moral entrepreneurship (X3) and 2) vision on moral entrepreneurship (X2). These factors could predict 47.40% and raw score predictive equation is = 1.889 + 0.376X3 + 0.206X2, standardized score predictive equation is = 0.441 + 0.268 .
References
Office of the Education Council Secretariat. Research report, approaches to the development of Thai education and the preparation of the 21st century. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council Secretariat; 2014. Thai.
Ministry of Education. Announcement of the Ministry of Education on the policy and focus of Ministry of Education, Fiscal Year 2021; 2019. Thai.
Bevan S, Isles N, Emery P, Hoskins T. Achieving high performance: CSR at the heart of business. London: The Work Foundation; 2004.
Porter ME, Kramer MR. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review. 2006; 84(12): 78-92.
Schaltegger S, Burritt R. Corporate Sustainability. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T, editors. The International yearbook of environmental and resource economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2005.
The NETWORK. Research report on CSR development in Thailand and the role of volunteering (translated version). Bangkok: The NETWORK; 2009. Thai.
Office of the Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public organization). National Education Act 1999, Amendment (2nd Edition), 2002. Bangkok: Prigwhan Graphics; 2004. Thai.
Office of the National Education Commission. Revised National Education Plan (2009-2016). Bangkok: Office of Supervision and Education Standard Development; 2017. Thai.
International Standard ISO 26000. Guidance on social responsibility. Switzerland; 2010.
Kaewdang R. Juristic School. Bangkok: Wattanapanich; 2003. Thai.
Phengsawat W. The Structural Equation Modeling of Administrations’ Leadership Effectiveness in Influencing on the School Effectiveness [PhD thesis]. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University; 2006. Thai.
Chinwanno W. Professional ethics. Bangkok: Chuan Pim Printing House; 2003. Thai.
Becker H. Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe; 1963.
Kaptein M. The Moral Entrepreneur: A New Component of Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017; (156): 1135–1150.
Yurtsever G. Measuring the moral entrepreneurial personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2003; 31(1): 1–12.
Carroll AB. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review. 1979; 4(4): 497-505.
Fishman JP. Copyright infringement and the separated powers of moral entrepreneurship. American Criminal Law Review. 2014; (51): 359–401.
Nonthnathorn P. Corporate social responsibility management: creating a sustainable competitive advantage. Nonthaburi: Think beyond book; 2010. Thai.
Li Y, Fu H, Huang S. Does conspicuous decoration style influence customer's intention to purchase? The moderating effect of CSR practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2015; (15): 19-29.
Sanmanoch A. Corporate Social Responsibility of School Administrators under the Office of Basic Educational Area 2, Pathum Thani Province [Med thesis]. Pathum Thani: Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University Under The Royal Patronage; 2014. Thai.
Kulkrong U. Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility of School Administrators [Med thesis]. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University; 2010. Thai.
Chantasongkram V. Self-awareness in Social Responsibility of School Administrators under the Office of Basic Educational Area 2, Kalasin Province [Med thesis]. Mahasarakham: Rajaphat Mahasarakham University; 2006. Thai.
Nonthnathorn P. LIFE Model. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Social Enterprise Leadership Center; 2015. Thai.
Waldman DA. Best Practices in Leading at Strategic Levels: A Social Responsibility Perspective. In: Conger JA, Riggio RE, editors. The Practice of Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
Somprach K. Educational Leadership. Khon Kaen: Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University; 2003. Thai.
Smith AW. Leadership: Developing leaders and organizations. Updating School Board Policies. 1993; 24(2): 1–4.
Starratt RJ. Moral dimensions of leadership. In: Begley BT, P. E. Leonard PE, editors. The values of educational administration. London: Falmer Press; 1999. p.23-25.
Kaptein M. The Battle for Business Ethics: A Struggle Theory. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017; (144): 343-361.
Rest JR. Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger; 1986.
Brown ME, Treviño LK, Harrison DA. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2005; 97(2): 117–134.
Butterfield KD, Treviño LK, Weaver GR. Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations. 2000; 53(7): 981–1018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
