The Results of Instructional Model Development Enhancing Critical Reading, Critical Writing and Self-Regulation Learning in English of Grade 9 Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aimed to 1) compare the ability of critical reading, critical writing, and self-regulation in English of Grade 9 students before and after taught by PTK Model and 2) compare the ability of critical reading, critical writing, and self-regulation in English of Grade 9 students after taught by normally learning and by PTK Model. The research model was experimental research. The samples were two classes of Grade 9 students from two Educational Opportunity Extension Schools by Simple Random and select the sample group. The instruments for collecting data were Instructional Model; English lesson plans; test of the ability on the English critical reading; test of the ability on the English critical writing; subjective test of self-regulation learning for knowledge and learning process aspect and questionnaire test of self-regulation learning. An analysis of data using the statistical mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The results showed that:
1. The Grade 9 students who were taught using the PTK model had higher scores in English critical reading, English critical writing, and self-regulation learning after studying than before, with statistically significant at the .05 level
2. The Grade 9 students who taught using the PTK model had higher scores in English critical reading, English critical writing, the subjective test of self-regulation learning for knowledge, the learning process aspect, and the questionnaire test of self-regulation learning for self-efficacy aspect after studying than students who taught normally teaching.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2556). การสร้างการเรียนรู้สู่ศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิสยามกัมมาจล.
Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 829-835.
Burden, P.R., & Byrd, D.M. (2010). Methods for effective teaching: meeting the needs of all students. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Christie, M., Carey, M., Robertson, A. & Grainger, P. (2015). Putting transformative learning theory into practice. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 9-30.
Duffy, T.M., & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implication for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. pp. 170-195. in D. H. Jonassen (ed.). Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
Flavell, J.H. (1979). The Development of Metacommunication. Paper presented at the Twenty–First International Congress of Psychology, Paris.
Graves. M.F., Juel C., & Graves. M.F. (2004). Teaching Reading in the 21st Century. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23–59.
Kruse, K. (2008). Introduction to Instructional Design and the ADDIE Model. Retrieved from https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/CTDN/TtT2015/ttt2015module5IntroInstDesignADDIEpdf.pdf
Lewis, M. (2008). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Zrinski, D.D: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Marzano, R.J. (2000). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press.
Mezirow, J.D. & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Rotherham, A., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1). 16-21.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2002). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.