The Results of Instructional Model Development Enhancing Critical Reading, Critical Writing and Self-Regulation Learning in English of Grade 9 Students

Main Article Content

Witthawin Pratangkati
Pijitra Thongpanich
Sarith Sri-Kao

Abstract

This research article aimed to 1) compare the ability of critical reading, critical writing, and self-regulation in English of Grade 9 students before and after taught by PTK Model and 2) compare the ability of critical reading, critical writing, and self-regulation in English of Grade 9 students after taught by normally learning and by PTK Model. The research model was experimental research. The samples were two classes of Grade 9 students from two Educational Opportunity Extension Schools by Simple Random and select the sample group. The instruments for collecting data were Instructional Model; English lesson plans; test of the ability on the English critical reading; test of the ability on the English critical writing; subjective test of self-regulation learning for knowledge and learning process aspect and questionnaire test of self-regulation learning. An analysis of data using the statistical mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The results showed that:


1. The Grade 9 students who were taught using the PTK model had higher scores in English critical reading, English critical writing, and self-regulation learning after studying than before, with statistically significant at the .05 level


2. The Grade 9 students who taught using the PTK model had higher scores in English critical reading, English critical writing, the subjective test of self-regulation learning for knowledge, the learning process aspect, and the questionnaire test of self-regulation learning for self-efficacy aspect after studying than students who taught normally teaching.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pratangkati, W., Thongpanich , P. ., & Sri-Kao, S. . (2022). The Results of Instructional Model Development Enhancing Critical Reading, Critical Writing and Self-Regulation Learning in English of Grade 9 Students. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 1829–1844. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/261969
Section
Research Articles

References

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2556). การสร้างการเรียนรู้สู่ศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิสยามกัมมาจล.

Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 829-835.

Burden, P.R., & Byrd, D.M. (2010). Methods for effective teaching: meeting the needs of all students. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Christie, M., Carey, M., Robertson, A. & Grainger, P. (2015). Putting transformative learning theory into practice. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 9-30.

Duffy, T.M., & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implication for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. pp. 170-195. in D. H. Jonassen (ed.). Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.

Flavell, J.H. (1979). The Development of Metacommunication. Paper presented at the Twenty–First International Congress of Psychology, Paris.

Graves. M.F., Juel C., & Graves. M.F. (2004). Teaching Reading in the 21st Century. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23–59.

Kruse, K. (2008). Introduction to Instructional Design and the ADDIE Model. Retrieved from https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/CTDN/TtT2015/ttt2015module5IntroInstDesignADDIEpdf.pdf

Lewis, M. (2008). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Zrinski, D.D: Heinle, Cengage Learning.

Marzano, R.J. (2000). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press.

Mezirow, J.D. & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Rotherham, A., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1). 16-21.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.

Zimmerman, M. A. (2002). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.