A Study on Chinese Students' Aesthetic Experience and Musical Creativity

Main Article Content

Zeng Qing-xia
Chen Nai-liang

Abstract

The inclusion of aesthetic experience as the independent variable, learning attitude and self-efficacy as mediating variables, and musical creativity as the dependent variable in the study of Chinese music majors is deemed critical as it sheds light on the intricate relationship between these factors. Aesthetic experience is considered a crucial factor in the development of musical creativity as it can shape one's learning attitudes and self-efficacy. By examining the mediating role of learning attitudes and self-efficacy in the relationship between aesthetic experience and musical creativity, this study provides valuable insights into the process by which musical creativity is fostered among music majors. The results of this study have the potential to contribute to the advancement of the current understanding of the interplay between aesthetic experience, learning attitudes, self-efficacy, and musical creativity in the development of musical talent.


This study employed the questionnaire survey method and analyzed the data from 778 valid samples. The findings of this study indicate a positive correlation between students' understanding of aesthetics and their complete aesthetic experience and learning attitude. Furthermore, students' aesthetic attitude, understanding of aesthetics, and overall experience were found to have a positive impact on their musical creativity, with learning attitude serving as a mediating factor between the three. Based on these findings, the following recommendations are proposed: 1) Cultivating students' aesthetic attitudes and understanding of aesthetics to enhance their belief in creative thinking; 2) improving students' creative intention to increase their aesthetic pleasure; 3) enhancing students' creative ability to promote a more complete aesthetic experience; 4) strengthening students' belief in their creative thinking and products to improve their creative performance; and 5) encouraging teachers to foster positive learning attitudes among students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Qing-xia, Z., & Nai-liang, C. (2023). A Study on Chinese Students’ Aesthetic Experience and Musical Creativity. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(3), 1112–1131. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/263192
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Zeng Qing-xia, International College, Krirk University, Thailand

 

 

Chen Nai-liang, International College, Krirk University, Thailand

 

 

References

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-372.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and Innovation in Organizations (Vol. 5). Boston: Harvard Business School.

Arora, R. (1982). Validation of an SOR model for situation, enduring, and response components of involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 505-516.

Bačlija Sušić, B., & Brebrić, V. (2022). Encouraging and assessing preschool children’s musical creativity.

Early Years, 18(4), 1-13.

Baltzer, S. (1988). A validation study of a measure of musical creativity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36(4), 232-249.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1994). Social Cognitive Theory Springer. Boston, MA.

Barrett, K. C., & Limb, C. J. (2019). Unveiling artistic minds: case studies of creativity. Current Opinion in

Behavioral Sciences, 27(2), 84-89.

Camic, P. M., Crutch, S. J., Murphy, C., Firth, N. C., Harding, E., Harrison, C. R., & Zeilig, H. (2018). Conceptualising and understanding artistic creativity in the dementias: Interdisciplinary approaches to research and practise. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(3), 18-42.

Capar, G. & Tarim, K. (2015). Efficacy of the cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement

and attitude: A meta-analysis research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 553-559.

Chang, Y. C., & Jaisook, N. (2020). Differences in the influence of aesthetic experience on the innovative

behaviors of Thai students and Chinese international students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 93-112.

Chen, X. C., Wu, Z. K., & Wan, H. Y. (2018). The influence of classroom leadership style of college teachers on students' creative self-efficacy. Chinese Adult Education, 20(6), 53-57.

Chmelarova, Z., Pasiar, L., & Vargová, D. (2020). The level of student’s creativity and their attitude to the project-based learning. J. Educ. Sci. Psychol, 10(3), 3-15.

Civitarese, G. (2017). Sublime Subjects: Aesthetic Experience and Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis.

Routledge.

Dewey, J., & Authentic, I. E. L. (1938). Experiential Learning. Pentice Hall.

Fenner, D. E. (2003). Aesthetic experience and aesthetic analysis. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 12(4),

-53.

Foster, C., Breckons, M., Cotterell, P., Barbosa, D., Calman, L., Corner, J., & Smith, P. W. (2015). Cancer

survivors’ self-efficacy to self-manage in the year following primary treatment. Journal of Cancer

Survivorship, 9(1), 11-19.

Guilford, J. P. (2017). Creativity: A Quarter Century of Progress. Routledge.

Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1-16.

Hagman, G. (2010). The Artist's Mind: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Creativity, Modern Art and Modern Artists. Routledge.

Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Ceretkova, S., Černochová, M., Sendova, E., & Tienken, C. H.

(2018). Creativity and technology in education: An international perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 409-424.

Kim, S. H., & Park, J. (2021). A study on intention to solve the problem via the prior experience of

creativity programs based on the action learning methodology. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(6), 73-83.

Lin, S. Q. (2009). The Enlightenment of Aesthetic Experience to the Construction of Curriculum Aesthetics. Donghai Education Review, 3(3), 43-70.

Loui, P. (2018). Rapid and flexible creativity in musical improvisation: Review and a model. Annals of the

New York Academy of Sciences, 14(1), 138-145.

MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms,

and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542-555.

Mo, J. F. (2019). How a world-class university fosters college students' creativity through diverse learning experiences. Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University, 18(2), 57-67.

Odena, O. (2018). Musical Creativity Revisited: Educational Foundations, Practices and Research. Routledge.

Polymeropoulou, M. (2018). Digital Music Creativity: Chipmusic from Greece. Routledge.

Ramdani, Z., Hadiana, D., Amri, A., Warsihna, J., Widodo, W., Chandra, D. T., & Sopandi, E. (2022). The

mediating role of attitude in the correlation between creativity and curiosity regarding the performance of outstanding science teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 85-99.

Redies, C. (2015). Combining universal aesthetic and cultural context in a unifying model of visual

aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(2), 218-231.

Reybrouck, M., Vuust, P., Brattico, E., & IntechOpen. (2018). Music and brain plasticity: How sounds

trigger neurogenerative adaptations. Neuroplasticity Insights of Neural Reorganization, 8(5), 25-37.

Runco, M. A. & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Primary and secondary creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral

Sciences, 27(2), 27-40.

Savaş, E. B., Verwijmeren, T., & van Lier, R. (2021). Aesthetic experience and creativity in interactive art.

Art & Perception, 9(2), 167-198.

Schiller, F., & Snell, R. (2004). On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Courier Corporation.

Shahab, Y., Chengang, Y., Arbizu, A. D., & Haider, M. J. (2018). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: Do entrepreneurial creativity and education matter?. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(3), 237-251.

Shao, C. Y. (2021). Can students’ aesthetic experience be evaluated: The path and criticism of qualitative

change experience evaluation. Educational Development Research, 41(22), 83-92.

Silva, R. S. R. (2020). On music production in mathematics teacher education as an aesthetic experience.

ZDM, 52(5), 973-987.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to

creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.

Van de Cruys, S., Bervoets, J., & Moors, A. (2021). Preferences need inferences: Learning, valuation, and

curiosity in aesthetic experience. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175.

Wang, L. G. (2019). Research on the relationship between innovative spirit, social self-efficacy and learning motivation of vocational students: Based on the empirical research of vocational colleges

in Guangxi. Vocational Education Forum, 19(3), 16-23.

Wanzer, D. L., Finley, K. P., Zarian, S., & Cortez, N. (2020). Experiencing flow while viewing art: Development of the aesthetic experience questionnaire. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and

the Arts, 14(1), 113-128.

Watson, J.B. & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. J Exp Psychol, 3(1), 1-14.

Zhang, Y.C. (2015). Research on Students' Aesthetic Experience, Creative Self-efficacy and Creativity:

Multi-level Moderated Mediating Effects of Teachers' Creativity Teaching (PhD Thesis), National Tainan University.

Zhang, Y.C., & Xiao, J.C. (2016). Students' aesthetic experience, creative self-efficacy and creativity:

Does teacher creativity teaching work?. Educational Practice and Research, 29(2), 65-104.

Qi, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). A talent cultivation model for improving the innovation ability of college students in scientific research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(18), 151-164.