Voluntary Carbon Market in Local Community: Opportunities, Roles, and Linkages with Sustainable Tourism
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article proposes the LEAF Model as an integrated conceptual framework for enhancing the capacity of local communities to participate in voluntary carbon markets. The model consists of four key components: 1) Local Empowerment, which focuses on strengthening community knowledge and capacity; 2) Emission Measurement, which emphasizes standardized measurement and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions; 3) Accreditation and Standardization, which facilitates access to credible certification systems and recognized standards; and 4) Fair Carbon Trade, which ensures transparent and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms derived from carbon credits. Integrating the LEAF model into local policy frameworks and development planning—particularly in ecotourism destinations or communities with significant natural resource capital—can support the development of a green economy that effectively links greenhouse gas mitigation with the long-term sustainability of local communities.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
กลไกลดก๊าซเรือนกระจก. (1 เมษายน 2564). ประเภทโครงการ T VER. สืบค้นจาก https://ghgreduction.tgo.or.th/th/about-tver/tver-type.html
กลไกลดก๊าซเรือนกระจก. (25 มกราคม 2565). การขึ้นทะเบียนและรับรองปริมาณก๊าซเรือนกระจก. สืบค้นจาก https://ghgreduction.tgo.or.th/th/other-rule/tver-criteria-for-registration?format=html
องค์การบริหารจัดการก๊าซเรือนกระจก. (24 ธันวาคม 2567). รายงานสถานการณ์และแนวโน้มตลาดคาร์บอนภาคสมัครใจประเทศไทย ปี 2567. สืบค้นจาก https://carbonmarket.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=ZG93bmxvYWQ=&action=ZGV0YWls¶m=Mzk=
องค์การบริหารจัดการก๊าซเรือนกระจก. (11 พฤศจิกายน 2568). รายงานสำรวจตลาดคาร์บอนภาคสมัครใจประเทศไทย ปี 2568. สืบค้นจาก https://carbonmarket.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=ZG93bmxvYWQ=&action=ZGV0YWls¶m=NDg=
Amador, M. (2023). Building carbon credits in the voluntary market: A viewpoint. Revista Agro, 1(1), 1-19. Retrieved from https://revistas.utn.ac.cr/index.php/agro/article/view/670/1104
Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016). Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00470
Haya, B., Cullenward, D., Strong, A. L., Grubert, E., Heilmayr, R., Sivas, D. A., & Wara, M. (2020). Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: insights from California’s standardized approach. Climate Policy, 20(9), 1112–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1781035
Jindal, R., Kerr, J., & Nagar. S. (2007). Voluntary Carbon Trading: Potential for Community Forestry Projects in India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 14(2), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.18356/7fbaed19-en
International Carbon Reduction and Offset Alliance. (2025). ICROA code of best practice (v2.6.3). Retrieved from https://icroa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ICROA_Code_Best_Practice_v2.6.3_12.2025.pdf
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (H. Lee & J. Romero, Eds.). https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
Lenzen, M., Sun, Y. Y., Faturay, F., Ting, Y. P., Geschke, A., & Malik, A. (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x
Meitner, M. (2024). Governance challenges in voluntary carbon markets: The community-level implications. Environmental Policy and Practice, 26(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpolp.2024.01.004
Ostrom, E. (2015). Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pabolu, V. (28 July 2025). With a pilot, NABARD taps into carbon credit market in Karnataka. The Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/with-a-pilot-nabard-taps-into-carbon-credit-market-in-karnataka/articleshow/122955955.cms
Peskett, L., Huberman, D., Bowen-Jones, E., Edwards, G., & Brown, J. (2008). Making REDD work for the poor. London: Poverty Environment Partnership.
Schneider, L., & La Hoz Theuer, S. (2019). Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 19(3), 386-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332
Schneider, L., & Kollmuss, A. (2015). Perverse incentives under the CDM: An evaluation of HFC-23 destruction projects. Climate Policy, 15(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/146930 62.2014.997621
Schreiber, H. (2013). The voluntary carbon market and business innovation for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/1432259f-a025-4a6a-b89d-c3097ad16068/content
Setzer, J., & Higham, C. (25 June 2025). Global trends in climate change litigation: 2025 snapshot. Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Global-Trends-in-Climate-Change-Litigation-2025-Snapshot.pdf
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2022). Final report – Promoting transformational change through carbon markets (Report). Retrieved from https://unepccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/final-report-published-sep-2022.pdf
World Bank. (2023). State and trends of carbon pricing 2023: International carbon markets. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/40700
World Tourism Organization. (2023). Climate action in the tourism sector: An overview of methodologies and tools to measure greenhouse gas emissions. Madrid: UNWTO.
Zhou, C., Chen, H., Wang, S., Sun, X., El Saddik, A., & Cai, W. (2023). Harnessing Web3 on carbon offset market for sustainability: framework and a case study. IEEE Wireless Communications, 30(5), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.02039