A Structural Model of Chinese Idiom Competence among Second Language Learners
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to study 1) the reliability and validity of the measurement scales of perceived semantic transparency, intercultural sensitivity, learning engagement, cognitive strategy use, and perceived idiomatic competence; 2) the differences in these variables across demographic characteristics; and 3) the structural relationships among these variables in second language learning. The sample consisted of 205 international students learning Chinese as a second language, selected through convenience sampling in university contexts. The instrument used for collecting data was a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability and validity testing, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). The research results were as follows: 1) All measurement scales demonstrated strong reliability and validity; the constructs of perceived semantic transparency, intercultural sensitivity, learning engagement, cognitive strategy use, and perceived idiom competence were measured consistently and accurately. 2) Gender differences were observed in intercultural sensitivity, with male learners scoring higher, and students from non-Chinese majors reporting higher levels of learning engagement. 3) SEM results revealed a structured mechanism in which perceived semantic transparency significantly influenced learning engagement and cognitive strategy use, learning engagement further promoted cognitive strategy use, and cognitive strategy use directly predicted perceived idiom competence. Intercultural sensitivity also showed both indirect effects through engagement and strategy use and a direct effect on perceived idiom competence. These findings contribute to second language acquisition research by demonstrating that idiom competence develops through an integrated process in which cultural awareness and linguistic perception are transformed into competence via engagement and strategic processing.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Aldawsari, M. M., Alenezi, A. D., & Liontas, J. I. (2025). AI and Idioms: Enhancing Idiomatic Competence in EFL through ChatGPT. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 25(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1472571
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000050
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2020). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63(1), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918823230
Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, (3). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED447525
Cong-Lem, N. (2025). Intercultural communication in second/foreign language education over 67 years: A bibliometric review. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2025.2456265
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Hubers, F., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2020). Second language learner intuitions of idiom properties: What do they tell us about L2 idiom knowledge and acquisition?. Lingua, 246, 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102940
Liu, D. (2017). Idioms: Description, comprehension, acquisition, and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Liu, T. H., & Su, L. I. W. (2021). Chinese idioms as constructions: Frequency, semantic transparency and their processing. Language and Linguistics, 22(4), 558-592. https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00091.liu
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Peng, A. C., Van Dyne, L., & Oh, K. (2015). The influence of motivational cultural intelligence on cultural effectiveness based on study abroad: The moderating role of participant’s cultural identity. Journal of Management Education, 39(5), 572-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914555717
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
Senkbeil, K. (2020). Idioms in intercultural communication: A cognitive and pragmatic perspective. International Journal of Language and Culture, 7(1), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00026.sen
Solodka, A., Filatova, O., Hinkevych, O., & Spanatiy, O. (2021). Cross-Cultural Language Learning: Interpretative Engagement. Arab World English Journal, 12(3), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no3.6
Soto-Sierra, V., & Ferreira, R. A. (2024). The influence of cross-language similarity and transparency on idiom knowledge in non-immersed L2 speakers. System, 122, 103287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103287
Vivas, J., Vivas, L., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A., & Vorano, A. (2017). Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0777-2
Weda, S., Atmowardoyo, H., Samad, I. A., Fitriani, S. S., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2022). Measuring intercultural sensitivity of English language students at a higher education institution in Indonesia. TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture and Education, 2(2), 158-168. https://doi.org/10.54923/transkata.v2i2.74
Wilczewski, M., Wang, R., Du, J., Søderberg, A. M., Giuri, P., Mughan, T., ... & Jacob, M. J. (2023). Cultural novelty and international students’ experience: A five-country study. Higher Education, 86(5), 1107-1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00964-z