Correspondence Correlation of Word Order: A Case Study on RelN and NRel

Main Article Content

Bin Zhu
Tong Wu
Phacharaphon Chuenchit

Abstract

This paper introduces a new quantitative approach to word order typology, centering on the arrangement of the relative clause (Rel) and the head noun (N) as the foundational element. Using a sample of 17 different orders, we calculate conditional percentages – called “linearization correspondences” – that link RelN and NRel to the preferred orders of other constructions (such as OV/VO, subordinator placement, and adjective-noun order) and vice versa. From these calculations, we derive linear, inverse, total, and partial correspondences, producing a comprehensive hierarchy of co-occurring orders. We argue that diachronic change reflects a balance between a bridge effect, which facilitates RelN ↔ NRel shifts, and a mirror-image effect, which stabilizes correlated clusters – a tension illustrated by patterns in both Chinese and cross-linguistic contexts and further examined through a case study of Chinese in the Introduction and Section 5. Additionally, the method applies beyond relatives to head-modifier orders, where it reveals strong correlations. The findings shed light on pathways of grammaticalization and provide predictive constraints for typological universals, while also offering a replicable analytical toolkit for investigating word order evolution across human languages.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zhu, B., Wu , T. ., & Chuenchit, P. (2026). Correspondence Correlation of Word Order: A Case Study on RelN and NRel . Language and Linguistics, 44(1), 37–71. https://doi.org/10.64731/langling.v44i1.286506
Section
Research Articles

References

Austin, P. (2022). A semantic and pragmatic explanation of harmony. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 54(1), 1-23.

Dryer, M. S. (2007). Word order. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Clause Structure, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1 (2nd ed., pp. 61-131). Cambridge University Press.

Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of Negative Morpheme and Verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/143

Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 58-90). MIT Press.

Hartung, K., Jäger, G., Gröttrup, S., & Georges, M. (2022). Typological Word Order Correlations with Logistic Brownian Motion. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP (pp. 22-26). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Hawkins, J. A. (1983). Word order universals. Academic Press.

Hawkins, J. A. (2014). Ten differences between VO and OV languages. In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford University Press.

Lehmann, W. P. (1973). A structural principle of language and its implications. Language, 49(1), 47-66.

Lehmann, W. P. (1978a). The great underlying ground-plans. In W. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 3-55). University of Texas Press.

Lehmann, W. P. (1978b). Conclusion: Toward an understanding of the profound unity underlying languages. In W. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 395-432). University of Texas Press.

Tanaka, T. (2024). Emergence of OV/VO language universal in neural language models [Preprint]. https://tanaka-takuma-lab.github.io/site/ttakuma2024c.pdf

Tomlin, R. (1986). Basic word order. Croom Helm.

Vennemann, T. (1974). Analogy in generative grammar: The origin of word order. In H. Heilmann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguistics (pp. 79-83). Il Mulino.