Exploring the Status and Content of the Precautionary Principle from the Perspective of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

Authors

  • Krisdakorn Wongwuthikun Faculty of Law, Thammasat University

Keywords:

Precautionary Principle, Law of the Sea, Marine Environment

Abstract

The precautionary principle is a cornerstone of international environmental law, asserting that scientific uncertainty should not delay the implementation of effective and cost-efficient measures to prevent environmental degradation. This principle is crucial for the protection and preservation of the marine environment. Despite many international agreements mandating member states to adopt measures guided by the precautionary principle, ambiguities persist regarding its content and legal status. Notably, the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea lacks explicit provisions on the precautionary principle, yet its ethos is mirrored in several clauses. Over the past two decades, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea has had opportunities to adjudicate disputes invoking this principle, providing clarifications on its implications. This article explores the Tribunal’s developments and interpretations, aiming to elucidate how it perceives the precautionary principle and how states can fulfill their international obligations to protect the marine environment based on the precautionary principle. Additionally, it also explores the legal status of the principle.

References

Bialek, Dean, ‘Australia & New Zealand v Japan: Southern Bluefin Tuna Case’ (2000) 1 Melbourne Journal of International Law 153.

Cameron, James and Abouchar, Juli, ‘The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law’ in David Freestone and Ellen Hey (eds) The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (Kluwer Law International 1996)

Churchill, Robin and Scott, Joanne, ‘The MOX Plant Litigation: The First Half-Life’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 643.

Churchill, Robin, ‘The LOSC Regime for Protection of the Marine Environment – Fit for The Twenty-First Century?’ in Rosemary Rayfuse (ed), Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2015) 9.

Cullet, Philippe, ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibility’ in Jorge E. Viñuales (ed), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (OUP 2015)

Fabra, Adriana, ‘The LOSC and the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle’ (1999) 10 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 15.

Freestone, David, ‘Caution or Precaution: A Rose by Any Other Name?’ (1999) 10 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 15.

Nguyen, Lan Ngoc, The Development of the Law of the Sea by UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Bodies (CUP 2023).

Nicolas de Sadeleer, Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (OUP 2002).

Sage-Fuller, Bénédicte, The Precautionary Principle in Marine Environmental Law: With Special Reference to High Risk Vessels (Routledge 2013).

Trouwborst, Arie, Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law (Kluwer Law International 2002).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Wongwuthikun, K. (2024). Exploring the Status and Content of the Precautionary Principle from the Perspective of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Nitipat NIDA Law Journal, 13(1), 17–31. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nitipat/article/view/272353