THE EFFECTS OF REMEDIAL TEACHING STRATEGIES ON UNDERGRADUATE CHEMISTRY STUDENT’S LEARNING IN UNITS OF MEASUREMENT

Authors

  • Kamonthip Ongartyuthanakorn Suan Sunandha Rajaphat University
  • Borwonnun Daokrajang Suan Sunandha Rajaphat University
  • Sunhajutha Tirangkoor Suan Sunandha Rajaphat University
  • Chaweewan Kaewsaiha Suan Sunandha Rajaphat University
  • Kanokrat Kunasaraphan Suan Sunandha Rajaphat University

Keywords:

Remedial Teaching / Technology-Based Learning / Units of Measurement

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate the effects of remedial teaching on improving the undergraduate chemistry students’ ability, and (2) to assess the undergraduate chemistry students’ satisfaction towards the remedial teaching. The participants were 19 chemistry undergraduate students of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha  Rajabhat University. The researchers provided the activity sheets and technology-based learning (Kahoot!) through the remedial teaching strategies: Engagement (E), Discussion (D),  and Conclusion (C) to develop mathematical concepts’ in units of measurement: Scientific  Notation, Standard International Unit--SI Prefix, Unit of Volume, and Unit of Mass. The results showed that the students were seen to do marginally better overall significantly, and there was high satisfaction with the implementation of the remedial teaching strategies.

References

Attard, C. & Curry, C. (2012). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. In Mathematics Education: Expanding Horizons: Proceedings of the  35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of  Australasia; Dindyal, J., Cheng, L.P., Ng, S.F., Eds.; Mathematics Education Research  Group of Australasia: Singapore. 

Duplanty, B. (2013, Jan 14). Lesson closure strategies. Retrieved from http://k12edresources.com/229/Education

Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2007,  July 1). Chapter 3-Remedial teaching strategies. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/special/resources/serc/irtp/book-3.html Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109. [CrossRef] 

Gibson, S. (2015, June 14). Why Kahoot is one of my favorite classroom tools. Retrieved  from http://tomorrowslearners.com/why-kahoot-is-one-of-my-favourite-classroom tools/ 

Kozma, R., & Schank, P. (1998). Connecting with the twenty-first century: Technology in support of educational reform. In C. Dede (Ed.), Technology and learning. Washington,  DC: American Society for Curriculum Development. 

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NTCM. Available online at http://standards.ntcm.org Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231. 

Teed, R. (2016, Nov. 14). Game-based learning. Retrieved from https://serc.carleton.edu/  introgeo/games/index.html 

The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2008). The Basic  Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551 (A.D. 2008): Mathematics.

Bangkok, IPST. Won, J. (2015) Use discussion to promote active learning in the classroom: Strategies and tips for college teachers. Retrieved fromhttps://successfulteaching.wordpress.com/  2015/01/09/promoting-discussion-in-class/

Downloads

Published

2021-02-22

How to Cite

Ongartyuthanakorn, K. ., Daokrajang, B. ., Tirangkoor, . S. ., Kaewsaiha, C. ., & Kunasaraphan, K. . (2021). THE EFFECTS OF REMEDIAL TEACHING STRATEGIES ON UNDERGRADUATE CHEMISTRY STUDENT’S LEARNING IN UNITS OF MEASUREMENT. Nimitmai Review Journal, 1(2), 14–20. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nmrj/article/view/249208