Factors Affecting the Administration Effectiveness of Jiaying University in Meizhou, Guangdong Province.
Keywords:
Administration effectiveness,Factors effecting the administration effectiveness, Jiaying universityAbstract
The objectives of this research were: (1) to determine the administration effectiveness and the factors effecting the administration effectiveness of Jiaying university; (2) to propose the model of the factors effecting the administration effectiveness of Jiaying university;and (3) to suggest the guideline to improve the administration effectiveness of JYU.The research was a mixed methodology, including qualitative and quantitative research. The research population included 1436 administrators, staff and full-time teachers of Jiaying university. A proportional stratified random sampling method was used for sampling. According to G*Power calculation, the total sample size was 318 people. (Özgenel., M. (2019). The tools for data collection were semi-structured interviews and five-point rating scale questionnaires. The methods of data analysis are descriptive statistics and confirmatory factor analysis using statistical software.The research findings revealed that: 1. The administration effectiveness of Jiaying University has three components, including leadership management, teacher effectiveness, and the ability to serve society; there are two factors that effecting administration effectiveness in Jiaying University: personal factors and situational factors. 2. The developed model indicators: significance probability value (c2 ) = 0.052, degrees of freedom (df) = 33, goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.935, (GFI) = 0.946, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.958, and root mean square error (RMSEA) = 0.054, all in line with the prescribed standards, and the factor loading of personality factors and situational factor variables on administration effectiveness is 0.98, showing positive correlation and direct influence, and the correlation is strong. 3. The guidelines for improving the administration effectiveness of Jiaying University mainly include: (1) Improving the quality and ability of managers themselves; (2) Improving the effectiveness of teachers; and (3) Strengthening the ability to serve society.
References
Abd-Rabo, A. M.Q., &Hashaikeh, S. A. I. (2020). Assessing school principals' perceptions of school effectiveness in the Palestinian schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5536-5546.
Cristián, B. et al. (2020). Effective schools 10 years on: factors and processes enabling the sustainability of school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(2), 266-288.
Campell.J. P, & et al. (2013) .Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness, New York:McGraw-Hill Inc., US, January 1.
Yangfang. L. (2021). Governance of universities——Take three local universities in Fujian Province as an example. Journal of Wuyi University, 40(4), 102-105.
Mahapoonyanont, T., et al (2018). How Responsible Leadership by School Administrators and Effective Teamwork, Influences the Effectiveness of Schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission, Thailand with Intellectual Capital as a Mediator.Psaku International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 7(1).
Özgenel., M. (2019). The Role of Teacher Performance in School Effectiveness, (4), 417.
Laochai. P.(2019). Administrator Competency and Personnel. Technology Management Research, (19), 154-157.
Goksoy. S. (2020). The Necessity of School Effectiveness and the Ways to reach. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, (9), 38-53.
Minglong., W. (2010). Structural equation model: the operation and application of the AMOS. Chongqing University Press.
Feiyue X.& Xi, L. (2016). School Effectiveness: A New Perspective of Vocational School Evaluation. Vocational Education Research, (02), 45-49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nimitmai Review Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.