From Suspicion to Hostility: Thai-Chinese Relations during the Cold War through the Lens of Structural Realism (1949-1969)
Keywords:
Thai-Chinese relations, Cold War, Structural realism, Hostility, Small stateAbstract
This article explores the evolution of Thai-Chinese relations during the Cold War (1949-1969) through the theoretical lens of structural realism by employing the analytical focus from internal variables to the external structure of the international system and proving a systemic explanation for the change of state behavior between Thailand and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from mutual suspicion to overt confrontation. The study examines and analyzes three shifting periods in the trajectory of Thai-Chinese relations. The first period of mutual suspicion and strategic rebalancing (1949-1954), characterized by Thailand’s alignment with the United States and its concerns over the spread of communism through overseas Chinese communities to against China’s ideological influence. The second period of diplomatic overtures and temporary détente (1955–1959), meeting between Thailand and China delegation plays an important role for backchannel diplomacy. The third period of overt hostility (1960-1969), regional conflicts such as Laos crisis amplified ideological divides to Thailand and China’s diplomatic rapprochement struggle. These three periods between 1949 and 1969 reflect the adjustment of policies and strategies in both countries in response to the pressures from the structure of the constantly changing international system. While internal ideological and political factors influenced state behavior to some extent, the article argues that the major factor shaping the policies of both countries was the severely polarized and anarchic structure of the international order, defined by bipolarity and the asymmetrical distribution of power. In addition, this study identifies the underlying structural conditions that accelerated the downturn in Thai-Chinese relations and examines their broader implications for how small states position themselves within global power structures.
References
Buszynski, L. (1983). SEATO: The Failure of An Alliance Strategy. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Chinvanno, A. (1991). Brief Encounter: Thai-Chinese Rapprochement after Bandung, 1955-
Bangkok: Institute of Foreign Affairs.
Gurtov, M. (1975). China and Southeast Asia: The Politics of Survival. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Jain, R.K. (1984). Thailand and China, 1949-1983, New Delhi: Radiant Publishers.
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
People’s Daily. (1950). Editorial on Chinese citizens in Thailand. People’s Daily, January 27.
People’s Daily. (1960). Thailand and the U.S. aggression in Laos. People’s Daily, May 30.
Peking Review. (1955). Zhou Enlai and the Bandung Spirit. Peking Review, 2(16), 3–7.
Peking Review. (1964). Declaration of the Thai Patriotic Front. Peking Review, 9(1), 8–10.
Peking Review. (1967). Revolutionary movements in Thailand. Peking Review, 12(20), 5–9.
Phathanothai, S. (2006). The Dragon’s Pearl: Growing up among Mao’s Reclusive Circle. UK: Pocket Books.
Skinner, W.G. (1957). Chinese Society in Thailand: An Analytical History, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill.
Whiting, A. S. (1960). China Crosses the Yalu: The Decision to Enter the Korean War.
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Xinhua News Agency. (1950). China’s protest note to Thailand regarding Chinese nationals. Beijing: Xinhua Archives.
Zhou Enlai. (1955). Speech at the Asian-African Conference. Bandung: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC.
Zhou Enlai. (1965). Statement on Southeast Asia Security and U.S. Military Bases in Thailand. Beijing: Foreign Ministry Bulletin.
Zhai, Q. (2000). China and the Vietnam Wars, 1950–1975. North Carolina: University of
North Carolina Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nimitmai Review Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.