Factors influencing Working Age’s Decision Making in Digital Asset Investments: a study of Fraction Ownership in Thai Property
Keywords:
Fractional Ownership, Digital Asset, Digital Token, Property Asset TokenizationAbstract
The research aims to study the factors influencing working-age individuals' decision-making in digital asset investments, focusing on fractional ownership in Thai property. This study is expected to provide valuable insights and serve as a guideline for future investments in Thailand's digital property sector. Data for this study were collected using an online questionnaire, which was distributed to 402 respondents, including 236 experienced investors and 166 inexperienced investors. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and hypothesis testing was performed using inferential statistics. The findings revealed that experienced investors had a higher level of knowledge regarding property asset tokenization than inexperienced investors. Moreover, a positive relationship was observed between knowledge levels and increased awareness of property asset tokenization, particularly among inexperienced investors. Notably, the research also discovered that while experience in investment and awareness of property asset tokenization were important, they did not significantly influence the level of concern about property asset tokenization among respondents. Furthermore, the study examined the impact of the marketing mix factors (7Ps) on property asset tokenization. It was found that the price alignment with the property’s location and type directly affected the concerns regarding property asset tokenization. The analysis also showed that experienced investors placed more emphasis on factors such as the location, post-investment value, and potential capital gain when making investment decisions. This indicates that experienced investors are more likely to consider a broader range of factors compared to inexperienced investors, who may be more focused on the fundamental aspects such as awareness and basic knowledge of tokenization.
References
Achor, S., Chan, J., Collier, I., Nardani, S., & Rochemont, S. (2017). A cashless society: Benefits, risks, and issues (interim paper). Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. http://www.actuaries.org.uk/documents/cashless-society-benefits-risks-and-issues
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1991). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918.
Alam, M. A., & Binsardi, A. (2020). Knowledge of digital assets and investment decisions in cryptocurrency: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.008
Amutha, D. (2014, March). The effect of demographics on investment choice among investors. Adarsh Journal of Management Research, 7(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.21095/ajmr/2014/v7/i1/88223
Chowdhury, E. K., & Rozario, S. D. (2018). Impact of attitude and awareness of investors on their investment behavior: A study on Bangladesh stock market. The Bangladesh Accountant, 81–89.
Gill, S., Khurshid, M. K., Mahmood, S., & Ali, A. (2018). Factors affecting investment decision making behavior: The mediating role of information searches. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7, 758–767.
Gomber, P., & Kauffman, R. J. (2020). Digital assets and financial market evolution: A review of the literature. Journal of Financial Technology, 10(3), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfinte.2020.01.001
Hargitay, S. E., & Yu, S.-M. (1993). Property investment decisions. E & FN Spon.
Khan, S. N. (2016). Impact of financial literacy, financial knowledge, moderating role of risk perception on investment decision. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727890
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1991). Principles of marketing (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Liu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Segmentation and marketing strategies in digital asset investments: A demographic perspective. Journal of Financial Technology, 6(4), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfinte.2019.03.003
Mitchell, V. W. (1992). Understanding consumers’ behavior: Can perceived risk theory help? Management Decision, 30(5), 26–31.
Pereira, L., & Oliveira, J. (2020). Digital assets and blockchain technology adoption in propertyinvestment: The impact of education and demographics. Journal of Digital Finance, 8(4), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdf.2020.02.003
Raut, R., & Kumar, R. (2018). Investment decision-making process between different groups of investors: A study of Indian stock market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 14(4), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X18813770
Thangthong, S., Arayai, W., & Piyabongkarn, D. (2020). The role of marketing mix (4Ps) in the decision to buy a house: A case study of Kanchanaburi, Thailand. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research, 65, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36485.15846
Yao, L., & Wang, S. (2021). Building trust in digital asset investments through transparency and certification. Journal of Blockchain and Finance, 12(5), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jblockchain.2021.03.004
Zohar, D., & Hacohen, A. (2018). Digital property tokenization and its impact on investment decisions. Journal of Digital Assets, 11(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdigitassets.2018.01.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nimitmai Review Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.