Cost and Return of Investment in New Theory Farming Practices in Amphoe Mueang Nakhon Si Thammarat
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The objective of this research was to analyze the cost and return of investment in New Theory Farming by considering the financial value of the investment. Which are Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and the Payback Period (PB) of the investment. This is a qualitative research by analyzing documents and interviewing 40 key informants, who were the representatives of each district in the research area. The research instrument was interview, and the quality of the instrument is checked according to guidelines. The research result indicated that the problems and obstacles of investing in New Theory Farming in Amphoe Mueang Nakhon Si Thammarat, when considered financial value by Net Present Value Method for the 3-year project, the net present value is positive. Which can be assumed that the 3-rai new theory farming investment is a worthwhile investment and should be invested because it will benefit more than investment money
Article Details
References
Bhusana Preepramote. (1999).New thinking : saving the Thai economy. Bangkok : Ruamduaychuaygan.
Rengrak Champa-Ngern. (2001). Financial Management. (2nd ed.). Bangkok : Booknet.
Samarn Siriphat. (2016). Thai Farmers' Future In the changing world. Kehakaset Journal.(6) 200-202. Office of Agricultural Economics, (2014) “Thailand Agricultural Statistics Year 2014,” http://www.oae.go.th/download/download_journal/2558/yearbook57.pdf.
Narongsak Pin-Gate. (2009). The results of the new theory farming project of the Border Patrol Police School in Udon Thani, Nong Khai, Loei and Sangwawit Witthayu School. Journal of Education, Khon Kaen University. Vol. 32 No. 1 (January – March).
Sathiensri Boonrueang. (1999). Project planning and evaluation. Chiangmai: Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University.
Anurak Thongsukhowong. (2009). Accounting of cost. Khon Kaen : Khon Kaen University.
Likert, Rensis. (1967). “The Method of Constructing and Attitude Scale”. In Reading in Fishbeic, M (Ed.), Attitude Theory and Measurement (pp. 90-95). New York: Wiley & Son.