Buddhist Monasteries’ Adaptation to the Thai Perspectives in Contemporary Society

Main Article Content

Phoom Burana
Somkid Jiratatsanakul

Abstract

Buddhist monasteries or temples have historically played a crucial role in society and surrounding communities, serving as sources of mental solace and purifying individuals’ sense of morality through both mundane and supermundane rituals. While generating immediate welfare, the ultimate goal is to experience positive outcomes in the afterlife. However, the influence of a scientific-based and rationalistic worldview among the Thai elite has led to a transformation in the attitude and role of Buddhism. Upon reviewing documentary evidence, books, and related research, two distinct categories emerge: documents based on social changes affecting Buddhism and those on the design and patterns of Buddhist architecture during periods of societal change. Both categories indicate that the Siamese elite’s establishment of the modern nation-state diminished Buddhism’s role, retaining only its mundane aspects. Concurrently, the Western economic system and values gained significance in Thai society, influencing the adaptation of Buddhist monasteries.


The adaptation, spanning from the past to the present, can be classified into three categories: 1. Adaptation under the influence of nationalist perspectives. 2. Adaptation to address materialistic and consumerist perspectives. 3. Adaptation of a Buddhist commercial style to align with individuals’ worldviews. These adaptations result from changes in the roles and responsibilities of the Buddhachakra over time.


The article concludes that every adaptation aims to sustain Buddhist institutions through various conditions. Noteworthy is the contemporary trend of increased ceremonialism and participation in worship seeking blessings, possibly reflecting complex needs and distress among the Thai populace. There is a pressing need for emotional support. This situation poses both a crisis and an opportunity for Buddhist institutions to leverage their faith in alleviating mental suffering. However, seizing such opportunities requires direct responses to the present needs and behaviors of the Thai people. Therefore, the role of Buddhist spaces can be reinvigorated as spiritual centers, presenting Dhamma information to Thai society in a contemporary context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
ARTICLES

References

Boonyakorn Wachiratienchai. “Atathārot’ khati khwām chư̄a læ kānsāng san ngān phutthapatimā [Attharassa: Beliefs and Buddhist Statues].” NAJUA: History of Architecture and Thai Architecture 8 (September 2011-August 2012): 55-75.

Buddhadasa Indapanno Archives -BIA-. Trā sanyalak læ sarup phāp rūam [Emblem and Overview]. June 23, 2017. Video, 07:06. Available from www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y80CV_9GknA

Buddhadasa Indapanno Archives Foundation. Rāingān phon kāndamnœ̄n ngān pī sō̜ngphanhārō̜ihāsippǣt thưng sō̜ngphanhārō̜ihāsipkāo [Performance Report for 2015 - 2016]. Bangkok: Buddhadasa Indapanno Archives Foundation, 2016.

Buddhadasa [pseud.]. Kǣn phutsā [Heart-Wood from the Bo Tree]. Bangkok: Thammasapa.

Chatri Prakitnonthakan. Kānmư̄ang læ sangkhom nai sinlapa sathāpattayakam Sayām samai Thai prayuk chātniyom [Politics and Society in Architectural Art Siamese Contemporary Thai Nationalism]. Bangkok: Matichon, 2004.

Chatri Prakitnonthakan. Sinlapa - sathāpattayakam khana rātsadō̜n sanyalak thāngkān mư̄ang nai chœ̄ng ʻudomkān [Art and Architecture of the People’s Party Political Symbol of Ideology]. 3rd ed. Bangkok: Matichon, 2020.

Chawalit Atipatayakul. “Rūpbǣp ‘ubōsot chūang Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ngphansīrō̜ipǣtsipsī thưng sō̜ngphanhārō̜isip nai čhangwat ‘Udō̜n Thānī : kō̜ranī sưksā klum rūpbǣp phasom ‘itthiphon chāng Yūan læ phư̄n thin [Pibulsongkram’s Ordination Hall Standardization Plans].” Damrong Journal 9, 1 (January–June 2010): 101-116.

Dhammakaya Foundation. Mahā thammakāi čhēdī mahāčhēdī phư̄a santiphāp lōk [The Maha Dhammakaya Cetiya: the Cetiya for World Peace]. Patum Thani: Master Publishing, 2000.

Fine Arts Department. Chaonāi læ khārātchakān krāp bangkhom thūn khwāmhen čhatkān plī anplǣng rātchakān phǣndin Rō̜. Sō̜. Nưngrō̜isām læ phra rāt damrat nai phra bāt somdet phra Čhunlačhō̜mklao čhao yū hūa song thalǣng phra bō̜rom rā chā thi bāi kǣkhai kān pokkhrō̜ng phǣndin [The Princes and Civil Ser vants expressed their Opinions on the Changes in Government Administration, 103 Rattanakosin Era, and the Royal Speech of His Majesty King Chulalongkorn, who Gave His Royal Explanation for Amending the Administration of the Country]. Bangkok: Niyomkij Publishing, 1973.

Kanungnit Chantabutr. Kān khlư̄ anwai khō̜ng yuwa song Thai run rǣk Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ngphansīrō̜ičhetsipčhet thưng sō̜ngphansīrō̜ipǣtsipsī [The Movement of the First Generation of Thai Monks, 1934-1941]. Bangkok: Thammasat University, 1985.

Nidhi Eawsriwong. Kānmư̄ ang Thai samai phračhao krung Thon Burī [Thai Politics during the Reign of the King of Thonburi]. Bangkok: Silpawattanatham, 1986.

Nidhi Eawsriwong. Pākkai læ bai rư̄a rūam khwām rīang wādūai wannakam læ prawat sāt ton rattanakōsin [Pen and Sail: Literature and History in Early Bangkok]. 4th ed. Bangkok: Same Sky Books, 2012.

Nidhi Eawsriwong. Phut sātsanā nai khwām plī anplǣng khō̜ng sangkhom Thai [Buddhism and Changes of thai Society]. Bangkok: Komol Keemthong Foundation, 2000.

Nopphanat Anupongphat. “Phonkrathop khō̜ng phrarātchabanyat laksana pokkhrō̜ng khana song Rō̜. Sō̜. nưngrō̜iyīsip‘et tō̜ ‘akān pokkhrō̜ng khana song Thai [The Impact of Sangha Act of 1902 on the Thai Sangha Administration].” Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, 2003.

Nussara Jittakasem and Predee Phisphumvidhi. “Rūp khaorop khanāt yai mahưmā thāng sātsanā: kān plī anplǣng krabūankān sāng khwāmmāi læ phāp sathō̜n sangkhom Thai [Huge Religious Object of Worship: Change, Significant Creation and Reflection on Thai Society].” Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Burapha University 25, 47 (January–April 2017): 123-147.

Pataraporn Sirikanchana. “Santi ‘asōk khwāmpenmā læ botbāt thāng sātsanā nai sangkhom Thai [Santi Asoka: Its Development and Religious Roles in Thai Society].” Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University 8, 1 (January-April 2001): 6-68.

Phra Paisal Visalo. Phraphutsāsanā Thai nai ʻanākhot nǣonōm læ thāngʻō̜k čhāk wikrit [The Future, Trend and Solution for Thai Buddhism Crisis]. 3rd ed. Bangkok: Komol Keemthong Foundation, 2015.

Phra Phromkunaphorn (P.A. Payutto). Kānphatthanā thī yangyư̄n [Sustainable Development]. 12th ed. Bangkok: Sahadhammika Press, 2010.

“Phrarātchabanyat khana song Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ng phan sī rō̜i pǣt sip sī [Sangha Act 1941].” The Royal Thai Government Gazette, Vol. 58 (14 October 1941): 1391-1410.

“Phrarātchabanyat laksana pokkhrō̜ng khana song Rō̜.Sō̜ nưngrō̜iyīsip‘et. [Sangha Administration Act, 121 Rattanakosin Era].” The Royal Thai Government Gazette, Vol. 19 (29 June 1902): 214-223.

Phuwadon Phusiri. “Ngān ‘ō̜k bǣp sathāpattayakam khō̜ng phra phrom Phičhit (‘Ū Lā phā non): rūppatham hǣng ‘udomkān chātniyom Phō̜. Sō̜. sō̜ngphansīrō̜ičhetsiphā thưng sō̜ngphansīrō̜ikāosip [Architectural Design of Phra Phrombhichitr (Ou Labhanonda): Physical Manifestation of the Nationalist Ideology, 1932-1947].” Academic Journal of Architecture 74 (January-June 2022): 1-16.

Phuwamin Wadkean, Jumnian Junhasobhaga and Yothin Sawangdee. “Botbāt khō̜ng samnak Santi ‘asōk nai kān khlư̄ anwai thāng sangkhom [The Role of Santi Asoke in Social Movement].” Journal of Social Science and Buddhist Anthropology 6, 4 (April 2021): 434-450.

Pinyapan Potjanalawan. “Kānsāng phư̄nthī ‘aphi mahā wihān læ phut sin bǣp fǣn tā sī khō̜ngwat phra thammakāi [The Production of the Buddhist Megechurch and the Fantasy Buddhist Art by Wat Phra Dhammakaya, Thailand].” NAJUA: History of Architecture and Thai Architecture 11 (September-December 2014): 90-107.

Saichol Sattayanurak. Rāingān wičhai chabap sombūn khrōngkān prawattisāt withī khit kīeokap sangkhom læ watthanatham Thai khō̜ng panyāchon (Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ngphansīrō̜isāmsiphā thưng sō̜ngphanhārō̜isāmsiphā) [A History of the Thinking about Thai Society and Culture from the Viewpoints of Thai Intellectuals Project (1892-1992): Final Report]. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund, 2007.

Sasipim Issarawattana and Suchita Manajit. “Kān plīanplǣng phūm that watthanatham ‘annư̄ angmāčhāk khwām chư̄a : kō̜ranī sưksā wat čhēdī ( ‘ai khai ) ‘amphœ̄ si chon čhangwat Nakhō̜n Sī Thammarāt [Cutural Landscape Changes from Faith: A Case Study of Wat Chedi (Ai Khai), Sichon, Nakhon Si Thammarat].” Journal of Social Science and Buddhist Anthropology 7, 4 (April 2022): 18-30.

Somkid Jiratatsanakul. Wat: phut sātsana sathāpattayakam Thai [Temple: Thai Sacral Architecture]. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press, 2001.

Somkid Jiratatsanakul. Ngānʻō̜ kbǣp sathāpattayakamthai fīphrahat Somdetčhaofā kromphrayā narisrānuwattiwong [The Architectural Works of H.R.H. Prince Narisara nuvattiwongse]. Bangkok: Chalermprakiat Institute of Thai Art and Architecture, Silpakorn University, 2013.

Wallop Pumara. “Khwāmsamphan rawāng kān mư̄ang rư̄ang sātsanā ‘amnāt thāngkān mư̄ang læ khrōngsāngʻ ōkāt thāngkān mư̄ang : kō̜ranī sưksā khana patisangkhō̜n kān phra sātsanā nai samai plī anplǣng kān pokkhrō̜ng khō̜ng prathēt Thai [The Relationship between Religious Politics, Political Power and the Political Opportunities Structure: A Case Study of the Thai Buddhist Structural Restoration in the Era of Political Regime Shift].” Journal of Human Rights and Peace 3, 2 (July-December 2017): 57-91.

Worrasit Tantipantkul, “‘Amnāt rat nư̄a wat: sing thī hāi pai čhāk sangkhom Thai [State power over Temples: Something Missing from Thai society].” NAJUA: History of Architecture and Thai Architecture 5 (September 2007): 86-95