From Riverine to Urban Reality: Tracing the Transformation of Riverfront Communities - A Case Study of Koh Kret, Khlong Om Non, and Khlong Chak Phra-Khlong Bangkok Yai
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The transformation of riverfront communities in Bangkok and its peripheries highlights the intricate interplay between urban development and the preservation of traditional lifestyles. This study explores the evolution of three distinct riverfront areas—Koh Kret, Khlong Om Non, and Khlong Chak Phra-Khlong Bangkok Yai—through comparative spatial analysis. The aim is to understand how these communities have adapted to urban pressures while preserving their cultural heritage.
Koh Kret represents a fusion of cultural preservation and modern challenges, maintaining traditional stilt house architecture and multi-level terraces. Infrastructure development has been minimal, allowing the island to retain its historical value. However, limited accessibility and frequent flooding remain significant challenges. Despite its potential for tourism development, supported by government initiatives, concerns about the island’s long-term sustainability are heightened by physical deterioration and a declining population.
Khlong Om Non reflects the blend of traditional and modern influences, characterized by stilt houses and agricultural land. The construction of flood defenses and new roads has improved accessibility but has disrupted traditional water-based transportation and agricultural practices. These changes have impacted land use and the community’s adaptive capacity. While recent infrastructure improvements have enhanced tourism potential, the key challenge lies in balancing development with the preservation of cultural and ecological values.
Khlong Chak Phra-Khlong Bangkok Yai is the most developed among the three areas, featuring a range of residential types, from traditional stilt houses to modern buildings. Its proximity to Bangkok and comprehensive infrastructure have strengthened its integration into the city’s economic and cultural networks. However, this development has led to ecological degradation and declining water quality. The tension between urban development and environmental conservation remains a critical issue. Although the area holds significant value for heritage tourism, environmental challenges pose a substantial risk to its sustainability.
The comparative analysis of the three areas reveals a complex picture of transformation influenced by urbanization pressures, infrastructural developments, and environmental challenges. Each area demonstrates distinct patterns of adaptation and preservation, underscoring the need for integrated planning approaches that balance economic development with cultural and environmental sustainability. This study highlights the importance of preserving the unique characteristics of riverfront communities while addressing the challenges posed by urban expansion and environmental changes.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ariya Aruninta, Hajime Matsushima, and Pachara Phukumchai. “Flow or Fence: Learning, Preserving, and Redefining the Riverfront Cultural Landscape.” Journal of Water Resource and Protection 12, 11 (November 2020): 921-933.
Asadaporn Kiatthanawat, Patiphol Yodsurang, and Aracha Krasae-in. “Exploring Thai Vernacular Houses for Heritage Tourism along the Western Bangkok Canals.” Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning 23, 1 (2024): Article 407.
Beek, Steve Van. The Chao Phya: River in Transition. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Birks, Hilary H., H.J.B. Birks, Peter Emil Kaland, and Dagfinn Moe. The Cultural Landscape: Past, Present and Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Chaweewan Denpaiboon and Mamoru Tohiguchi. “Transformation of the Canal-Side Settlements in Greater Bangkok.” Journal of Architectural Research and Studies 2 (2004): 241-257.
Danai Thaitakoo and Brian McGrath. “Landscape Hydro-Ecological Infrastructure of Bangkok’s Waterscape Urbanism.” Social Science Asia 7, 4 (October 2021): 41-49.
Department of Drainage and Sewerage, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. Khrōngkān kō̜sāng rabop rūaprūam nāmsīa læ rabop bambat nāmsīa Thonburī sanyā thī sām ngān kō̜sāng rabop rūaprūam nāmsīa phư ̄ n thī sūan tai (khēt Bāngkō̜k Nō̜i læ khēt Bāngkō̜k Yai) [The Thonburi Wastewater Collection and Treatment System Construction Project, Contract No. 3: Construction of the Wastewater Collection System for the Southern Area (Bangkok Noi District and Bangkok Yai District)]. Accessed June 8, 2024. Available from https://policy.bangkok.go.th/tracking/frontend/web/index.php?r=site%2Fprojectview&ID=6810.
Khemachat Wongtimarat. “Nǣothāng kānʻanurak khlō̜ng læ chumchon rim khlō̜ng Bāngkō̜k Yai [Conservation Guidelines for Bangkok Yai Canal and It’s Communities]. ”Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, 2003.
Luan, Ivy Ong Bee. “Singapore Water Management Policies and Practices.” In Asian Perspectives on Water Policy, edited by Cecilia Tortajada and Asit Biswas. London: Routledge, 2012.
Marks, Danny and Eli Elinoff. “Splintering Disaster: Relocating Harm and Remaking Nature after the 2011 Floods in Bangkok.” International Development Planning Review 42, 3 (2020): 273-294.
Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina B. “Public Life in Bangkok’s Urban Spaces.” Habitat International 36, 4 (October 2012): 452-461.
Narongpon Laiprakobsup and Thanapan Laiprakobsup. “Urbanization, Impermeable Boundary and Losing Communal Identity: a Case Study of the Local Waterfront Community in Bangkok Suburbs.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 44, 3 (July-September 2023): 729–738.
Nattika Navapan and Kornticha Oonprai. “Integration of Historic Places in New Urban Development: a Case Study of Phitsanulok, Thailand.” Geographia Technica 14, Special Issue (2019): 22–31.
Oppermann, Rainer, Ernesto Aguirre, Richard Bleil, and others. “A Rapid Method for Monitoring Landscape Structure and Ecological Value in European Farmlands: the Lisa Approach.” Landscape Online 90 (2021): 1-24.
Ornsiri Panin. “Sing fǣng rēn phāitai rūpsong rư ̄ an Thai khō̜ng rư ̄ an phư ̄n thin Thai - Mō̜n læ Thai - Lāo nai phư ̄nthī lumnam phāk klāng khō̜ng prathēt Thai [The Hidden Dimension in the Traditional Thai Houses of the Thai-Mon and Thai-Lao Vernacular Houses in the Central Regions River Basin of Thailand].” NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment 32 (January-December 2017): B2-B22.
Pachara Phukumchai. “Krabūankān mī sūan rūam khō̜ng chumchon rim mǣnam Čhaophrayā phư ̄ a kān banthao phonkrathop thāng lop nai khrōngkān kō̜sāng khư ̄ an rim taling bō̜riwēn ʻamphœ̄ Pākkret čhangwat Nonthaburī [The Riverfront Communities Participatory Process for Adverse Effect Mitigation of the Chaophraya River Embankment Construction Project in Pak-Kret Area Nontaburi Province].” Sarasatr 2, 1 (2019): 71-84.
Panatpan Laddaklom. “Kānsưksā khwām phasān khō̜ng phư ̄n thī tō̜ mư ̄ ang læ khwāmsāmāt nai kān khaočhai mư ̄ ang khō̜ng yān sō̜i thā nam Čhaophrayā nai khēt Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n [Synergy and Intelligibility of the Chao Phraya Riverside Alley Areas in Bangkok].” Academic Services Journal, Prince of Songkla University 31, 1 (January-April 2020): 221-232.
Patcharee Ardsalee. “Phūmithat watthanatham khō̜ng chumchon rimkhlō̜ng ʻOm Non ʻamphœ̄ Bāng Yai čhangwat Nonthaburī [Cultural Landscape of Omnon Water-Based Community, Amphoe Bang Yai, Nonthaburi Province].” Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, 2009.
Patiphol Yodsurang. “Phai khuk khām tō̜ laksana thāng kāiyaphāp khō̜ng chumchon kao rim nam nai khēt thī rāp lum nam Čhaophrayā [Threats Affecting Physical Characteristics of the Old Waterfront Communities in the Chao Phraya River Basin].” Asian Creative Architecture, Art and Design 28, 1 (January-June 2019): 21-34.
Patiphol Yodsurang and Uekita Yasufumi. “A Traditional Community in the Chao Phraya River Basin II: Influence of Water Circulation on the Traditional Living Culture according to the Settlement Pattern.” Asian Culture and History 8, 1 (2016): 112-125.
Patiphol Yodsurang and Werapong Wiyati. “Kān sư ̄ khwāmmāi mō̜radok watthanatham bān kao læ rư ̄ an bōrān nai mư ̄ ang kao nakhō̜n Lampāng [Cultural Heritage Interpretation of Old Home and Historic House in the Old Town of Nakhon Lampang].” Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies 19, 2 (July-December 2022): 35-54.
Patiphol Yodsurang, Miki Hiromi, and Uekita Yasufumi. “A Traditional Community in the Chao Phraya River Basin: Classification and Characteristics of a Waterfront Community Complex.” Asian Culture and History 8, 1 (2016): 57–68.
Patiphol Yodsurang, Unyaporn Suthutvoravut, and Wandee Pinijvarasin. “Post-Covid-19 Spatial Resilience in Community-based Tourism: a Case Study on Ayutthaya.” Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 32, 2 (June 2024): 409-435.
Patiphol Yodsurang, Yasufumi Uekita, and Ikuro Shimizu. “Water-Based Settlement and the Loss of Community Water Resilience.” Interiority 5, 2 (2022): 179-196.
Piyanuch Nakkong. “Čhulā čhā rưk: banthưk Bāngkō̜k chabap thī nưng [Chulalongkorn Chronicles: Bangkok Record No. 1].” Jamjuree Journal 16, 1 (2014): 30-37.
Rijke, Jeroen, Sebastiaan van Herk, Chris Zevenbergen, and Richard Ashley. “Room for the River: Delivering Integrated River Basin Management in the Netherlands.” International Journal of River Basin Management 10, 4 (2012): 369-382.
Saranyapong Chotiwan. “Phonkrathop khō̜ng talātnam Talingchan tō̜ chumchon rim nam khlō̜ng Chakphra khwǣng Khlō̜ng Chakphra hēt Talingchan Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n [Impact of Talingchan Floating Market on Khlong Chakphra Community, Khlong Chakphra Sub-District, Talingchan District, Bangkok].” Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, 2006.
Sirko, Wojciech, Sergii Kashubin, Marvin Ritter and others. “Continental-Scale Building Detection from High Resolution Satellite Imagery.” arXiv 2107.12283 (2021): 1-15.
Sumet Jumsai. “Water and Mountain.” Ekistics 46, 278 (September/October 1979): 334-338.
Suthat Samphawamontri. “Sathāpattayakam tō̜ khayāi: kō̜ranī sưksā kān tō̜ khayāi khō̜ng sathāpattayakam yū ʻāsai rim nam Ko ̜ Kret [Expansion Architecture: A Study of Koh Ked Waterfront Expansion Architecture].” Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University 4, 1 (May-August 2011): 346-362.
Thatkham Suvandy. “Kān raksā ʻattalak khwāmpen Mō̜n phān kānthō̜ngthīeo chœ̄ ng watthanatham kō̜ranī sưksā chumchon Mō̜n Ko Kret ʻ Ko Kret ʻamphœ̄ Pākkret čhangwat Nonthaburī [Preservation of Mon’s Identity through Cultural Tourism: a Case Study of Mon Community on Koh Kret, Pak Kret District, Nonthaburi Province].” Journal of MCU Social Development 8, 1 (January-April 2023): 302-313.
Tuangporn Pitinanon and Danai Thaitakoo. “Kān plīanplǣng khō̜ng phūmithat læ khwām pen mư ̄ ang nai phư ̄nthī dindō̜n sāmlīam pākmǣnam Čhaophrayā: Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n læ pō̜rimonthon [Landscape Changes and Urbanization in the Chao Phraya Delta Focusing on Bangkok and Suburban Area].” Sarasatr 1, 4 (2018): 636-654.
Ying Palopakon. “Khrōngsāng khō̜ng rabop niwēt phūmithat læ kān bō̜rikān chœ̄ ng niwēt khō̜ng phū mi that kō̜ranī sưksā lampradōng læ rō̜ng sūan nai khrōng khāi sēnthāng nam khlō̜ng ʻOm Non Bāng Yai, Nonthaburī [Landscape Ecological Structure and Ecological Service Case Study: The Irrigation Ditches and Orchard’s Ditches in a Canal Network, Omm-Nont Canal, Bang-Yai, Nonthaburi].” Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, 2009.