Net Neutrality Regulations in Thailand towards the Basis of Free and Fair Competition: Stick or Carrot?
Keywords:
Net Neutrality, Regulations, Internet Service Providers, ThailandAbstract
This paper intends to examine whether net neutrality (NN) is a legitimate concern in Thailand. The issue of NN currently plays a major role in debates in many countries, while simultaneously posing challenges for policymakers. It is expected to become part of the global mainstream discussion in the near future. Net neutrality has impacts on various aspects of economics, politics, and society. In addition, the role of NN in telecommunications is of the utmost concern, especially its role in regulatory frameworks for content providers as it pertains to Over-the-Top (OTT) services, which have been increasing rapidly in recent years. Thus, this topic needs to be discussed and explored to determine whether NN is appropriate for Thailand, especially in the field of telecommunications regulations by drawing upon the documentary research to address the competitive concerns motivating NN rules and the potential impact of the proposed rules on consumer welfare. Results show that there is significant and growing competition among Internet service providers (ISPs), and that few meaningful competitive problems have been observed to date. Moreover, the zero-rating practices in Thailand have been generally harmless to users up to this point. Therefore, it seems that Thailand is better suited to a non-net neutrality (NNN) scenario, with ex-post or light-touch regulations, until there is compelling rationale motivating a move to NN as is being recommended by policymakers in Thailand.
References
Audibert, L. C., & Murray, A. D. (2016). A Principled Approach to Network Neutrality. SCRIPTed Journal, 13(2), 118-143. https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.130216.118
Bauer, J. M. (2007). Dynamic effects of network neutrality. International Journal of Communication, 1, 531-547. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/156
Bauer, J. M., & Knieps, G. (2018). Complementary innovation and network neutrality. Telecommunications Policy, 42(2), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.11.006
Becker, G. S., Carlton, D. W., & Sider, H. S. (2010). Net neutrality and consumer welfare. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 6(3), 497-519. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/joclec/nhq016
Body of European Regulations for Electronic Communications (BEREC). (2015). Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council. BoR, 17(240). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R2120&from=EN%2ELI:%20 http://data.europa. eu/eli/reg/2015/2120/oj
Bourreau, M., Kourandi, F., & Valletti, T. (2015). Net neutrality with competing internet platforms. The Journal of Industrial Economics,63(1), 30-73. www.https:doi//.org/10.1111/joie.12068
Cheng, H. K., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Guo, H. (2011). The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Information systems research, 22(1), 60-82. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0257
Choi, J., & Kim, B. (2010). Net neutrality and investment incentives. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 446-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00107.x
Consumer Protection Act (No. 4) B.E. 2562 (A.D. 2019). (2019, May 27). Royal Gazette. Vol. 136 Pt 69. pp. 96-114.
Eisenach, J. A. (2015). The economics of zero rating. NERA Economic Consulting. https://www.nera.com/ content/dam/nera/publications/2015/EconomicsofZeroRating.pdf
Giles, M. (2017). The Demise of Net Neutrality Will Harm Innovation in America. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/12/07/147223/the-demise-of-net-neutrality-will- harm-innovation-in-america/
Greenstein, S., Peitz, M., & Valletti, T. (2016). Net neutrality: A fast lane to understanding the trade-offs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 127-50. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/ pdfplus/10.1257/jep.30.2.127
Guo, H., Cheng, H. K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2012). Net neutrality, broadband market coverage, and innovation at the edge. Decision Sciences, 43(1), 141-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 5915.2011.00338.x
Hahn, R., & Wallsten, S. (2006). The economics of net neutrality. Economists’ Voice, 3(6). https:// doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1194
Jarintippitak, R. (2017). OTT service: Challenge to the Traditional Media and Regulation. NBTC Journal, 2, 317-340. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NBTC_Journal/article/view /116011/89418
Jitsuzumi, T. (2011). Japan's co-regulatory approach to net neutrality and its flaw: Insufficient literacy on best-effort QoS. Communications & Strategies, (84), 93-110. http://repec.idate.org/RePEc/ idt/journl/CS8405/CS84_JITSUZUMI.pdf
Kline, K. J. (2019). State Responses to Net Neutrality. National Regulatory Research Institute. https://pubs. naruc.org/pub/45ACE3A2-AAEA-417D-2416-B6862C9D4435
Kotrous, M. (2016). Regulation and Net Neutrality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2575436
Krämer, J., & Peitz, M. (2018). A fresh look at zero-rating. Telecommunications Policy, 42(7), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.06.005
Krämer, J., Wiewiorra, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2013). Net neutrality: A progress report. Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 794-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.08.005
McGill, H. M. (2017, May 18). FCC kicks off effort to roll back net neutrality rules. POLITICO https://www. politico.com/story/2017/05/18/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-238529
NBTC. (2017, April 10-May 24). Summary of Public Hearing on draft of the Second Master Plan in Telecommunications [Unpublished raw data], Centara Grand at Central Plaza Ladprao, Bangkok. shorturl.at/sAM24
Nguyen, V., Mohammed, D., Omar, M., & Dean, P. (2020). Net neutrality Around the Globe: A Survey. In Proceedings-3rd International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies. ICICT 2020 (pp. 480-488). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICICT50521.2020.00083
Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A., Stier-Moses, N. E., & Weintraub, G. Y. (2014). Investment in two-sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Review of Network Economics, 12(4), 355-402. https:// doi.org/10.1515/rne-2012-0017
Notification of The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. (2014, August 15). RE: Identifying Operators with Significant Market Power in Each Relevant Market and Measures for the Prevention of Monopoly or Unfair Competition in Telecommunications and Broadcasting Business Act B.E. 2557 (A.D. 2014). Royal Gazette. Vol. 131 Pt 154. pp. 5-10.
Notification of The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. (2014, September 18). RE: Identifying Operators with Significant Market Power in Telecommunications Market B.E. 2557 (A.D. 2014). Royal Gazette. Vol. 131 Pt 184. pp. 9-13.
Notification of The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. (2019, October 25). RE: Standard of Quality of service for Telecommunications Services B.E. 2562 (A.D. 2019). Royal Gazette. Vol. 136 Pt 265. pp. 36-38.
Order of the National Telecommunications Commission No. 32/2553 (2010) Re: Identifying Operators with Significant Market Power in Each Relevant Market and the Operators with Significant Market Power to comply with Specific Measures B.E. 2553. (2010). NBTC. http://nbtc.go.th/law/ Order-of-Organization/Order-of-the-National-Telecommunications-Commi-(1).aspx?lang=en-US
Reggiani, C., & Valletti, T. (2016). Net neutrality and innovation at the core and at the edge. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 45, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.12.005
Saetia, T. (2015). “Net Neutrality”, A Dream of Internet Users?. PostToday. https://www.posttoday.com/ economy/news/378472
Santhi, C. (2019). Zero-rating Service in Mobile Market in Thailand. NBTC Journal, 4, 239-257. https://so04. tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NBTC_Journal/article/view/148350
Singer, H. & Litan, R., (2007). Unintended consequences of net neutrality regulation. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/ get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jtelhtel5§ion=26
Sirilim, N. (2014). Balancing Net Neutrality: Control or Freedom? What Can Thailand Learn from the United States and European Union [Master thesis]. University of Essex, UK. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/10218874/Balancing_Net_Neutrality_Control_or_Freedom_What_ can_Thailand_learn_from_The_United_States_and_European_Union
Srinuan, C., Srinuan, P., & Bohlin, E. (2012). An analysis of mobile Internet access in Thailand: Implications for bridging the digital divide. Telematics and informatics, 29(3), 254-262. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.10.003
Thailand Development Research Institute. (2016). Proposal of the Roadmap of Media Reform for regulating TV Media and Telecommunications. TDRI. https://tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/07/Roadmap.pdf
Time Consulting. (2016). Study of Competition Regulation on Over the Top TV. National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC). https://broadcast.nbtc.go.th/data/academic/ file/600200000005.pdf
Wongprasit, P. (2017). Legal measures regulating over-the-top (OTT) service [Master thesis]. Thammasat University. http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac. th/thesis/2017/TU_2017_5801033316_8721_8213.pdf
Wu, T. (2003). Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination. SSRN Electronic Journal. https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.388863
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Office of the NBTC holds the copyright of articles appearing in the journal. The Office of the NBTC allows the public or individuals to distribute, copy, or republish the work under a Creative Commons license (CC), with attribution (BY), No Derivatives (ND) and NonCommercial (NC); unless written permission is received from the Office of the NBTC.
Text, tables, and figures that appear in articles accepted for publication in this journal are personal opinion and responsibility of the author, and not binding on the NBTC and the Office of the NBTC. In case of errors, each author is solely responsible for their own article, and not concerning the NBTC and the NBTC Office in any way.