A Collaborative Platform for Climate Change Adaptation and Poverty Alleviation in Nakhon Ratchasima
Keywords:
Adaptation, Climate Change, Cooperation, Poverty Alleviation PlatformAbstract
This study aimed to examine and develop collaborative mechanisms, integrated information systems, and operational models for addressing area-based poverty while strengthening
the adaptive capacity of poor households to climate change in Nakhon Ratchasima Province.
A mixed-methods research design was employed, involving 1,087 poor households in four pilot districts. Data were collected through questionnaires, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and the PPPConnext database linked with the Thai People Map and Analytics Platform, together with assessments of disaster risk and local preparedness. The findings reveal that an integrated collaboration mechanism was established among more than
30 organizations from different sectors, accompanied by the formulation of a provincial action plan. Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University functioned as an “area-based university” by forming a multidisciplinary research team and developing more than 87 area managers to support local implementation. The PPPConnext central database identified 21,321 poor households, of which 39% were located in disaster-prone areas. Several area-based poverty alleviation models were developed, including safe mushroom production, pesticide-free vegetable farming, and tamarind value-added processing. These initiatives increased household income by approximately 4,000–15,000 THB per month, reduced expenditures by 23%, and created employment opportunities for poor households. Households also demonstrated stronger economic resilience through diversified income sources, increased savings, and more sustainable livelihood practices. The findings highlight the importance of establishing an official provincial poverty alleviation platform, integrating poverty reduction with climate change adaptation strategies, and strengthening the role of area-based universities in transferring knowledge and innovation to communities. These measures can enhance economic and social stability, reduce vulnerability, and sustainably strengthen the capacity of poor households.
References
Adil, L., Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., & Schäfer, L. (2025). Global climate risk index 2025: Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Germanwatch e.V. https://www.germanwatch.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/Climate%
Risk%20Index%202025.pdf
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., Schäfer, L., & Winges, M. (2021). Global climate risk index 2021: Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2019 and 2000 to 2019. Germanwatch e.V.
Elsner, M., Atkinson, G., & Zahidi, S. (2025). Global risks report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.
Habib, M. (2011). Supply chain management for poverty alleviation: An integrated approach. World Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 63–77.
Lankes, H. P., Macquarie, R., Soubeyran, É., & Stern, N. (2024). The relationship between climate action and poverty reduction. World Bank Research Observer, 39(1), 1–46.
Millard, J., & Fucci, C. (2023). Integrated approaches to poverty reduction in developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 59(4), 324–341.
Ministry of Interior. (2024). Thai People Map and Analytics Platform (TPMAP). http://www.tpmap.in.th
O’Leary, R., Gerard, C., & Bingham, L. B. (2006). Introduction to the symposium on collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Open University Press.
Rigg, J., & Salamanca, A. (2017). Aggregate trends, particular stories: Tracking and explaining evolving rural livelihoods in Southeast Asia. In Routledge handbook of Asian development (pp. 39–52). Routledge.
Ronron, M. (2021). Behavioral insights for poverty alleviation: A framework for designing interventions. Development Policy Review, 39(5), 782–800.
Suphan, C. (2021). Sociocultural dimensions of poverty in Thai society. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 8(2), 1–24. (In Thai)
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
United Nations Development Programme, Thailand. (2024). Thailand’s fourth national communication. UNDP. http://www.undp.org/publications/fourth-national-communication
Weerasak, K. (2020). Driving poverty solutions in Thailand: The role of cooperation between the government and other sectors. Journal of Social Science, 50(1), 79–102. (In Thai)
World Bank Group. (2022). Poverty and shared prosperity report 2022: Correcting course. World Bank.
Yin, X., Han, J., Liu, S., & Zheng, P. (2023). Climate change impacts on rural poverty: Evidence from Asia. Climate and Development, 15(3), 276–289.
Zang, L., & Gai, Y. (2025). Appropriate technology adoption among smallholder farmers: Cases from southern China and Tanzania. Journal of Rural Development, 44(1), 15–33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Local Administration Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the Local Administration Journalis owned by the College of Local Administration, Khon Kaen University.
