Designer's Guide for Healthy Food Packaging Design Concepts after Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Dini Wulansari Department of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Khon Kaen University
  • Dr.Somying Pongpimol Department of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

Packaging designs, Designer's guide, After Covid-19 pandemic

Abstract

Staying healthy has become increasingly important since the outbreak of COVID-19. People are becoming more concerned about their food and beverage intake while implicitly believing that "healthy is not tasty" at the same time. Many studies also paid attention to additional elements in packaging and their influence on consumer purchasing decisions, such as health and eco-friendliness claims. Thus, this study aimed to provide practical guidance for designers on its effective implementation in the post-COVID-19 era, particularly for healthy food products. To understand packaging design for healthy foods in today's market, this study used two main methods starting with direct observation of select healthy food and beverage items available in Thailand to ensure contextual relevance since several studies were conducted outside the Southeast Asia region, followed by a questionnaire addressed to Thai consumers to investigate the importance of packaging design elements influencing consumer purchase decisions. Our findings revealed shifts in the importance of packaging design elements. Graphics and colors were initially believed to make a great impression and stand out from all other similar products, but now, consumers place a higher priority on the appearance of food products in the packaging. Health claims are also more important than attractive colors. This study also gives insights into other packaging design elements, including material, shape, and size. Therefore, this article is relevant to those designers or other scholars interested in studying design, marketing, and communications issues.

References

Food I, Council I. About IFIC Our Mission [Internet]. 2021 [updated 2021 May 19; cited 2021 Dec 08]. Available from: https://foodinsight.org/2021-food-health-survey/

Mai R, Hoffmann S. How to combat the unhealthy = Tasty intuition: The influencing role of health consciousness. J Public Policy Mark. 2015; 34(1): 63–83.

Jantathai S, Sungsri-in M, Mukprasirt A, Duerrschmid K. Sensory expectations and perceptions of Austrian and Thai consumers: A case study with six colored Thai desserts. Food Res Int. 2014; 64: 65–73.

Dadras A. Impact of shapes in packaging design on consumer behaviour in the lens of Kano’s attrac_tive quality theory. Int J Sci Res Manag Stud. 2015; 2(1): 78–86.

Hoyer WD. An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product. J Consum Res. 1984; 11(3): 822.

Klimchuck M., Krasovec S. Desain Kemasan : Perencanaan Merek Produk yang Berhasil Mulai dari Konsep Sampai Penjualan. Text in In. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2006.

Nilsson J, Öström T. Packaging as a Brand Communication Vehicle. 2005.

Ampuero O, Vila N. Consumer perceptions of product packaging. J Consum Mark. 2006; 23(2): 102–14.

Gofman A, Moskowitz HR, Fyrbjork J, Moskowitz D, Mets T. Extending Rule Developing Experimentation to Perception of Food Packages with Eye Tracking. Open Food Sci J. 2009; 3(1): 66–78.

Pinto VRA, Freitas TB de O, Dantas MI de S, Della Lucia SM, Melo LF, Minim VPR, et al. Influence of package and health-related claims on perception and sensory acceptability of snack bars. Food Res Int. 2017; 101(April): 103–13.

Saryono. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Alfabeta; 2010.

US Soybean Export Council. USSEC Worldwide Soy Food Markets Update August, 2020. Ussec. 2020.

Puranabhandu O. Thailand’s Food Trends in 2021. United States Dep Agric Foreign Agric Serv [Internet]. 2021 [updated 2021 Jan 27; cited 2021 Dec 08]. Available from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Thailand%27s Food Trends in 2021_Bangkok_Thailand_01-25-2021

Silayoi P, Speece M. Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. Br Food J. 2004; 106(8): 607–28.

Al-samarraie H, Eldenfria A, Eva J, Ibrahim A, Nasser A. Packaging design elements and consumers ’ decision to buy from the Web : A cause and effect decision-making model. 2019; (July): 1–13.

Aronson G. Consumer behavior in the Covid recovery: Polarizing “moving-on mindsets” within retail [Internet]. 2021 [updated 2021 Jul 28; cited 2021 Dec 08]. Available from: https://nielseniq.com/global/en/insights/commentary/2021/consumer-behavior-in-the-covid-recovery/

Gil-Pérez I, Rebollar R, Lidón I. Without words: the effects of packaging imagery on consumer perception and response. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2020; 33: 69–77.

Kobayashi ML, Benassi M de T. Impact of Packaging Characteristics on Consumer Purchase Intention: Instant Coffee in Refill Packs and Glass Jars. J Sens Stud. 2015; 30(3): 169–80.

Di Cicco F, Zhao Y, Wijntjes MWA, Pont SC, Schifferstein HNJ. A juicy orange makes for a tastier juice: The neglected role of visual material perception in packaging design. Food Qual Prefer. 2021; 88(September 2020): 104086.

Ye N, Morrin M, Kampfer K. From Glossy to Greasy: The Impact of Learned Associations on Perceptions of Food Healthfulness. J Consum Psychol. 2020; 30(1): 96–124.

de Kerpel L, Volles BK, van Kerckhove A. Fats are glossy but does glossiness imply fatness? The influence of packaging glossiness on food perceptions. Foods. 2020; 9(1).

Deng X, Kahn BE. Is Your Product on the Right Side? The “Location Effect” on Perceived Product Heaviness and Package Evaluation. J Mark Res. 2009; 46(6): 725–38.

Otterbring T, Shams P, Wästlund E, Gustafsson A. Left isn’t always right: Placement of pictorial and textual package elements. Br Food J. 2013; 115(8): 1211–25.

Bou-Mitri C, Abdessater M, Zgheib H, Akiki Z. Food packaging design and consumer perception of the product quality, safety, healthiness and preference. Nutr Food Sci. 2021; 51(1): 71–86.

Krishna A, Cian L, Aydınoğlu NZ. Sensory Aspects of Package Design. J Retail. 2017; 93(1): 43–54.

Tijssen I, Zandstra EH, de Graaf C, Jager G. Why a ‘light’ product package should not be light blue: Effects of package colour on perceived healthiness and attractiveness of sugar- and fat-reduced products. Food Qual Prefer. 2017; 59: 46–58.

Mutsikiwa M, Marumbwa J. The Impact of Aesthetics Package Design Elements on Consumer Purchase Decisions: A Case of Locally Produced Dairy Products in Southern Zimbabwe. IOSR J Bus Manag. 2013; 8(5): 64–71.

Tu Y, Yang Z, Ma C. The Taste of Plate: How the Spiciness of Food is Affected by the Color of the Plate Used to Serve It. J Sens Stud. 2016; 31(1): 50–60.

Huang L, Lu J. The Impact of Package Color and the Nutrition Content Labels on the Perception of Food Healthiness and Purchase Intention. J Food Prod Mark. 2016; 22(2): 191–218.

Mead JA, Richerson R. Package color saturation and food healthfulness perceptions. J Bus Res. 2018; 82(January 2017): 10–8.

Mai R, Symmank C, Seeberg-Elverfeldt B. Light and Pale Colors in Food Packaging: When Does This Package Cue Signal Superior Healthiness or Inferior Tastiness? J Retail. 2016; 92(4): 426–44.

Schuldt JP. Does Green Mean Healthy? Nutrition Label Color Affects Perceptions of Healthfulness. Health Commun. 2013; 28(8): 814–21.

Seo JY, Scammon DL. Do green packages lead to misperceptions? The influence of package colors on consumers’ perceptions of brands with environmental claims. Mark Lett. 2017; 28(3): 357–69.

Sucapane D, Roux C, Sobol K. Exploring how product descriptors and packaging colors impact consumers’ perceptions of plant-based meat alternative products. Appetite. 2021; 167: 105590.

Kotler P, Keller K. Marketing Management. 13th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2008.

Dagevos H, Voordouw J. Sustainability and meat consumption: Is reduction realistic? Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2013; 9(2): 60–9.

Smith P., Taylor J. Packaging. In Marketing Communications. London: Kogan Page Limited; 2004. 543–74 p.

Chandon P, Ordabayeva N. Supersize in One Dimension, Downsize in Three Dimensions: Effects of Spatial Dimensionality on Size Perceptions and Preferences. J Mark Res. 2009; 46(6): 739–53.

Raghubir P, Krishna A. Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach? J Mark Res. 1999; 36(3): 313–26.

Bausell RB, Lee WL, Soeken KL, Li YF, Berman BM. Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57(5): 438–46.

Adam MA, Ali K. Impact of Visual Packaging Elements of Packaged Milk on Consumers Buying Behavior. Interdiscip J Contemp Res Bus. 2014; 5(11): 1–45.

Sawyer BD, Dobres J, Chahine N, Reimer B. The great typography bake-off: comparing legibility at-a-glance. Ergonomics. 2020; 63(4): 391–8.

Schifferstein HNJ, Lemke M, de Boer A. An exploratory study using graphic design to communicate consumer benefits on food packaging. Food Qual Prefer. 2022; 97(November 2021): 104458.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-13

How to Cite

Wulansari, D., & Pongpimol, D. . (2023). Designer’s Guide for Healthy Food Packaging Design Concepts after Covid-19 Pandemic. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies) Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 85–102. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gskkuhs/article/view/263137

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Articles)