Vitalizing Classroom Activities for Teaching Business English

Main Article Content

Sureepong Phothongsunan

Abstract

Teachers of Business English are more often than not anticipated to develop customized materials for their EFL/ESL learners coming of age and more eager to be partaking than ever in the new normal and this everchanging proactive learning environment. At times, Business English teachers can well serve to draw learners to certain jargon and business-related vocabulary, offer helpful practices, or provide impetus for engagement in the classroom. A profusion of Business English teachers today endeavor to initiate creative activities that aim to increase learner interaction and interest. This can be an extremely challenging task for new or inexperienced teachers of Business English. This paper is written to provide a framework to help Business English teachers develop bespoke lessons or tasks by making use of accessible published materials, innovative input from EFL/ESL learners in the classroom, and other hands-on classroom-based activities. It is suggested that by adopting this framework, based on the author’s stance and experience, Business English teaching becomes dynamic, creative, and purposeful aligned with the underlying principles of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), which designates that language teaching is ultimately oriented to satisfy learners’ needs.  

Article Details

How to Cite
Phothongsunan, S. (2024). Vitalizing Classroom Activities for Teaching Business English. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(2), 937–944. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/268641
Section
Academic Articles

References

Brookfield, S. (2004). The Getting of Wisdom: What Critically Reflective Teaching is and Why It’s Important. Retrieved Oct 22, 2023, from http://nlu.nl.edu/academics/cas/ace/facultypapters/StephenBrookfield.cfm

Elliott, N., & Higgins, A. (2005). Self And Peer Assessment – Does It Make a Difference to Student Group Work? Nurse Education in Practice, 5(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2004.03.004

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Learned. (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., & Matthews K. E. (2017). Student Perceptions of Communication Skills in Undergraduate Science at An Australian Research-Intensive University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1084492

Oguz, A., & Bahar, O. (2008). The Importance of Using Authentic Materials in Prospective Foreign Language Teacher Training. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 328-336.

Ray, M. (2018). Teaching Economics Using ‘Cases’–Going Beyond the ‘Chalk-And Talk’ Method. International Review of Economics Education, 27, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2017.12.001

Sobkowiak, P. (2008). Issues In ESP: Designing A Model for Teaching English for Business Purposes. Poznan: Wydawnictwo UAM.

Tsang, A. (2020). Enhancing Learners’ Awareness of Oral Presentation (Delivery) Skills in the Context of Self-Regulated Learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874177312

Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons Learned: Implementing the Case Teaching Method in A Mechanical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01042.x

Zhang, S., & Hasim Z. (2022). Gamification in EFL/ESL Instruction: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030790