Causal Factors and Guidelines for Using Internet of Things (IoT) Technology in School Administration: The Secondary Educational Service Area Lower Central Region 1
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to analyze (1) the relationship between factors and the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in educational institution administration; the Secondary Educational Service Area Lower Central Region 1; and (2) causal factors that influence the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in educational institution administration. The Secondary Educational Service Area, Lower Central Region 1. This study was quantitative research. The conceptual framework was based on Administrative Skills for School Administrators, Self-Efficacy Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Technology Acceptance Model. The samples were a simple random sampling method that was applied to select 554 education personnel in the Secondary Educational Service Area Lower Central Region 1 to answer the questionnaire. The tools used in the research were online questionnaires. This study was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. Inferential statistics and analyzed the data using structural equation modeling. The research results were found as follows:
1. Results of research on the relationship between factors and the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in educational institution administration. Under the jurisdiction of the Lower Central Secondary Educational Service Area Office 1, it consisted of 4 important theories: administrative skills of school administrators, self-efficacy theory, planned behavior theory, and technology acceptance model theory. It was composed of 14 factors that were statistically significant.
2. The results of the analysis of causal factors influencing the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology, consisting of 14 factors, were in good agreement with the empirical data. Considering the SRMR value = 49, RMSEA value = 0.106, and CFI value = 0.767, causing the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in educational institution administration. Effectively under the Lower Central Secondary Educational Service Area Office 1.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Akbulut, Y., Şendag, S., Birinci, G., Kiliçer, K., Şahin, M. C., & Odabaşi, H. F. (2008). Exploring the Types and Reasons of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Among Turkish Undergraduate Students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (IT@ADS). Computers & Education, 51(1), 463-473.
Aldowah, H., Ul Rehman, S., Ghazal, S., & Naufal Umar, I. (2017). Internet of Things in Higher Education: A Study on Future Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 892(1), 12017.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Dai, H. M., Teo, T., & Rappa, N. A. (2020). Understanding Continuance Intention Among MOOC Participants: The Role of Habit and MOOC Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106455.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw. P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Higher Education Context. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(4), 444-458.
Katz, R. L. (2005). Skills of an Effective Administrator. Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 92-102.
Kaur, A., Bhatia, M., & Stea, G. (2022). A Survey of Smart Classroom Literature. Education Sciences, 12(2), 86.
Krishnan, S., Khunborrisut, P., & Kim, H. N. (2021). IoT Adoption in Education: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption Intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6969-6992.
Lee, I., Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431-440.
Lee, K., Tsai, M., Lanting, M. C., & LI, H. C. (2019). Examining The Factors Influencing Cloud Technology Adoption in Universities. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 7(1).
Park, E., Cho, Y., Han, J., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Comprehensive Approaches to User Acceptance of Internet of Things in A Smart Home Environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 2342–2350.
Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Adapting The Technology Acceptance Model to Evaluate the Innovative Potential of e-learning Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 614-622.
Reddy, S. S., Karumuri, V., & Jirli, N. M. (2022). Exploring The Factors Influencing Secondary School Teachers' Intention to Use Digital Media in Classroom Teaching. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(2), 239-260.
Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An Investigation of The Factors That Influence Preservice Teachers' Intentions and Integration of Web 2.0 Tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-64.
Singh, A., & Mushtaq, R. (2020). Role of Leadership in Integrating Internet of Things (IoT) in Educational Institutions. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(2), 2737-2746.
Tan, S. C. (2010). School Technology Leadership Competencies: Principals' Perceptions, Availability and Needs. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 35, 57-71.
Teo, T. (2011). Factors Influencing Teachers' Intention to Use Technology: Model Development and Test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding The Relationship Between Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs and Technology Use in Education: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.
Wong, K.T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2020). Exploring Attitudes Towards Cloud-Based Analytics in A Higher Education Context. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(4), 444-458.
Wong, K.T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2013). Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of The UTAUT Model to Student Teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 1-10.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Yunus, Y., Umaya, N. M., Kuntari, R., Hidayat, R., & Suhendi, H. Y. (2020). Internet of Things for School Operational Management. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(23), 158-172.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2010). Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.