The Post-Pandemic Classroom: Challenges and Opportunities for Thai University Lecturers

Main Article Content

Lim Chong Ewe
Mohammad Amin Dadras
Selina Wong Mei Ling

บทคัดย่อ

This article aimed to study (1) Thai university lecturers’ experiences with technology during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) lecturers’ perceptions regarding pedagogical changes due to online teaching, and (3) assessment adaptations in post-pandemic higher education. The sample was three university lecturers from southern Thailand selected by purposive sampling based on their involvement in online teaching during and post-pandemic. The instrument for collecting data was face-to-face interviews adapted from Rapanta et al. (2021). Data analysis was conducted through descriptive content analysis. The results indicated that 1) lecturers significantly adapted to digital technology, integrating platforms like Zoom, MS Teams, and Google Drive into regular teaching, enhancing flexibility and educational inclusivity; 2) lecturers experienced a shift from traditional instructor roles to facilitators, embracing hybrid teaching models and student independence, yet faced challenges in managing simultaneous onsite and online classes; and 3) assessment methods diversified post-pandemic, incorporating digital submissions and multimedia evaluations, although academic dishonesty emerged as a significant concern. This study underscores the necessity for institutional support, professional development, and continuous evaluation of technology-integrated pedagogies in higher education to sustain advancements made during the pandemic.

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Ewe, L. C., Dadras, M. A., & Ling, S. W. M. (2025). The Post-Pandemic Classroom: Challenges and Opportunities for Thai University Lecturers. วารสารสหวิทยาการมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์, 8(4), 1392–1404. สืบค้น จาก https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/279431
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Amoah, P. A., & Mok, K. H. (2020, 13 June). The COVID-19 pandemic and internationalisation of higher education: International students’ knowledge, experiences and wellbeing. Retrieved from www.hepi.ac.uk/2020/06/13weekend-reading-thecovid-19-pandemic-and-internationalisation-of-higher-education-students-knowledgeexperiences-and-wellbeing/

Anaraki, F., Dadras, M., Pinto, C. R., Manomat, T., & Amirkhani, M. (2024). Social Media in Education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Management and Tourism, 8(2), 191–198. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijmmt/article/view/276259

Asgari, H., Gupta, R., Titiloye, I., & Xia, J. (2022). Challenges, perceptions, and future preferences for post-secondary online education given experiences in the COVID-19 outbreak. Computational Urban Science, 2(29). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00058-7

Bangkok Post. (2020, 1 May). Pandemic is exposing the gaps in Thai education. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1910956/pandemic-is-exposing-the-gaps-in-thai-education

Blonder, R., Feldman-Maggor, Y., & Rap, S. (2022). What can be learned from lecturers’ knowledge and self-efficacy for online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic to promote online teaching in higher education. PloS one, 17(10), e0275459. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275459

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Damşa, C., Langford, M., Uehara, D., & Scherer, R. (2021). Teachers’ agency and online education in times of crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106793

Chulalongkorn University. (2020, 19 March). Chula is ready to go online full-scale. https://www.chula.ac.th/en/news/28392/

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Gonzales, A. L., McCrory Calarco, J., & Lynch, T. (2020). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication Research, 47(5), 750–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796366

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hollander, J. B. (2021, 23 January). The pandemic is taking higher education back to school. University World News. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20210118070559840

Ironsi, C. S. (2022). Navigating learners towards technology-enhanced learning during post-COVID-19 semesters. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 29, 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2022.100189

Nworie, J. (2021, 19 May). Beyond COVID-19: What’s next for online teaching and learning in higher education?. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/5/beyond-covid-19-whats-next-for-online-teaching-and-learning-in-higher-education

Kahveci, A., Gilmer, P. J., & Southerland, S. A. (2008) Understanding chemistry professors’ use of educational technologies: An activity theoretical approach. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 325-351, DOI: 10.1080/09500690601188638

Lohr, A., Stadler, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., Chernikova, O., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., & Sailer, M. (2021). On powerpointers, clickerers, and digital pros: Investigating the initiation of digital learning activities by teachers in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106715

Minahan, J. (2020). Maintaining connections, and reducing anxiety while school is closed. Educational Leadership: Special Report, 77(2), 22-27.

Mok, K. H. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on higher education: Critical reflections. Higher Education Policy, 35, 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-022-00285-x

Protopsaltis, S., & Baum, S. (2019). Does online education live up to its promise? A look at the evidence and implications for federal policy. Center for Educational Policy Evaluation.

Rabbi, M.F., Smita, M.K., & Mohammad, S. (2020). Using social networking sites as a medium of instruction at tertiary education during COVID-19 situation in Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(3), 258-264. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.741644

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3, 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1

Ratnaningsih, N., Ni’Mah, K., & Hidayat, E. (2021). COVID-19 the earliest for digital learning in mathematics: An overview from technology literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/1/012027

Rideout, V., & Katz, V.S. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. A report of the Families and Media Project. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. Retrieved from https://joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content /themes/jgcc/downloader.php?file=/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/jgcc_opportunityforall.pdf

Tomczyk, Ł. (2020). Skills in the area of digital safety as a key component of digital literacy among teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09980-6

UNESCO. (2020a). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response

UNESCO. (2020b). Extraordinary session of the global education meeting, education post-COVID-19: 2020 global education meeting declaration. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374704