The Relationship Between ESG Scores and Firm Value of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand and the Indonesia Stock Exchange

Main Article Content

Yodsawinkan Kobkanjanapued

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance scores and firm value (Tobin’s Q) and compare this relationship between listed companies on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Adopting a quantitative research approach, the study utilizes a sample of 1,129 firm-year observations from both exchanges. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and panel data regression with a Fixed Effects Model.


The findings reveal that 1) ESG scores have a statistically significant positive relationship with firm value. This reflects that sustainability performance effectively creates value added and enhances stakeholder confidence. 2) There is no statistically significant difference in the relationship between ESG scores and firm value between Thailand and Indonesia. This indicates that capital market mechanisms in both countries respond to ESG factors with a consistent direction and magnitude. Research Findings and Implications:


The results suggest that capital markets in ASEAN emerging economies are moving toward a unified integration of sustainability valuation standards. These findings are beneficial for executives in establishing ESG as a core corporate strategy to enhance firm value. Furthermore, they provide a framework for regulators to collaborate on defining regional disclosure standards to effectively attract international sustainable investment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kobkanjanapued, Y. (2026). The Relationship Between ESG Scores and Firm Value of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand and the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(4), 1885–1909. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/286967
Section
Research Articles

References

Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910

Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716

Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006

E-Vahdati, S., Wan-Hussin, W. N., & Mohd Ariffin, M. S. (2023). The value relevance of ESG practices in Japan and Malaysia: Moderating roles of CSR award, and former CEO as a board chair. Sustainability, 15(3), 2728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032728

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180

Grewal, J., Hauptmann, C., & Serafeim, G. (2021). Material sustainability information and stock price informativeness. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(3), 513-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04451-2

Kamnan, S., & Jaroenwiriyakul, S. (2022). Factors affecting on the saving in ASEAN-5. Santapol College Academic Journal, 8(1), 18–27.

Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007

Loderer, C., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance [MPRA Paper No. 26450]. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26450/

Marciano, D., Wijaya, L. I., Sugianto, L. L., & Zunairoh, Z. (2025). The effect of behavioral factors on investment decision towards stock market between Indonesia, Japan, and Thailand. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 29(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol29.iss2.art4

Masyhuri, M. (2017). Is Thailand better than Indonesia? A comparative study between the listed state-owned enterprises (SOEs) corporate governance practices on disclosures and transparency. International Business Management, 11(11), 1795–1807. Retrieved from https://makhillpublications.co/files/published-files/mak-ibm/2017/11-1795-1807.pdf

Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030574

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1809167

Nikmah, U., & Khasanah, U. (2025). Assessing the value relevance of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance from a religiosity perspective. Global Business Review, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509251346197

Nur’aeni, N., & Sari, W. (2023). The effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) on firm value in companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Indonesian Journal of Economics and Management, 4(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.35313/ijem.v4i1.5479

Sahlian, D. N., Popa, A. F., Banţa, V. C., Răpan, C. M., & Chiriac, S. C. V. (2024). The value relevance of financial performance and ESG scores during tumultuous economic periods. Eastern European Economics, 62(4), 528-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2225500

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.

Suryanto, D., & Wardah, N. C. (2023). Comparison of daily transaction performance of Indonesia stock exchange against Singapore, Thailand, and Philippines stock exchanges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings 2022, 83, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083070

Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635

Zheng, Y., Wang, B., Sun, X., & Li, X. (2022). ESG performance and corporate value: Analysis from the stakeholders’ perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1084632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1084632