THE INDICATORS OF BRAHMAVIHARA CHANGING LEADERSHIP OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS UNDER THE BANGKOK METROPOLITAN ADMINISTRATION

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: 1) to develop indicators and to model the structural relationship of indicators Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under Bangkok  Metropolitan Administration, 2) to test the coherence of the structural relationship model of the indicators Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration with developed by empirical data, 3) to identify the indicator element and indicator behaviors with structural integrity or the element's weight value according to the specified criteria and, 4) to study the guidelines for Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration by the mixed methods research; qualitative research and quantitative research. The sample group used in the research was educational institutions under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration totaling 205 schools. The informants consist of school administration, academic supervisors and teachers totaling 615 persons. Two sets of data collection tools were: 1) the questionnaire on Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, 2) structured interview form collected the data in 2020. The statistics used for data analysis are Mean, Standard deviation, Coefficient of Variation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis using a statistical package.

              The results of the research were as follows:

                            1) To develop the indicators and model the structural relationship of indicators Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. To selected for the structural relation model using the mean criterion equal to or greater than 3.00 and the distribution coefficient equal to or less than 20%. The result of separate element consists as 1) ideological influence with Brahmavihara.  It consists of 4 indicators namely; ideological influence that consists of loving-kindness, ideological Influence with compassion, ideological influence consisting of sympathetic joy and, ideological influence consisting of equanimity. 2) inspirational components of Brahmavihara. It consists of 4 indicators namely; inspirational kindness, inspirational compassion, inspiration sympathetic joy and inspiration consisting of equanimity. 3) intellectual stimulation component consists of Brahmavihara. It consists of 4 indicators namely; the intellectual stimulation of kindness, intellectual stimulation of compassion, intellectual stimulation sympathetic joy and intellectual stimulation consists of equanimity. 4) The elements considering the individuality consists of Brahmavihara. It consists of 4 indicators namely; consideration of individual with kindness, consideration of the individual with compassion, consideration of the individuality with sympathetic joy, consideration of the individuality with equanimity.

          2) The results of the confirmatory component analysis of the 4 models revealed to all models according to the research hypothesis were very consistent with the empirical data. In addition, the component weights of all indicators were statistically significant. It was shown that all of these indicators were important indicators Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration.

          3) The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis model. The indicators Brahmavihara changing leadership of school administrators under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration was found that all 16 indicators had a statistically significant positive correlation at the .01 level (p < .01). The highest correlation indicator was ideological influence with kindness and compassion having a correlation coefficient of 0.705, while the least correlation indicator was motivational with kindness and consideration of the individuality with compassion has a correlation coefficient of 0.140

          4) The results obtained from the data analysis of 4 components mentioned above. The experts have opinions and practice as well as encouraging personnel to apply all components and indicators to practice in actual operations. It was consistent or in the same direction as the research results that researcher has developed.