World Order in Times of Change
Keywords:
World Order, Liberal, Realist, Constructivist, International Political EconomyAbstract
This article rigorously examines the dynamic nature of the global order using a comprehensive theoretical framework that includes realism, liberalism, constructivism, and international political economy. Through meticulous analysis, valuable insights are provided into the diverse perspectives on the global order and the political behaviors of individual nations in the international arena. The findings highlight the considerable challenges confronting the traditional liberal world order, historically led by the United States and Western nations since the Cold War's conclusion. These challenges stem from shifts in power dynamics, the emergence of new global actors, declining influence of international organizations, and rapid technological advancements.
As a result, the established liberal world order faces significant disruptions, prompting states to actively pursue alternative global orders aligned with their unique preferences. Policymakers must carefully assess the challenges posed by this multifaceted and comprehensive new world order. This article provides crucial insights into global trends and offers specific recommendations for Thailand in politics, society, and the economy. These recommendations involve expanding cooperative frameworks, conducting thorough policy reviews, engaging in international institutional mechanisms, and fostering technological capabilities to ensure Thailand’s continued development aligns with the evolving global order.
References
Andersen, M. S., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2021). Balance of power: A key concept in historical perspective. In Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations (pp. 289-301). Routledge.
Andreu, M., & Brassett, J. (2020). International Political Economy (IPE). The Routledge Handbook to Rethinking Ethics in International Relations, 39.
Barkin, J. S., & Sjoberg, L. (2019). International Relations' Last Synthesis? Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches. Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, R. (2019). Liberalism. In Contemporary political ideologies (pp. 23-49). Routledge.
Blitz, J., Brunsden, J., & Hughes, L. (2019). Brexit timeline: Key dates in the UK’s divorce from the EU. Financial Times Online.
Block, F. (2008). Polanyi’s double movement and the reconstruction of critical theory. Revue interventions économiques. Papers in political economy, 38: 1–14.
Blyth, M. (Ed.). (2009). Routledge handbook of international political economy (IPE): IPE as a global conversation. Routledge.
Buch-Hansen, H., & Nielsen, P. (2020). Critical realism: Basics and beyond. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Busch, M. L., & Reinhardt, E. (2003). Developing countries and general agreement on tariffs and trade/world trade organization dispute settlement. J. World Trade, 37, 719.
Carr, E. H. (1951), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, London: Macmillan.
Center, W. (2018). The Key Problem of Our Time: A Conversation with Henry Kissinger on Sino-US Relations. (5, October 2019). Retrieved from https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/the-key-problem-our-time-conversation-henry-kissinger-sino-us-relations.
Chandler, D. (2013). Promoting democratic norms? Social constructivism and the subjective limits to liberalism. Democratization, 20(2), 215-239.
Choi, H. (2021). President Biden and climate change: policy and issues. Available at SSRN 3847183.
Cui, S., & Buzan, B. (2016). Great power management in international society. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(2), 181-210.
Haass, R. (2021). The age of America first: Washington's flawed new foreign policy consensus. Foreign Aff., 100, 85.
Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International organization, 41(3), 491-517.
Haynes, J. (2021). Religion and International Relations: What do we Know and how do we Know it?. Religions, 12(5), 328.
Holm, H. H. (2019). Whose world order?: uneven globalization and the end of the Cold War. Routledge.
Hooghe, L., Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2019). Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 731-743.
Htun, M., & Ossa, J. P. (2013). Political inclusion of marginalized groups: indigenous reservations and gender parity in Bolivia. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 4-25.
Hussain, N., Waseem, R., & Ahmad, R. (2022). Destabilizing Unipolar World And Emergence Of Multi-Polarity: Theoretical Debate. Webology (ISSN: 1735-188X), 19(3).
Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). Why the liberal world order will survive. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), 17-29.
Kenneth Waltz. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House, pp. 104-105.
Kirshner, J. (2012). The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European journal of international relations, 18(1), 53-75.
Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. New York: Penguin Press. Comillas Journal of International Relations, (10), 91-92.
Knock, T. (2019). To End All Wars, New Edition: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. Princeton University Press.
Kulkarni, A., Sanzgiri, A., & Jha, V. (2021). International Political Economy of Covid-19 Vaccine: Issues & Challenges. Hmlyan Jr Eco Bus Mgn, 2(2), 17-23.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of democracy, 13(2), 51-65.
Lilyblad, C. M. (2019). NGOs in constructivist international relations theory. Routledge handbook of NGOs and international relations, 113-127.
Lombardo, E., & Kantola, J. (2021). Social constructivism. In The Routledge handbook of gender and EU politics (pp. 43-55). Routledge.
Mansfield, E. D., & Rudra, N. (2021). Embedded liberalism in the digital era. International Organization, 75(2), 558-585.
Massad, J. A. (2020). Islam in liberalism. University of Chicago Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007). Structural realism. International relations theories: Discipline and diversity, 83, 77-94.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International security, 43(4), 7-50.
Milner, H. V., & Kubota, K. (2005). Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in developing countries. International Organization, 59(1), 107-143.
Moravcsik, A. (2020). Liberal intergovernmentalism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Morris, S. (2023). Development finance cooperation amidst great power competition: what role for the World Bank?. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(2), 379-388.
Ojekemi, O. S., Rjoub, H., Awosusi, A. A., & Agyekum, E. B. (2022). Toward a sustainable environment and economic growth in BRICS economies: do innovation and globalization matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(38), 57740-57757.
Sørensen, G. (2006). What kind of world order? The international system in the new millennium. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(4), 343-363.
Van Wyk, J. A., Kinghorn, L., Hepburn, H., Payne, C., & Sham, C. (2007). The international politics of nuclear weapons: A constructivist analysis. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 35(1).
Vivares, E. (Ed.). (2020). The Routledge handbook to the global political economy: Conversations and Inquiries. Routledge.
Vreeland, J.R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Office of the Ombudsman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Content published in the journal is personal opinions of authors which the office of Ombudsman and the editorial team are not bound to be accordance with.
- Articles, content, images, etc. published in the Journal of Ombudsman are copyright of the Journal. If any person or entity wants to bring all or part of it to publish or to do any action. Must obtain written permission from the journal's first.
