Enactivism and the Gap แนวคิดปฏิสังสรรค์กระทำการกับปัญหาเรื่องช่องว่าง

Abstract

This paper tries to defend autopoietic enactivism from a set of arguments against it put forward by sensorimotor enactivism.  Due to the fact that both positions aim to solve  problem of the gap between our knowledge of physical facts and our knowledge of phenomenal facts. Even though both of them try to counter this problem by asserting that knowledge of phenomenal facts relating to knowledge of phenomenal facts is supposed to be knowledge of interactions between the body and its environment rather than any knowledge of brain process, there is a set of internal controversy concerning whether the body in the alleged interactions should be a kind of self-production system.  While autopoietic enactivism answers it in positive way, sensorimotor enactivism argues against it by use the idea of adaptivity.