The Subjectivity and Conformity Issues in Contemporary Practices of Algorithmic Creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/jucr.2026.7Keywords:
Algorithmic Creativity; Robotic Performances; AI; Conformity; Brain-Computer Interface; AuthorshipAbstract
This article examines the issue of subjectivity and conformism in algorithmic cultural practices (robotic performances and neurocomputer installations “A3 K3 Dragan Ilic," “Alone Together," “NOOR” and “AIBO”). The focus is on the technological features of algorithmic creativity, which is based on machine learning, stylistic imitation and computational data processing. In this context, ethical and legal issues related to copyright and the recognition of artistic works created by artificial intelligence are analyzed. In particular, mechanized artistic practices create the illusion of autonomous creativity, whilst retaining the decisive role of human subjectivity in the organization and interpretation of cultural processes. Algorithmic creativity remains dependent on human programming, technological mediation and artistic conception. However, the creative process involving BCI may take on characteristics of subjectivity. This is evidenced by court rulings on the determination of subjectivity and copyright in works created through algorithmic computations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors authorize the JUCR to publish their materials both in print and online while retaining their full individual copyright. The copyright of JUCR volumes is retained by Chulalongkorn University.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policies or opinions of the Journal (JUCR), it editors and staff, Chulalongkorn University, or Osaka Metropolitan University.



