Problems of Hearing Opinions and Assessing the Impacts of Enacting
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is a qualitative research by studying documents from the law. Academic textbooks, research papers, information from websites on the Internet Both of Thailand and other countries regarding hearing opinions and assessing the impact of legislation Conduct in-depth interviews for information on problem analysis. Conclusions and recommendations.
According to research studies, it is found that the process of enacting the law under the 2017 Constitution, Section 77, paragraph two, is required before the enactment The State should arrange for a hearing of the opinions of relevant persons. Analyze the potential impact of the law in a comprehensive and systematic manner. This is the RIA system or assessment of the impact of legislation. With a prototype from the United States There are 3 main steps which are to distribute information to the public. Open to hear opinions from the public. And the publication of the final draft law but there is a problem though The body that proposed the bill does not understand the RIA and does not have a central agency that examines the quality of public hearings by government agencies. Make an assessment of the impact of laws such as the United States, the US Presidential Office As the main unit And Australia has the Best Practice Regulatory Office overseeing both Section 77, paragraph two and the Regulatory Commission Act and the Evaluation of Law 2019, Section 5, paragraph three, does not set the stage or The time to listen to opinions as well. So now If to propose a draft law for public hearing management Must follow the Minister's resolution Which requires that the hearing of opinions must be heard through the information technology system of that agency for at least 15 days, which is of the opinion that too little, therefore, incomplete information from the public, the stakeholders In order to resolve the issue, a central agency must be established to examine the quality of public hearing. Set a period of 30 days for comment exposure and the amount of information that will be available to be collected from at least 500 commenters.
Article Details
References
สุรชัย ตรงงาม.(2560). ภาคประชาชน เผยรัฐเปิดฟังความเห็นร่างกฎหมายขัดรัฐธรรมนูญ ขู่ฟ้องศาลเพิกถอนมติคณะรัฐมนตรี. สืบค้นเมื่อ 8 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2561, จาก https://ilaw.or.th/node/4547.
อรวรรณ เกษร.(2561). กระบวนการตรากฎหมายตามรัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย พุทธศักราช 2560 : การเสนอร่างกฎหมาย. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2561, จาก https://www.parliament.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/elaw_parcy/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=1851
Thailaw. (2561). ขั้นตอนการร่างกฎหมาย. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2561, จาก http://www.thailaws.com.