Victims’ Rights in the Justice Process: A Comparative Study between Thailand and the United Kingdom

Main Article Content

Chirapan Pimwanwong

Abstract

At present, although Thailand has enacted legislation concerning the protection of victims’ rights in criminal justice proceedings, such as the Criminal Procedure Code and the Act on Compensation and Expenses for Injured Persons and Defendants in Criminal Cases B.E. 2544 (2001) , such legislation remains subject to a number of limitations. These include, inter alia, the lack of effective enforcement, the failure to adequately encompass psychological and social rights, the existence of overly complex procedural requirements, as well as the absence of specific legislation that systematically safeguards victims’ rights. Consequently, a considerable number of victims are deprived of genuine access to the rights to which they are legally entitled.This article examines the factual and legal dimensions of victims’ rights in Thailand, with a comparative perspective on the United Kingdom, where victim protection has evolved under the concepts of victim-centered justice and restorative justice. The study employs a comparative legal analysis, focusing on key instruments in the United Kingdom, namely the Victims’ Code, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA), and the Victim Personal Statement (VPS).The findings demonstrate that Thailand’s system remains primarily oriented toward legal procedures and financial compensation, while the United Kingdom emphasizes victims’ active participation throughout the justice process and provides more holistic forms of redress. Based on the comparative analysis, the article proposes reforms for Thailand, including the enactment of comprehensive legislation to guarantee victims’ rights in all dimensions, the establishment of an independent supervisory body, the creation of one-stop victim service centers, and the development of a case-status notification system. Such reforms would enhance the effectiveness, comprehensiveness, and alignment of Thailand’s victim protection framework with international standards.


 


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Pimwanwong, C. (2025). Victims’ Rights in the Justice Process: A Comparative Study between Thailand and the United Kingdom. WESTERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES and SOCIAL SCIENCE, 11(2), 257–270. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/WTURJ/article/view/282516
Section
บทความวิชาการ

References

สำนักงานกิจการยุติธรรม. (2563). คู่มือการให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้เสียหายในคดีอาญา. กระทรวงยุติธรรม.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการกฤษฎีกา. (2566). ประมวลกฎหมายวิธีพิจารณาความอาญา ฉบับปรับปรุงล่าสุด. สืบค้นเมือ 16 กรกฎาคม 2568, จาก http://www.krisdika.go.th

Beloof, B. (1999). Victim participation in criminal justice: Constitutional values. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(3), 293–305.

GOV.UK. (2024a). Apply for criminal injuries compensation. Retrieved June 20,2025, from https://www.gov.uk/claim-compensation-criminal-injury.

GOV.UK. (2024b). Your rights as a victim of crime. Retrieved June 25,2025, from https://www.gov.uk/your-rights-if-youre-a-victim-of-crime

Home Office. (2020). Code of practice for victims of crime in England and Wales (Victims’ Code). Retrieved May 5,2025, from

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-code-of-practice-for-victims-of-crime.

Human Rights Development Foundation. (2019). Access to Justice for Vulnerable Victims in Thailand. Retrieved May 20,2025, from

https://hrdfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/HRDF_Final-victim-compensation.pdf.

International Commission of Jurists. (2008). Thailand Criminal Procedure Code. . Retrieved June 20,2025, from

https://www.samuiforsale.com/law-texts/thai-criminal-procedure-code.html

Manikis, M. (2015). Victim participation in criminal justice: Real rights or rhetoric. Canadian Journal of Human Rights, 4(1), 1–28.

Ministry of Justice. (2021). The Code of Practice for Victims of Crime in England and Wales (Victims’ Code). Retrieved June 20,2025, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-code-of-practice-for-victims-of-crime

Ministry of Justice. (2023). Victim Contact Scheme guidance. Retrieved June 15,2025, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/victim-contact-scheme-guidance

NCJRS. (2005). Use and application of the United Nations Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power – twenty years after its adoption. Retrieved June 20,2025, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse.

PDLegal. (2024). Victim rights in Thai criminal proceedings. Retrieved June 10,2025, from https://www.pdlegal.com.sg/thailand-criminal-proceedings-series-no-1-rights-of-a-victim/.

Restorative justice. (2025). In Wikipedia. Retrieved May 5,2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restorative_justice.

UN General Assembly. (1985). Declaration of basic principles of justice for victims of crime and abuse of power (A/RES/40/34). Retrieved June 10,2025, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse-power

United Nations Asia and Far East Institute (UNAFEI). (2005). Revisiting Victim Rights in the Criminal Justice Process. Retrieved June 20,2025, from https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No70/No70_05VE_Watanavanich.pdf