miss A Study of Organizational Efficiency for Sustainable Management via STAR STEMS Intellectual Innovation Frame workTitle

Main Article Content

Thitawee Tesapurana
Pornpan Seethian

Abstract

This article aims to: 1) study and analyze the level of organizational efficiency in sustainability management through the STAR STEMS intellectual innovation tool; 2) evaluate the outcomes of applying STAR STEMS to develop personnel potential and organizational management; and 3) propose guidelines for developing organizations toward sustainability in alignment with international standards and the Thai socio-geographical context. This study employed a mixed-methods research approach. The sample consisted of personnel from the Human Resources Department and the Safety, Occupational Health, and Environment Department of 44 industrial factories, selected through purposive sampling. The research instruments comprised questionnaires and interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistics, including correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The findings revealed that the overall level of organizational efficiency in sustainability management was high ()= 4.21, S.D. = 0.58). The dimension with the highest mean score was innovation and adaptability, followed by social and environmental responsibility and management, respectively. Furthermore, STAR STEMS significantly predicted organizational efficiency in sustainability management at the .01 significance level, explaining 68.40% of the variance in organizational efficiency (SR2 = 0.684, p < .01). The components of scientific thinking and responsibility had the greatest influence on organizational efficiency. The development guidelines should focus on enhancing human capital through STAR STEMS, together with promoting an ESG-oriented organizational culture and learning innovation through the Situation-Based Learning (SBL) process.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tesapurana , T., & Seethian, P. (2026). miss A Study of Organizational Efficiency for Sustainable Management via STAR STEMS Intellectual Innovation Frame workTitle. WESTERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES and SOCIAL SCIENCE, 12(2), 119–134. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/WTURJ/article/view/287420
Section
Research Articles

References

ตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย. (2564). แนวทางการดำเนินงานด้านความยั่งยืนสำหรับบริษัทจดทะเบียน (ESG guidelines). ตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย.

พหล สง่าเนตร และคณะ. (2567). รายงานผลการดำเนินงานหลักการและแนวทางการปฏิบัตินวัตกรรมทางปัญญา STAR STEMS สำหรับการสร้างสังคมรู้ รัก สามัคคี มีสันติสุขยั่งยืน. คณะกรรมาธิการการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม วุฒิสภา.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303

Eccles Robert G., Ioannou & Serafeim. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Gary Hamel. (2000). Leading the revolution. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3),212-21310. https://doi.org/1016/S0737-6782(01)00097-2

John R. Schermerhorn Jr., James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn. (2000). Basic Organizational Behavior. Publisher: John Whiley and Sons

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Pfeffer, J. (1998). The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Harvard Business School Press.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review,

(1–2), 62–77.

Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.