The Concept of Moral Agency on Social Network According to the Perspective of Buddhist Ethics

Abstract

                This research aims to study dilemmas of moral agency arising on online social network which can be expressed in two distinct forms: taking action and mentally taking action. These forms encompass five primary facets, namely: 1) posting, 2) information sharing, 3) commenting, 4) having right view, and 5) having wrong view. As active participants on social media platforms, individuals voluntarily engage in discussions or contribute to emerging issues aligning with their personal interests. Notably, the actor in this context operates independent of imposed thought patterns, enjoying the freedom of self-determination and dissociating from the moral agent's obligation to adhere to prescribed practices. According to the perspective of Buddhist ethics, embodying moral agency entails adherence to two primary concepts: individual Dhamma and societal ethics. It represents the benchmark for exhibiting virtuous conduct. Consequently, Sammādiṭṭhi serves as a guiding principle to foster righteous viewpoints. In the context of moral agents within the realm of social media, the most commendable individuals are those users capable of engaging in conscientious thinking, undertaking beneficial actions, and being blameless.