Fake News: Government Policy Recommendations from Case Studies in 6 Countries across 6 Continents
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fake news is a major problem in the modern era, as online media has become the primary source of news. Many countries are trying to find solutions to the problem, including Thailand. However, the methods that the Thai government has been using so far may not be effective, and other approaches may need to be considered. This academic article studies the meaning and the development of fake news and how other countries have attempted to solve this problem in online media, including Singapore, Australia, Finland, Kenya, Canada, and Brazil, by analyzing documents to propose solutions to the Thai government. The study found that fake news has developed in four eras, corresponding to the progress of technology. It also found that fake news is defined as non-factual information which might be false, misleading, or intentionally harmful. There have been two main approaches to solving the problem of fake news: government intervention and empowerment of the people. No direct research has proved which approach is more effective, but an indirect assessment from the annual freedom index indicates that democratic governments would use the methods that restrict freedom as little as possible. This study, therefore, recommends that the Thai government consider using the methods that empower the people to prevent the creation of fake news from political and economic factors as well as for the country's democratic image. This can be done by using a combination of methods and cooperating with other sectors, which consist of educating people about media literacy and encouraging them to verify information, establishing task forces to combat fake news, supporting quality journalism by allowing independence, and collaborating with technology companies. These approaches should lead to more sustainable solutions in the long run.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
กระทรวงดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรษฐกิจและสังคม. (2565). รายงานผลการสำรวจพฤติกรรมผู้ใช้อินเทอร์เน็ตในประเทศไทย ปี 2565. กรุงเทพฯ: สํานักงานพัฒนาธุรกรรมทางอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ กระทรวงดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรษฐกิจและสังคม.
เบญจวรรณ คุณวิโรจน์ลักษณ์, ศุภกิจ อิศดิศัย, และอานนท์ ทับเที่ยง. (2563). ปัจจัยที่ช่วยลดการแพร่กระจายข่าวปลอมบนสื่อสังคมออนไลน์. วารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชพฤกษ์, 6(2), 196-213.
รัฐบาลไทย. (2565). “ดีอีเอส” เปิดสถิติ”เฟคนิวส์” ปี 2565 พบข่าวปลอมนโยบายภาครัฐครองแชมป์สูงสุด. สืบค้นจาก https://www.thaigov.go.th/news/contents/details/63331.
วรพจน์ วงศ์กิจรุ่งเรือง, และพรรษาสิริ กุหลาบ. (2563). ศึกษาเรื่องโครงการสำรวจองค์ความรู้ด้านข่าวลวง ข้อมูลบิดเบือน และข้อมูลผิดพลาด และกรณีศึกษาด้านสุขภาพของไทย. สืบค้นจาก https://blog.cofact.org/081063/?fbclid=IwAR3Wl7XaA4FIz2dnUVoMYBnIudHoojP2clglufvZ-glseB9X4a0va7hNX1k.
สถาบันพระปกเกล้า. (2565). ความรู้เบื้องต้นการปกครองในระบอบประชาธิปไตยอันมีพระมหากษัตริย์ทรงเป็นประมุข. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันพระปกเกล้า.
สำนักงานราชบัณฑิตยสภา. (2552). การเรียกชื่อประเทศ. สืบค้นจาก http://legacy.orst.go.th/?knowledges=การเรียกชื่อประเทศ-๑๑-พฤ.
สุนันทา แย้มทัพ, และอรัญญา ศิริผล. (2564). ข่าวปลอมกับการทำงานของนักข่าวในยุคดิจิทัล. วารสารศาสตร์, 14(2), 120-144.
เสาวภาคย์ รัตนพงศ์. (2563). การศึกษาลักษณะของข่าวปลอมที่เผยแพร่ผ่านสื่อออนไลน์ในประเทศไทยและแนวทางการรับมือ (วิทยานิพนธ์มหาบัณฑิต). สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์, กรุงเทพฯ.
Abdullah, N. A., Nishioka, D., Tanaka, Y., & Murayama, Y. (2014). Users’s action and decision making of retweet messages towards reducing misinformation spread during disaster. Journal of Information Processing, 23(1), 31-40.
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.
Berghel, H. (2017). Alt-news and post-truths in the “fake news” era. Computer, 50(4), 110-114.
Brembatti, K. (2023). Press and power in Brazil: A return to normality?. Retrieved from https://www.braziloffice.org/campaigns/view-campaign/2GZzVAidqXKW0Y3WETPu38-rhYfke-5hcx-RK-O4Mx8GBOknK2WmBTzcdeQSJQOmWfPBzNzRxgc-wn5UierGax6xU7LyHNjx.
Burkhardt, J. M. (2017). History of fake news. Library Technology Reports, 53(8), 5-9.
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. (2022). How to identify misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation. Retrieved from https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/how-identify-misinformation-disinformation-and-malinformation-itsap00300.
Cato Institute. (2022). Human freedom index. Retrieved from https://www.cato.org/human-freedom-index/2022.
Chee, F. Y. (2022). EU sets new online rules for Google, Meta to curb illegal content. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/technology/eu-countries-lawmakers-clinch-deal-new-online-content-rules-2022-04-23.
Choy, M., & Chong, M. (2018). Seeing through misinformation: A framework for identifying fake online news. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03508.
Cohen, M. (2021). Timeline of the coup: How Trump tried to weaponize the justice department to overturn the 2020 election. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/05/politics/january-6-timeline-trump-coup/index.html.
Economist Intelligence. (2022). EIU report: Democracy index 2022. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022.
European Commission. (2018). Tackling online disinformation: Commission proposes an EU-wide code of practice. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
Freedom House. (2022). Freedom on the net: research methodology. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-net/freedom-net-research-methodology.
Gathright, J. (2018). Kenya’s Crackdown on fake news raises questions about press freedom. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/05/19/612649393/kenyas-crackdown-on-fake-news-raises-questions-about-press-freedom.
Globalwebindex. (2019). Digital vs traditional media consumption. Retrieved from https://www.amic.media/media/files/file_352_2142.pdf.
Goldman, A., & Baker, D. (2019). Free speech, fake news, and democracy. FIirst Amendment Law Review, 18(1), 65-141.
Government of Canada. (2023). Canada’s digital charter. Retrieved from https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/canadas-digital-charter-trust-digital-world.
Govoni, N. A. (2004). Dictionary of marketing communications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Griffiths, J. (2019). Singapore just used its fake news law. Critics say it’s just what they feared. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/media/singapore-fake-news-facebook-intl-hnk/index.html.
Henley, J. (2020). How Finland starts its fight against fake news in primary schools. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/28/fact-from-fiction-finlands-new-lessons-in-combating-fake-news.
Hopp, T., Ferrucci, P., & Vargo, C. (2020). Why do people share ideologically extreme, false, and misleading content on social media? A self-report and trace data–based analysis of countermedia content dissemination on facebook and twitter. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 357-384.
Human Rights Watch. (2019). To speak out is dangerous: Criminalization of peaceful expression in Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/10/25/speak-out-dangerous/criminalization-peaceful-expression-thailand.
Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to online disinformation: a framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 493-516.
Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth decay: An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life. Santa Monica, California: RAND.
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The elements of journalism, revised and updated 4th edition: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York: Crownpublshing.
Lee, V. (2019). 2 Initiatives launched to help fight fake news, terrorism. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/2-initiatives-launched-to-help-fight-fake-news-terrorism.
Lupa. (2022). Who we are?. Retrieved from https://lupa.uol.com.br/institucional.
Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474-512.
McCarthy, N. (2019). Where concern is highest about fake news on the internet. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/06/12/where-concern-is-highest-about-fake-news-on-the-internet-infographic/?sh=5368297b6629.
McLuhan. M. (1962). The gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Nordic Council of Minister. (2018). Fighting fakes-the nordic way. Retrieved from http://www.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1200348/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(4), 1-19.
Ospina, J., Orosz, G., & Spencer, S. (2023). The relation between authoritarian leadership and belief in fake news. Nature, 13(1), 1-7.
Parliament of Australia. (2019). Responding to fake news. Retrieved from https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BriefingBook46p/FakeNews.
Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590-595.
Pew Research Center. (2018). Americans’ trust in the news media 2018. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Potter, J. W. (2012). Media effects. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Pourghomi, P. (2020). Academic research into combating fake news. In Y. Ibrahim & F. Safieddine (Eds.), Fake news in an era of social media: Tracking viral contagion (pp. 117-132). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Poynter Institue. (2021). A guide to anti-misinformation actions around the world. Retrieved from https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/anti-misinformation-actions.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022a). Africa: Kenya. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/kenya.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022b). Americas: Brazil. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/brazil.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022c). Americas: Canada. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/canada.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022d). Asia-Pacific: Australia. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/australia.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022e). Asia-Pacific: Singapore. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/singapore.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022f). Europe-Central Asia: Finland. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/finland.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022g). Methodology used for compiling the world press freedom index. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/index-methodologie-2022?year=2022&data_type=general.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022h). Thailand. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/country/thailand.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022i) World press freedom index 2022. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/index?year=2022.
Reuters Institute. (2019). The reuters institute digital news report 2019. London: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Reuters Institute. (2021). Digital news report 2021. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021.
Ribeiro, T. (2023). Regular report to the permanent council for the period from 4 November 2022 to 11 May 2023. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/a/a/543366_0.pdf.
Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410-424.
Richter, A. (2018). Fake news and freedom of the media. Journal of International Media and Entertainment Law, 8(2), 1-34.
Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., & Liu, Y. (2017). CSI: A hybrid deep model for fake news detection. Proceeding of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, (November), 797-806.
Safieddine, F., Masri, W., & Pourghomi, P. (2016). Corporate responsibility in combating online misinformation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(2), 126-132.
Santos, B. (2023). Brazil’s fake news bill sets global precedent with dangerouse implications. Retrieved from https://brazilian.report/opinion/2023/04/24/fake-news-bill-dangerous-implications.
Singapore Legal Advice. (2024). Singapore Fake News Laws: Guide to POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act). Retrieved from https://singaporelegaladvice.com/law-articles/singapore-fake-news-protection-online-falsehoods-manipulation/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR120A5z0qoqU_DtHU4GSRBpbw2mk76czMuN8k-ClNrTQ6trlH5W2m6LzP0_aem_NR6Px_bvWN__0ud7uzZ29w.
Stanford University. (2022). The lgacy of January 6. Retrieved from https://fsi.stanford.edu/news/legacies-january-6.
Tanikawa, M. (2017). What is news? What is the newspaper? The physical, functional, and stylistic transformation of print newspapers, 1988-2013. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 3519-3540.
Vosoughi, S., Roy D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
Wardle, C. (2017). Fake news: It’s complicated. Retrieved from https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
West, D. M. (2017). How to combat fake news and disinformation. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-to-combat-fake-news-and-disinformation.
World Health Organization. (2022). Collaboration is key to countering online misinformation about noncommunicable diseases. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/20-10-2022-collaboration-is-key-to-countering-online-misinformation-about-noncommunicable-diseases--new-who-europe-toolkit-shows-how.
Zelizer, B. (2005). Definitions of journalism. In G. Overholser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Institutions of American democracy: The press (pp. 66-80). New York: Oxford University Press.