A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SYSTEM OF CONTROLLING THE PROVISIONS OF ANY LAWS FOR NOT TO BE CONTRADICTARY TO THE CONSTITUTION OF FRANCE REPUBLIC AND THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND

Abstract

Objectives of this article were: 1. To study the concept of constitutional law; 2. To study constitutional provisions and structural law; Powers, Duties and Considerations of the Constitutional Tribunal of the French Republic and the Kingdom of Thailand, conducted by documentary research Using a documentary research model, the data were analyzed by describing the summary content according to the research objectives.

The results showed that: 1. The concept of the constitutionality of the law is the principle of the supreme law of the Constitution (Vorrang der Verfassung). There is a specific form of organization that safeguards the supreme law of the Constitution by allowing the “Court of Justice” to examine the constitutionality of a statute enacted by Congress. 2. Structure of the Constitutional Tribunal of the French Republic Provided in the 1958 Constitution, the powers and duties of the Constitutional Tribunal of the French Republic,There is a system of checking the constitutionality of the laws of the republic. The system of checking the constitutionality of the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand: The Constitutional Court under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 still has the powers and duties to examine the constitutionality of the law both before its promulgation and after its promulgation, as is the 2007 Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. 3. Recommendations There should be principles of open trial. Principles of objection to judges, Principles of litigation that are involved in the case oral prosecution process investigating evidence. There should be a way to consider that specific matter to be consistent with the issue in question