A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STRUCTURES, POWERS, AND DUTIES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GARMANY AND THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND
Keywords:
Structure and Authority, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, The Constitutional Court of the Kingdom of ThailandAbstract
Objectives of this research article were: 1. To study the concept of constitutionality of the law, 2. To study the structure, the origins of the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Constitutional Court of the Kingdom of Thailand. 3. To study and comparative analysis of the origins of the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Constitutional Court of the Kingdom of Thailand, conducted by the qualitative research, collected data from documents and related research. Data were analyzed by describing the summary content according to the research objectives.
The results showed that: 1. Legislative bodies must respect the principle of constitutional conformity with the constitution of the law. The parliament that is the representative of people who owned the sovereign power would not violate the law and the constitution that parliament enacted a law which was the action of the legislative branch was an expression of the collective will of the people's representatives. 2. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany to be eligible to be a judge, must graduated in law and the person must be 40 years old and must be a jurisprudence clearly trained. For the Kingdom of Thailand Judges of the Constitutional Court were not limited to just having to graduate in legal education because the constitution has stipulated that qualified person in political science, public administration who has true expertise in the administration of state affairs. 3. Jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Thailand differed according to the political situation of each country, but the main function was to protect the rights and liberties of the people. Federal Constitutional Court of Germany has process to control the constitutionality of the law before and after the promulgation, just like that of the Kingdom of Thailand
References
โกเมศ ขวัญเมือง. (2555). กฎหมายรัฐธรรมนูญและสถาบันการเมืองเปรียบเทียบ. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์ภูทับเบิก.
ชัยวัฒน์ วงศ์วัฒนศานต์. (2535). “คณะตุลาการรัฐธรรมนูญ: บทวิเคราะห์” ในรวมบทความทางวิชาการเนื่องในโอกาสครบรอบ 80 ปี ศาสตราจารย์ไพโรจน์ ชัยนาม. กรุงเทพฯ: คณะนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
นวม สงวนทรัพย์. (2542). สาเหตุความเสื่อมของพระพุทธศาสนาในอินเดีย. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์มหามกุฎราชวิทยาลัย.
บวรศักดิ์ อุวรรณโณ. (2538). กฎหมายมหาชน เล่ม 3 : ที่มาและนิติวิธี. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์นิติธรรม.
รัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย พุทธศักราช 2560 มาตรา 5. (2560, 6 เมษายน). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. 134 ตอนที่ 40 ก. หน้า 4.
Koopman, T. (2003). Courts and Political Institution, A Compartive Views. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovation Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In order to conform the copyright law, all article authors must sign the consignment agreement to transfer the copyright to the Journal including the finally revised original articles. Besides, the article authors must declare that the articles will be printed in only the Journal of interdisciplinary Innovation Review. If there are pictures, tables or contents that were printed before, the article authors must receive permission from the authors in writing and show the evidence to the editor before the article is printed. If it does not conform to the set criteria, the editor will remove the article from the Journal without any exceptions.


