APPROPRIATE LEGAL MEASURES TO ARREST A PERSON BY STATE POWER IN THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND

Abstract

Objectives of this research article were: 1. To study the court's criteria for issuing arrest warrants and the scope of the process of issuing arrest warrants under the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand and foreign laws; 2. To analyze the role and duty of the court as an auditing organization to check and balance the issuance of arrest warrants for the benefit of the public with maximum efficiency. 3. To suggest possible ways to resolve and improve the law, conducted by the the qualitative research method, collected information and data from relevant documents and analyzed data by synthesizing, compiling, presenting descriptive works in accordance with the objectives

          The results of the research revealed that: 1. principles of criminal proceedings by victims is a matter of the person who has been damaged or someone close to the victim to carry out the prosecution themselves. It is in the form of private revenge or war between the clans involved. The state acts as an intermediary to determine the right and wrong, including forcing offenders to be held liable according to the claims of the victims. 2. An analysis of the role of officials in discretion in protecting people's rights and liberties and the duties of the court was found that the reason for issuing arrest warrants or detention warrants was the main cause and the secondary cause. Reasons for issuing arrest warrants or detention warrants are both "primary causes" and "secondary causes". 3. The prosecutor plays a role in the case file only when the investigating officer has already presented the case to the prosecutor. which is too late to protect the interests of the parties in the case Especially the accused who cannot be fully justice. This is because important evidence in the case may be distorted or damaged due to the investigation by the investigator without an inspection system.