AN OFFENSE UNDER THE CRIMINAL LAW PROVIDED BY LAW WITHOUT INTENT

Authors

  • Phrakhru Sujitrattanakorn (Sangwan Wadthacitto) Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
  • Komes Kuanmuang Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
  • Prasert Limprasert Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University

Keywords:

Mistake, Criminal Law, Intent

Abstract

The objectives of this research article were as follows: 1. To study the concepts and theories about criminal liability that do not require intent in criminal law. 2. To study and analyse problems related to intent in criminal offences that do not require intent in various acts. That is criminally punishable, and 4. To study and recommend guidelines that are appropriate measures regarding unintended criminal acts as suggestions for amending the provisions of the Act that are criminally punishable to more clarity, conducted by documentary research by studying legal texts. Supreme Court judgments, textbooks, academic articles, theses, and electronic databases in both Thai and foreign languages. I collected ideas and suggestions from lawyers and analysed and compared them with the principles that appear in countries that use a legal code system, including the Kingdom of Thailand.

The research results found that an offence under criminal law is currently unintentionally established by law. It arises from the need to apply criminal law measures to the problem of actions that cause damage to the public. Initially, it was based on civil tort liability regarding taking precautions to prevent results as provided by law. Later, this principle was extended to other offences. This has occurred for technical reasons to maintain peace in society. In the initial stages, this principle of liability is interpreted strictly and creates strict liability for violators. This creates a debate about the concept of liability. Later, this principle of liability was relaxed, and the various struggles in excusing this liability were accepted. Several changes have been made to the provisions that define this liability more equitably.

References

เกียรติขจร วัจนะสวัสดิ์. (2551). คำอธิบายกฎหมายอาญา ภาค 1 บทบัญญัติทั่วไป (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10 แก้ไขเพิ่มเติม). กรุงเทพฯ: พลสยาม พริ้นติ้ง ประเทศไทย.

โกเมศ ขวัญเมือง. (2550). กฎหมายอาญาชั้นสูง. กรุงเทพฯ: บริษัท สำนักพิมพ์วิญญูชน จำกัด.

จิตติ ติงศภัทิย์. (2521). คำอธิบายประมวลกฎหมายอาญา ภาคที่ 1 ตอน 1 (ฉบับแก้ไขเพิ่มเติม ครั้งที่ 6). พระนคร: สำนักอบรมกฎหมายเนติบัณฑิตยสภา.

Adenaes, J. (1921). The future of criminal law. 3. Criminal Law review. 21(1), 1-16

General, H. (1966). Principles of Criminal Law (2nd ed). Indiana: The Bobb-Merill Company Inc.

Hall, J. (1960). General Principles of Criminal Law (2nd ed). Indiana: The Bobb-Merill Company Inc.

Howard, C. (1963). Strict responsibility. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Williamm, G. (1961). Criminal Law the General Fart (2nd ed). London: Steven and son.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

(Sangwan Wadthacitto), P. S., Kuanmuang, K. ., & Limprasert, P. . (2024). AN OFFENSE UNDER THE CRIMINAL LAW PROVIDED BY LAW WITHOUT INTENT. Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovation Review, 7(4), 199–211. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jidir/article/view/268365