A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUMAN CONDITIONS IN THAI AND FOREIGN CRIMINAL LAWS

Authors

  • Phrakru Chinnawirabundit (Ek Chinwamso) Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
  • Phrakru Phawanachotikhun (Kuihai Chutintharo) Wat Tham Singto Thong, Ratchaburi Province

Keywords:

Condition, Humanity, Criminal Law

Abstract

This article aims to compare the concepts and criteria for determining the beginning of human status under criminal law in Thailand and other countries. It analyzes the criteria used to establish the starting point of human status and the protection of life within various legal and cultural contexts. In Thailand, human status begins when a baby is completely born and survives, without considering physical factors such as breathing, circulatory function, or the cutting of the umbilical cord. This approach emphasizes the consideration of physical facts and the rights of individuals capable of independent living. The United Kingdom adopts criteria that focus on whether the baby can live independently after birth, including the functioning of the circulatory system or breathing. Similarly, the Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand evaluate the baby's ability to live independently without reliance on the mother’s body. Canada, on the other hand, emphasizes medical evidence such as oxygen exchange in the lungs or other indications of life, regardless of whether the baby breathes, or the umbilical cord is cut. In the United States, criteria vary across states. Some states adhere to the “born alive” principle, which assesses whether the baby has independent circulatory or respiratory function. Meanwhile, New York recognizes the rights of fetuses aged 24 weeks or older. The study highlights the diversity in defining human status, influenced by cultural factors, legal systems, and advancements in medical science.

References

ปิยะวัฒน์ บุญ-หลง. (2560). การพิจารณาสภาพบุคคลตามกฎหมายไทย: การคลอดและการอยู่รอดเป็นทารก. จุลนิติ, 8(1), 55-65.

ศักดา ธนิตกุล. (2563). ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์ ฉบับอธิบายพร้อมคำพิพากษาศาลฎีกา. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์นิติธรรม.

สมบัติ ธำรงธัญวงศ์. (2555). กฎหมายแพ่งทั่วไป. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์วิญญูชน.

เสถียร เหล่าแสงทอง. (2561). สิทธิในชีวิตและสถานะบุคคลตามกฎหมายไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.

อุดม รัฐอมฤต. (2560). นิติปรัชญาและสังคม. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.

Alexy, R. (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dixon, A.J. (2021). The evolution of fetal homicide laws in the United States. American Criminal Law Review. 58(1), 75-90.

Elliott, C. & Quinn, F. (2022). Criminal Law (14th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Finnis, J. (1995). Philosophy of Law: The Moral Foundation of Legal Personhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fletcher, G.P. (2019). Rethinking Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.

Glanville, W. (1983). Legal definitions of life and fetal rights: California jurisprudence. Current Legal Problems. 36(1), 105-115.

Gray, A. (2017). The concept of personhood in Australian criminal law. Australian Journal of Law and Philosophy, 43(1), 85-95.

Graycar, R. & Morgan, J. (2012). The Hidden Gender of Law (2nd ed.). Sydney: Federation Press.

Harman, E. (2009). Creation ethics: The moral and legal status of early fetuses. Philosophical Perspectives, 23(1), 45-50.

Harris, J. (1999). The legal definition of life in New Zealand criminal law. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 9(4), 340-350.

Harvard Law Review. (2022). Legal personhood and vital statistics: Delaware case studies. Harvard Law Review. 135(1), 110-120.

Herring, J. (2020). Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (9th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hogg, P.W. (2020). Constitutional Law of Canada (5th ed.). Toronto: Thomson Reuters.

Lafave, W.R. (2017). Substantive Criminal Law (3rd ed.). St. Paul: West Academic.

Mackenzie, C. & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ormerod, D. & Laird, K. (2018). Smith and Hogan's Essentials of Criminal Law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, R.J. (2018). Criminal Law in the United States (4th ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-22

How to Cite

(Ek Chinwamso), P. C., & (Kuihai Chutintharo), P. P. (2025). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUMAN CONDITIONS IN THAI AND FOREIGN CRIMINAL LAWS. Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovation Review, 8(1), 234–247. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jidir/article/view/276333