AI ในกระบวนการทางปกครอง: การปรับปรุงประสิทธิภาพภายใต้กรอบความโปร่งใสและการตรวจสอบได้

Kasem Comsatyadham

Authors

Kasem Comsatyadham Independent Scholar

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Administrative Processes, Transparency, Accountability, Digital Government

Abstract

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in administrative processes has become a significant trend in the 21st century. AI has the potential to enhance public service efficiency, reduce operational time and costs, and support more accurate decision-making. However, the implementation of AI in the public sector raises important issues concerning transparency, accountability, and fairness. This article analyzes the role of AI in administrative processes, examining the benefits and challenges involved, as well as the necessary frameworks to ensure that AI deployment operates within principles of transparency and accountability. The study includes comparative analysis of international practices and proposes recommendations for Thailand’s context.

References

พระราชบัญญัติวิธีปฏิบัติราชการทางปกครอง พ.ศ. 2539. (2539, 14 พฤศจิกายน). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. เล่ม 113 ตอนที่ 60 ก. หน้า 1–14.

สำนักงานพัฒนารัฐบาลดิจิทัล (องค์การมหาชน) (สพร.). (2565). แผนพัฒนารัฐบาลดิจิทัลของประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2566–2570. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานพัฒนารัฐบาลดิจิทัล (องค์การมหาชน) (สพร.).

Angwin, J. et al. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against Blacks. Retrieved December 6, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/28ApS

Bovens, M. & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

Bullock, J. B. (2019). Artificial intelligence, discretion, and bureaucracy. American Review of Public Administration, 49(7), 751–761.

Chouldechova, A. & Roth, A. (2020). A snapshot of the frontiers of fairness in machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 63(5), 82–89.

Coglianese, C. & Lehr, D. (2019). Transparency and algorithmic governance. Administrative Law Review, 71(1), 1–56.

European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Brussels: European Commission.

Galligan, D. J. (1996). Due process and fair procedures: A study of administrative procedures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hood, C. & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitsing, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the public sector: The case of Estonia. Paris: OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI). Retrieved December 6, 2025, from https://oecd-opsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/AI-in-Estonia.pdf

Mitchell, M. et al. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*). Retrieved December 6, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/8x5rt

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown.

Office of Management and Budget. (2020). Guidance for regulation of artificial intelligence applications (Memorandum M-21-06). Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.

Personal Data Protection Commission Singapore (PDPC). (2020). Model artificial intelligence governance framework (2nd ed.). Singapore: Personal Data Protection Commission Singapore (PDPC).

Russell, S. & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

Selbst, A. D. (2018). The intuitive appeal of explainable machines. Fordham Law Review, 87, 1085–1139.

Wirtz, B. W. et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector: Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.