Holistic Quality of Life Development Based on Theravada Buddhist Philosophy

Main Article Content

Wiset Sangkanjanavanich

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) investigate the concept of holistic quality of life development; (2) examine Theravada Buddhist philosophical principles related to holistic quality of life; and (3) analyze holistic quality of life development based on Theravada Buddhist philosophy. A hermeneutic qualitative methodology was utilized via documentary analysis of the Tipitaka, commentaries, and pertinent contemporary academic literature. The results revealed that the notion of quality of life had shifted from a narrow focus on physical and economic indicators toward a holistic perspective integrating physical, mental, social, and spiritual dimensions. These dimensions were consistent with the fourfold Buddhist cultivation (Bhavana 4): physical, moral, mental, and wisdom cultivation. Importantly, this research did not merely reaffirm existing Buddhist teachings but synthesized Pavana 4 with internationally recognized frameworks, particularly the WHOQOL and Human Flourishing models. This integration resulted in the “Pavana 4 Holistic Framework,” a new conceptual model that emphasizes mutual support among the four dimensions and provides practical applicability. The framework could be implemented at individual, familial, organizational, and societal levels, thereby contributing to sustainable well-being from the inside out. The hermeneutic interpretation had limitations in that it depended on the researcher’s context and experiences; therefore, the application of the developed framework should have been considered cautiously in other contexts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sangkanjanavanich, W. (2026). Holistic Quality of Life Development Based on Theravada Buddhist Philosophy. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 313–328. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/282332
Section
Research Articles

References

พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2551). พจนานุกรมพุทธศาสน์ ฉบับประมวลศัพท์. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 11). กรุงเทพฯ: เอสอาร์พริ้นติ้งแมสโปรดักส์.

มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกฉบับภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

Boxer, A., Shawyer, F., CoghlanIan, I., Ling, D., & Meadows, G. (2025). Mindfulness-based interventions: What more can the West learn from Buddhism? A fieldwork study. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(1), Article 1579575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579575

Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-Being for Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harvey, P. (2000). An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jiwattanasuk, N., Pannavoravat, P., & Sirikanchana, P. (2022). The holistic well-being concepts in relation to quality of life. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 10(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.16

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016

Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197

King, D. B., & DeCicco, T. L. (2008). A viable model and self-report measure of spiritual intelligence. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 28(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2009.28.1.68

Maung, J. J., DeMaranville, J., Wongpakaran, T., Peisah, C., Arunrasameesopa, S., & Wongpakaran, N. (2025). The role of equanimity in predicting the mental well-being of the residents in long-term care facilities in Thailand. Nursing Reports, 15(4), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040123

Meeprasertsagool, N., Anuraktham, P., Chaithanasarn, A., & Wongprom, I. (2025). Future directions of spiritual care where spiritual care providers do not exist: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 24, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01658-w

OECD. (2023). OECD economic outlook, volume 2023 issue 1. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the Sacred. New York: Guilford.

Phong, C. T. (2024). Awakening from within: An exploration of self-healing through Buddhist approach. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 27(3), 329–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2024.2361666

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness, well-being and how to achieve them. Massachusetts: Nicholas Brealey.

Tang, S., & Wong, P. T. P. (2025). Flourishing beyond religion: Toward a universal model of spiritual well-being. International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15(1), 1–20.

United Nations Development Programme. (2025, April 7). UNDP annual report 2024. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/publications/undp-annual-report-2024

VanderWeele, T. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. PNAS, 114(31), 8148–8156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114

Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 690–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.690

WHOQOL Group. (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the world health organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K

World Health Organization. (1997). Measuring quality of life: The WHOQOL-100. Geneva: WHO.