Opportunities, Feasibility and the Impact of Generative AI on Students in the Digital Technology for Business Program
Main Article Content
Abstract
The application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) in teaching and learning has brought about transformative changes. This research has three main objectives: (1) to analyze students' opinions on the opportunities increased by using Generative AI; (2) to explore students' perspectives on the feasibility of integrating Generative AI to develop their skills in four essential areas of the curriculum—education, software development, art, and business; and (3) to assess the impact of Generative AI on students' learning, attitudes, and skill development related to digital business. The sample group consisted of 48 fourth-year students from the Digital Technology for Business program at Silpakorn University. The instructor selected case studies that applied Generative AI in four areas aligned with the program’s learning outcomes: education, software development, design and art, and business. The research was conducted over two months, starting with instruction on the use of Generative AI tools in each area, followed by practical exercises. The students' assignments in each domain were collected, and surveys were conducted to analyze and evaluate the results. The findings showed that all 48 students were able to apply Generative AI effectively. Within one month, the use of Generative AI tools in different domains increased significantly, with 60.42% of students using Chabot. The frequency of usage increased from "never used" to 20 times per month for 18.75% of students. The highest frequency was 1–5 times per month, accounting for 41.67%. Students primarily used Generative AI for homework or assigned tasks, followed by coding and language translation in nearly equal proportions, with video editing being the least common use. Students rated the overall opportunities, feasibility, and impacts of Generative AI across all four areas as high. This indicates that students are prepared to learn and engage with Generative AI while recognizing its opportunities, feasibility, and impacts. Instructors can leverage the benefits of Generative AI by encouraging students to use this technology for research and assignments, while providing opportunities for students to share their experiences on how Generative AI improved their learning efficiency. This approach helps prepare students to adapt to modern technologies in the future.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Authors must agree to the journal publication rules and allow the editors to edit the manuscripts for publication.
-
Author’s right belongs to the author but Journal of Southern Technology holds the right of first publication and thus allow readers to use the article for the purpose of education but not commercial.
References
Alier, M., García-Peñalvo, F., & Camba, J. D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education: From deceptive to disruptive. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011
Alberts, I., Mercolli, L., Pyka, T., Prenosil, G., Shi, K., Rominger, A., & Afshar-Oromieh, A. (2023). Large language models (LLM) and ChatGPT: What will the impact on nuclear medicine be: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 50, 1549–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06172-w.
Burucu, R., & Arslan, S. (2021). Nursing students’ views and suggestions about case-based learning integrated into the nursing process: A qualitative study. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 29(3), 371–378.https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2021.20180.
Bandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R., & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. (2023). The power of generative AI: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats, evaluation metrics, and challenges. Future Internet, 15(8), 260, https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080260.
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology. (2024, August 31). Bachelor of Science (Digital Technology for Business). http://www.ict.su.ac.th
Jirathikrengkrai, C., & Kesornsuwan, J. (2024). The effects of case-based learning on critical thinking skills among nursing students. Journal of Education and Innovative Learning, 4(1), 51–64. [in Thai]
Kanhadilok, S., Malai, C., & Punsumreang, T. (2019). A design of case based learning for promoting learning outcomes in practicum. Songklanagarind Journal of Nursing, 39(4), 129-137. [in Thai]
McLean, S. F. (2016). Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: A review of worldwide literature. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 3, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120516655840.
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856.
Mingsiritham, K. (2023). ChatGPT and education in the digital age. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 1-10.
Mittal, U., Sai, S., Chamola, V., & Sangwan, D. (2024). A Comprehensive Review on Generative AI for Education. IEEE Access, 12, 142733–142759. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3468368.
Mondal, S., Das, S., & Vrana, V. G. (2023). How to bell the cat? A theoretical review of generative artificial intelligence towards digital disruption in all walks of life. Technologies, 11(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020044.
National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA). (n.d.). อนาคตการใช้ Generative AI ในภาคองค์กร [The future of Generative AI in organizations]. Retrieved November 24, 2024, from https://www.nstda.or.th/sci2pub/generative-ai
Prather, J., Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Becker, B. A., Albluwi, I., Craig, M., … Savelka, J. (2023). The robots are here: Navigating the generative AI revolution in computing education. In Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR '23) (pp. 108–159). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3623762.3633499.
Shaikh, S., Bendre, R., & Mhaske, S. (2023). The Rise of Creative Machines: Exploring the Impact of Generative AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13262. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13262
Shohani, M., Bastami, M., Gheshlaghi, L. A., & Nasrollahi, A. (2023). Nursing student's satisfaction with two methods of CBL and lecture-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 48. https://doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04028-3.
Srikulwong, M. (2023, October 10). Generative AI & ChatGPT: Business use cases, opportunities and struggles [Seminar presentation]. Digital Technology for Business Seminar, Silpakorn University, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Wadhwani, S. (2024). Top three LLMs compared GPT-4 Turbo vs. Claude 3 Opus vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro. Retrieved from https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/articles/top-three-large-language-models-compared.
Wang, T., Díaz, D. V., Brown, C., & Chen, Y. (2023). Exploring the role of AI Assistants in Computer Science Education: Methods, Implications, and Instructor Perspectives. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 92-102). https://doi.org/10.1109/VL-HCC57772.2023.00018.
Waralak, V. S. (2024). Elevating user-centered design with AI: A comprehensive exploration using the AI-UCD algorithm framework. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Context-Aware Systems and Applications, 10(1), e1. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-4-2024.178774.