Welfare of the rubber crop diversity farmers under risks of price in Thailand

Authors

  • Sirimaporn Leepromrath Business English, School of Foreign Languages, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou 510850, China
  • De Zhou Agricultural Economics and Management, College of Economics and Management, China Center for Food Security Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Keywords:

crop diversity, price risk, rubber farmer, Thailand, welfare

Abstract

The creative industry’s influence on the tourism sector in South Sulawesi is investigated in this study, with a particular emphasis on the factors that contribute to the sector’s success. The research uses a quantitative technique to examine the effects of innovation, product quality, and competitive advantage on the performance of enterprises in the creative economy. Using the Partial Least Square (PLS) Structural Equation Model (SEM), an analysis was performed on a sample of 213 creative industry participants in tourist regions that were recognized as such. The data indicate a strong association between innovation, product quality, and sustainable competitive advantage. All of these factors considerably improve business performance in the creative sector. According to the study’s findings, maintaining a competitive advantage is essential for the economic viability of creative firms operating within the tourism sector in South Sulawesi over the long term. The stakeholders are provided with a strategic framework by these insights, which assists them in navigating the ever-changing problems and opportunities in this dynamic market.

References

Baltodano, J. (2000). Monoculture forestry: A critique from an ecological perspective. Tree trouble: A compilation of testimonies on the negative impact of large-scale monoculture tree plantations prepared for the 6th COP of the FCCC. Friends of the Earth International, (pp. 2–10).

Bangkokbiznews. (2022). ส่งออกสินค้าเกษตรปี 64 พุ่ง 1.3 ล้านล้าน คาด 65 เติบโตต่อเนื่อง [Exports of agricultural products in 2021 will increase 1.3 trillion baht, expected to grow continuously]. Bangkokbiznews. www.bangkokbiznews.com/business/989007 [in Thai]

Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A., & Wilson, J. D. (2003). Farmland biodiversity: Is habitat heterogeneity the key?. Trends in ecology &

evolution, 18(4), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9

Charernjiratragul, S., Romyen, A., & Satsue, P. (2017). Development of rubber-based intercropping system in Southern Thailand: Problems and obstacles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 588–599. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452315117306495

Charernjiratragul, S., Satsu, P., & Romyen, A. (2015). ความรู้ภาคปฏิบัติและบทเรียนกับการขับเคลื่อนเชิงนโยบายเพื่อเพิ่มพื้นที่การปลูกพืชร่วมยาง [Practical knowledge and lessons learned from driving the policy on expanding the area for the rubber-based intercropping systems]. Journal of Social Development, 17(2), 35–50. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsd/article/view/41272 [in Thai]

Costedoat, S., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Baylis, K., & Castillo-Santiago, M. A. (2015). How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?. PloS one, 10(3), e0119881. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119881&type=printable

Di Falco, S., & Chavas, J.-P. (2009). On crop biodiversity, risk exposure, and food security in the highlands of Ethiopia. American journal of agricultural economics, 91(3), 599–611.

Department of Trade Negotiations [DTN]. (2021). การส่งออกสินค้าเกษตรของไทย กับประเทศคู่ FTA ไตรมาสแรกปี 2564 [An export of Thai agricultural products and FTA counterpart countries in the first quarter of 2021]. Department of Trade Negotiations, Nonthaburi, Thailand. https://www.dtn.go.th/th/file/get/file/1.20220404e660d7fcd1e2460d3c7c3cc81c55edb0104203.pdf [in Thai]

Erskine, P. D., Lamb, D., & Bristow, M. (2006). Tree species diversity and ecosystem function: Can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity?. Forest Ecology and Management, 233(2–3), 205–210. https://reforestation.me/wp-content/uploads/

/05/51006274.pdf

Fafchamps, M. (1992). Cash crop production, food price volatility, and rural market integration in the third world. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242993

Gouel, C., & Jean, S. (2015). Optimal food price stabilization in a small open developing country. World Bank Economic Review, 29(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht018

Hauser, I., Martin, K., Germer, J., He, P., Blagodatskiy, S., Liu, H., Kraus, M., Rajaona, A., Shi, M., & Langenberger, G. (2015). Environmental and socio-economic impacts of rubber cultivation in the Mekong region: Challenges for sustainable land use. CAB Reviews, 10(27), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201510027

Jongrungrot, V. (2014). ประสิทธิภาพทางเศรษฐกิจและความมั่นคงทางสังคมของระบบการท􀃎ำฟาร์มที่มีการปลูกพืชในสวนยางของเกษตรกรรายย่อยภาคใต้ [The economic efficiency and social security of smallholder farming system which practices associate crops in rubber plots in Southern Thailand]. [Doctoral dissertation, Prince of Songkla University]. http://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/handle/2010/9665 [in Thai]

Kheowvongsri, P., & Pechkeo, S. (2017). วนเกษตรยางพารา [Rubber agroforestry]. Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai Campus. https://ppi.psu.ac.th/paper/2432 [in Thai]

Knudsen, O., & Nash, J. (1990). Domestic price stabilization schemes in developing countries. Economic development and Cultural Change, 38(3), 539–558. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0079%28199004%2938%3A3%3C539%3ADPSSID%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A

Liu, C. L. C., Kuchma, O., & Krutovsky, K. V. (2018). Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Global ecology and conservation, 15, e00419. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198941830088X

Longpichai, O., & Kongmanee, C. (2019). การรับรู้ความไตรกรสวนยางในภาคใต้ของประเทศไทย [Rubber farmers’ risk perception in Southern Thailand]. Parichart Journal Thaksin University, 32(2), 134–146. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/parichartjournal/article/view/138003 [in Thai]

NABC. (2021). An important of agricultural production information. National Agricultural Big Data Center, Office of Agricultural Economics. http://thaisdi.gistda.or.th/hu/dataset/oae0001

OAE. (2020). Agricultural statistics of Thailand. O. o. A. Economics. OAE (2022). ราคาสินค้าเกษตรรายเดือน [Monthly agricultural price].

www.oae.go.th/view/1/ราคาสินค้าเกษตรรายเดือน/TH-TH] [in Thai]

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2011). Payment for ecosystem service: PES The 3rd South-East Asia Workshop on Payment for Ecosystem Service (PES) - Investment in Natural Capital for Green Growth Aceh, Indonesia. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_w3c/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=2699

Ottaviani, D., & Scialabba, E.-H. (2011). Payments for ecosystem services and food security. https://www.fao.org/4/i2100e/i2100e.pdf

Sadoulet, E., & Janvry, A. d. (1995). Quantitative development policy analysis. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Sarwosri, A. W., & Mußhoff, O. (2020). Are risk attitudes and time preferences crucial factors for crop diversification by smallholder farmers?. Journal of International Development, 32(6), 922–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3483

Simien, A., & Penot, E. (2011). Current evolution of smallholder rubber-based farming systems in Southern Thailand. Journal of sustainable forestry, 30(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2011.530936

Smajgl, A., Xu, J., Egan, S., Yi, Z.-F., Ward, J., & Su, Y. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services for diversifying rubber in Yunnan, China. Environmental Modelling & Software, 69, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.014

Somboonsuke, B., Kongmanee, C., Thongtrai, N., & Phitthayaphinant, P. (2018). ศักยภาพการผลิตยางพาราไทย: การจัดการเทคโนโลยีการผลิต ปัญหา

และแนวทางการเพิ่มผลผลิต [Potential of para-rubber production in Thailand: Production technology management, problems and suggestions for yield improvement]. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 645–659. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/242476

Thailand Board of Investment. (2017). Thailand’s Rubber Industry. https://www.boi.go.th/upload/content/Rubber_5a3b80bcc4882.pdf

Williams, S., Van Noordwijk, M., Penot, E., Healey, J. R., Sinclair, F. L., & Wibawa, G. (2001). On-farm evaluation of the establishment of clonal rubber in multistrata agroforests in Jambi, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 53(2), 227–237. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1013336822923

Downloads

Published

21-08-2025

How to Cite

Sirimaporn Leepromrath, & De Zhou. (2025). Welfare of the rubber crop diversity farmers under risks of price in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(3), 460318. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/284592

Issue

Section

Research articles