Investigating the intricacies of populist leadership in the digital era while unraveling the paradox of tolerance in Indonesia
Keywords:
digital era, intolerance, pluralism, populist leadership, social mediaAbstract
This study aims to explore the paradox of tolerance in Indonesia during the second term of the populist leadership of Joko Widodo. In addition, both physical and virtual interactions have become breeding grounds for intolerance during this period. Despite high expectations for increased tolerance, the freedom of speech facilitated by social media has aggravated and reinforced anti-pluralistic sentiments. Acts of intolerance, in contradiction to the constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion and belief, are perpetrated by entities both within and outside the state apparatus. The primary focus of this study is to address how the state should effectively respond to these intolerant actions in the domain of social media. The research method uses a netnography approach. Sampling was done by purposive sampling consisting of 12 YouTube channel accounts. Data collection was carried out by capturing 32,048 virtual community conversations and comment screens on 12 YouTube channels from August 24 to December 21, 2021. Thematic data analysis was conducted using the NVIVO 14 application or DAPA (Data Analysis Procedure by Application). The results showed that the state overlooked intolerant practices by Islamic apologists while directly persecuting Christian apologists exercising the fundamental right to free speech. Based on these results, the study recommends three key actions, including implementing inclusive broadcasting regulations for fair representation, establishing the digital democratic space to encourage open dialogue, and ensuring anti-discriminatory laws suited for the digital era to effectively combat intolerance.
References
Albayrak, H. Ş. (2019). Religious pluralism and religion-state relations in Turkey. Religions, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010061
Ammerman, N. T. (2010). The challenges of pluralism: Locating religion in a world of diversity. Social Compass, 57(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768610362406
Ariefana, P., & Nirmalasari, R. (2020). Nasib Gereja Yasmin dan HKBP Filadelfia Tak Jelas, PGI Temui Menkopolhukam
[Fate of Yasmin Church and HKBP Filadelfia Unclear, PGI Meets Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs]. https://www.suara.com/news/2020/02/13/110258/nasib-gereja-yasmin-dan-hkbp-filadelfia-tak-jelas-pgi-temui-menkopolhukam
Banu, A., & Ridwan, M. (2021, April 21). Jozeph: Pemerintahan Jokowi Lebih Aman, Tapi 200 Gereja Ditutup [Jozeph: Jokowi’s government is safer, but 200 churches are closed]. https://www.jawapos.com/kasuistika/01321932/jozeph-pemerintahan-jokowi-lebih-aman-tapi-200-gereja-ditutup#goog_rewarded
Bastian, L. (2015). Social media use in religious communication : The Christian migrants of Kerala, India. Religion and Social Communication, 13(1), 65–83. https://asianresearchcenter.org/arc-journal/religion-and-social-communication-13-no-1-2015
Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, Secular Europe?: A theme and variations. Ashgate. http://www.ashgate.com
Bräuchler, B. (2010). The revival dilemma: Reflections on human rights, self-determination and legal pluralism in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 42(62), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2010.10756648
Bungin, B. (2021). Post qualitative social research methods, quntitative-qualitative-mix methods (Positivism, post positivism, phenomenology, postmodern). Kencana, Prenadamedia.
Bustomi, M. I. (2021). Youtuber Muhammad Kece Juga Dilaporkan ke Polda Metro Jaya atas Dugaan Penistaan Agama [Youtuber Muhammad Kece was also reported to Polda Metro Jaya for alleged Blasphemy of religion]. Kompas.Com, 3(1), 1–2. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/08/23/20170981/youtuber-muhammad-kece-juga-dilaporkan-ke-polda-metro-jaya-atas-
dugaan.
Buwana, T. S., & Kurnia, N. (2021). Konstruksi citra politik populisme Islam ( Analisis Wacana Kritis Akun Resmi Facebook Jokowi di Tahun Poltik 2019)[Construction of the political image of Islamic populism (Critical discourse analysis of Jokowi’s Official Facebook account in the 2019 Polit)]. UGM. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/197648
Coe, P. (2015). The social media paradox: An intersection with freedom of expression and the criminal law. Information and Communications Technology Law, 24(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2015.1004242
Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216
Duc, A. Le. (2009). Cyber / digital theology: Rethinking about our relationship with god and neighbor in the digital environment. Religion and Social Communication Bibliography, 134. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3057507
Fuentes, J. F. (2020). Populism the timeline of a concept. Contributions to the History of Concepts, 15(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2020.150103
Gagnon, J.-P., Beausoleil, E., Son, K.-M., Arguelles, C., Chalaye, P., & Johnston, C. N. (2018). What is populism? Who is the populist? Democratic Theory, 5(2), 6–106. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050201
Goel, P., & Misra, R. (2020). It’s not inter-religiosity but intra-religiosity that really matters in attitude towards business ethics: Evidence from India. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2018-0153
Hasan, H. (2020). Jokowi dan tantangan kepemimpinan toleransi [Jokowi and the challenge of leadership of tolerance]. https://
setara-institute.org/jokowi-dan-tantangan-kepemimpinan-toleransi/
Leesmidt, K., & Jarunratanakul, P. (2022). Buddhist compassionate leadership and employee psychological outcomes: The mediating role of trust in leader on Thai financial services employees. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.09
Margiansyah, D. (2019). Populisme di Indonesia kontemporer: Transformasi persaingan populisme dan konsekuensinya
dalam dinamika kontestasi politik menjelang pemilu 2019 [Populism in contemporary Indonesia: The transformation of populism competition and its consequences in the dy. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i1.783
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political studies, 62(2), 381–397.
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and
future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? In T. S. Pappas (Ed.), Populism and liberal democracy: A comparative and theoretical analysis
(pp. 13–39). University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837886.003.0001
Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639
Patrick, G. (2017). Religion in the digital space, exploring its dynamics with reference to the Asian context. Religion and Social Communication, 15(1), 116–130.
Gnana, P., & Patrick, G. (2018). Virtual spaces and inter / intra-religious dialogues. Religion and Social Communication, 16(1), 69–86.
Petty, A. R. (2016). The concept of “Religion” in the supreme court of Israel. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 26(211),
–105. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2868820/view
Piriyakul, I., Piriyakul, R., & Piriyakul, M. (2022). Analysis of Thai text from social media for mass customization. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.11
Powell, R., & Clarke, S. (2013). Religion, tolerance, and intolerance: Views from Across the disciplines. Religion, Intolerance, and
Conflict, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640911.003.0001
Priyowidodo, G. (2010). Reporting on ‘Monas Incident’ in the mass media construction. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 131–143.
Priyowidodo, G. (2020). Netnografi komunikasi [Communication netnography]. Rajawali Pers.
Priyowidodo, G., Rahman, N. A. A., Luik, J. E., Indrayani, I. I., & Hadi, I. P. (2024). Political influencers on social media: Language used and content of communication strategy of Indonesian politicians’ Twitter accounts. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 99–199. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-06
Rooduijn, M. (2013). The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition, 49(4), 572–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.30
Rusmulyadi, R., & Hafiar, H. (2018). Dekonstruksi citra politik Jokowi dalam media sosial [Deconstruction of Jokowi’s political image in social media]. PRofesi Humas, 3(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v3i1.16729
Seijts, G., & Clercy, C. De. (2020). How do populist voters rate their political leaders? Comparing citizen assessments in
three jurisdictions. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2540
Sigit, K. A., & Ismail, H. (2020). Intoleransi semasa pandemi: Kondisi kebebasan beragama/berkeyakinan di Indonesia tahun 2020 [Intolerance during a pandemic: conditions of freedom of religion/belief in Indonesia in 2020]. Pustaka Masyarakat Setara. www.setara-institute.org
Sikka, S. (2021). Pluralism about what? Religion as belief and identity. Re-Thinking Religious Pluralism, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9540-0_1
Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & Van Droogenbroeck, F. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to it? Political Research
Quarterly, 69(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138
Susanto, E. H. (2017). Conflict between groups of different religion and beliefs posing as threat to heterogeneity in Indonesia. Modern Applied Science, 11(12), 22. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v11n12p22
Tapsell, R. (2015). Indonesia’s media oligarchy and the “Jokowi Phenomenon.” Indonesia, April(99), 29–50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ind.2015.0004
Tapsell, R. (2021). Divide and rule: Populist crackdowns and media elites in the Philippines. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921
UNESCO. (1994). Tolerance : The threshold of peace. UNESCO.
Wahab, A. J., Nofandi, A., & et.al. (2020). Persoalan pendirian gereja di Indonesia [The problem of church establishment in Indonesia]. Litbangdiklat Press Kemenag. https://simlitbangdiklat.kemenag.go.id/simlitbang/assets_front/pdf/1611130300Persoalan_Pendirian_Gereja_di_Indonesia.pdf
Zaenal, M., & Eko, A. (2021). Resolusi konflik ujaran kebencian di media sosial berbasis kearifan lokal di Bali [Hate Speaking Conflict Resolution in social media based on local wisdom in Bali]. Harmoni Journal, 20(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v20i2.517
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kasetsart UniversityThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
