Clan culture and solidarity ties as positive indicators of democratic development in Thai-Isan communities
Keywords:
civic culture, clan culture, democratic political culture, principal political culture, solidarityAbstract
This qualitative study aimed to analyze the principal and most prominent political culture shared among villagers in rural Northeast Thailand and how it helps facilitate and uphold democratic development. In-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and focus groups were used to collect data from four rural villages located across Nong Bua Lamphu and Udon Thani provinces in Northeast Thailand. The 65 informants included knowledgeable people in the community, leaders, and villagers, as well as individuals from outside the communities, including academics, intellectuals, and politicians. The findings showed that the principal political culture shared among villagers is strongly linked to their longstanding adherence to clan culture and their strong solidarity ties. These features of traditional society in Northeast Thailand help to maintain democratic development at the local and community level by fostering harmonious love and unity among the villagers, which manifests as a collective social commitment, or what is called a “social trust.” This social trust is what motivates villagers’ voluntary political participation. It fosters among villagers a belief in their own political efficacy, a consciousness and understanding of individual and community rights, and a feeling of civic responsibility. These are all important attributes of a civic culture and serve as the central foundation for democratic development at the local and community level.
References
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Little, Brown & Company.
Almond, G. A. & Powell, C.B. (1966). Comparative politics: A developmental approach. Little, Brown & Company.
Boossabong, P. (2007). การเข้าถึงวิถีประชาธิปไตยแบบชาวบ้าน : ก้าวแรกสู่การพัฒนาการเมืองภาคประชาชน [The culture of the villagers’ way of life is the first step toward the political development of the people]. King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal, 6(2), 1–36. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kpi_journal/article/view/244662 [in Thai]
Chaithieng, T. (2017). ป่าแห่งจิตวิญญาณ: มรดกทางนิเวศและวัฒนธรรมของกลุ่มชนพื้นเมืองบนแผ่นดินอีสานตอนบน [Spiritual forest: Ecological and cultural heritage of indigenous peoples on land Upper Isan]. In Natsupha, C. & Uitrakul, P. (Eds.), วัฒนธรรมและเศรษฐกิจชุมชนอีสานเหนือ [North Isan community culture and economy]. Creativity. [in Thai]
Chalermsan, U. (2020). การต่อรองอัตลักษณ์อีสาน ของวัยรุ่นอีสานในยุคดิจิทัล [Negotiating Isan identity among Isan youth in the digital age]. Journal of Development studies Thammasat University, 3(1), 1–39. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gvc-tu/article/view/246031
[in Thai]
Chilton, S. (1991). Grounding political development. Lynne Rienner.
Dalton, R. J. & Shin, C. D. (2011). Reassessing the civic culture model. In Mapping and tracking global value change, Center for the Study of Democracy. University of California.
Eckstein, H. (1992). Regarding politics: Essays on political theory, stability, and change. University of California Press.
Faulks, K. (2000). Political sociology: A critical Introduction. New York University Press.
Fuengfusakul, A. (2003). อัตลักษณ์: การทบทวนทฤษฎีและกรอบแนวคิด [Identity: theory and concept frameworks review]. National Research Council of Thailand. [in Thai]
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144
Graneheim, B. L. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Bacon Press.
Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (1980). Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–1979. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203381182
Inglehart, F. R. & Wayne, E. B. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500103
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
Janmaat, G. (2006). Civic culture in Western and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Sociology, 47, 363–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975606000129
Kertpolsert & Yamnill. (2021). Promoting active citizenship in the community: A case study of Nong Sarai, Phanomthuan District, Kanchanaburi, Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.2.22
Kongkirati, P. (2012). การเมืองว่าด้วยการเลือกตั้ง: วาทกรรม อำนาจ และพลวัตชนบทไทย [Election politics: Discourse, power, and the dynamics of the Thai countryside]. Same Sky Books. [in Thai]
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
Mattes. R. & Bratton. M. (2007). Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00245.x
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nakata, T. (2012). การเมืองไทย: ระบบที่ไม่มีสูตรสำเร็จรูปในการแก้ไขปัญหา [Thai politics: A system that does not have a tutorial to fix the problem]. Panyachon. [in Thai]
Nash, K. (2010). Contemporary political sociology: Globalization, politics, and power. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Natsupa, C. & Ouitrakul, P. (2017). North Isan community culture and economy. Creativity.
Natthaphatthanunth, E. (2015). การเมืองเสื้อสีกับการศึกษาขบวนการโต้กลับตามจารีตการศึกษาขบวนการทางสังคมและการเมือง [The colored-shirt politics and the study of counter- movement in the tradition of
social and political movement study]. Social Science Journal, 27(1), 85–127. [in Thai]
Pothisita, C. (2019). ศาสตร์และศิลป์การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ: คู่มือนักศึกษาและนักวิจัยสังคมศาสตร์ [The science and art of qualitative research: A guide for students and social science researchers]. Amarin Printing and Publishing. [in Thai]
Phongphit, S. (2020, September, 2). อนาคตท้องถิ่น‑อนาคตไทย [Local future–Thailand’s future]. Siamrath Online. https://siamrath.co.th/c/179191 [in Thai]
Promgird, P. (2013). สังคมวิทยาการเมือง [Political sociology] (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen University Printing. [in Thai]
Promgird, P. (2014). วัฒนธรรมทางการเมืองของประชาชนกับการพัฒนาประชาธิปไตย [Political culture and the development of democracy]. Royal Thai Naval Academy Academic Journals, 1(1), 84–91. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rtna-socialj/issue/view/16637/3939 [in Thai]
Promgird, P. (2016). ก้าวข้ามกับดักการพัฒนาประชาธิปไตยไทยด้วยการพัฒนาวัฒนธรรมทางการเมืองแบบประชาธิปไตย: สู่เส้นทางใหม่ที่ยั่งยืนกว่า [Going beyond Thai democratic development trap through democratic political culture development: Towards more Sustainable New Path]. Romphruek Journal, 34(2), 70–99. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HUSO/article/view/51721 [in Thai]
Puckadhikom, C. (1977). ประวัติศาสตร์ไทย สมัยแรกเริ่มจนถึงสมัยธนบุรี การศึกษาเฉพาะประเด็น [Thai history from the early period to the Thonburi period: A thematic study]. Ramkhamhaeng University. [in Thai]
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rose, R. & Shin, D. C. (2001). Democratization backwards: The problem of third–wave democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 31(2), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000138
Pye, L. W. (1972). Culture and Political science: Political science: Problems in the evaluation of the concept of political culture. Social Science Quarterly, 53(2), 285–296. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42858958
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). The role of heuristics in political reasoning: A theory sketch. In Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology (pp. 14–30). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720468
Srisontisuk, S. (2014). โสวัฒนธรรมอีสานในงานวิจัย [So-Isan culture in research]. Chaing Mai University. [in Thai]
Taylor, C. (1992). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton University Press.
Taylor, C. (2012). The space of exchange. In M. J. B. Macmillan (Ed.), Radical responsibility (pp. 45–60). Rowman & Littlefield.
Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. University of Chicago Press.
Tönnies, F. (1957). Community & society [Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft]. Transaction Publishers. [in German]
Wasi, P. (2007). ประชาธิปไตยชุมชน: รากฐานของการเมืองสมานฉันท์และการเมืองคุณธรรม [Local democracy: foundations of solidarity and moral politics]. National Health Foundation. [in Thai]
Whiteley, P. F. (1995). Rational choice and political participation–evaluating the debate. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800112
Wongtrangan, K. (1989). วัฒนธรรมทางการเมืองในระบอบประชาธิปไตย [Political culture in a democratic]. In เอกสารการสอนชุดวิชาวิวัฒนาการการเมืองไทย [Evolution of Thai politics]. School of Liberal Arts, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kasetsart UniversityThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
