The role of flexible work arrangements and supervisor support on task performance in the manufacturing sector in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC)

Authors

  • Panitada Limrueangrong Doctoral program of Industrial Administration and Development, Faculty of Management Sciences, Kasetsart University, Chonburi 20230, Thailand
  • Jutamard Thaweepaiboonwong Academy of Management Sciences, Faculty of Management Sciences, Kasetsart University, Chonburi 20230, Thailand

Keywords:

flexible work arrangements, supervisor support, task performance, well-being, work engagement

Abstract

This quantitative study aims to examine the influence of flexible work arrangements and supervisor support on employee well-being, work engagement, and task performance. Furthermore, it explores the moderating role of digital literacy in the relationship between flexible work arrangements and task performance. Data were collected through questionnaires from a sample of 452 employees who engaged in flexible work arrangements in large manufacturing establishments located in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) of Thailand. Statistics used in data analysis include percentage, mean, standard deviation, and structural equation modeling analysis using AMOS. The research findings indicated that the model was consistent with the empirical data (CMIN/DF = 2.034, CFI = 0.965, GFI = 0.929, RMR = 0.029, RMSEA = 0.034). The model suggested that flexible work arrangements positively influenced task performance, well-being, and work engagement. Additionally, employees with both flexible work arrangements and a high level of digital literacy demonstrated elevated task performance.

References

Ab Wahab, M., & Tatoglu, E. (2020). Chasing productivity demands, worker well-being, and firm performance: The moderating

effects of HR support and flexible work arrangements. Personnel Review, 49(9), 1823–1843. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2019-0026

Abas, M. K., Yahaya, R. A., & Din, M. S. F. (2019). Digital literacy and its relationship with employee performance in the 4IR. Journal of

International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.24191/jibe.v4i2.14312

Ahmad, Z., Asmawi, A., & Samsi, S. Z. M. (2022). Work-FromHome (WFH): The constraints–coping–effectiveness framework.

Personnel Review, 51(8), 1883–1901. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2022-0072

Ahmed, U., Yong, I. S.-C., Pahi, M. H., & Dakhan, S. A. (2022). Does meaningful work encompass support towards supervisory, worker and engagement relationship? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3704–3723. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2020-0321

Al Badi, F. M., Cherian, J., Farouk, S., & Al Nahyan, M. (2023). work engagement and job performance among nurses in the public healthcare sector in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 17(5), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-06-2022-0216

Albion, M. J. (2004). A measure of attitudes towards flexible work options. Australian Journal of Management, 29(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620402900207

Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774

Andrulli, R., & Gerards, R. (2023). How new ways of working during COVID-19 affect employee well-being via technostress, need for recovery, and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107560

Beauregard, A., Basile, K., & Canonico, E. (2013). Home is where the work is: A new study of homeworking in Acas–and beyond. (Acas Research Paper. 10/13). Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259053477_Home_is_where_the_work_is_A_new_study_of_homeworking_in_Acas_-_and_beyond

Benitez, J., Ruiz, L., & Popovic, A. (2022). Impact of mobile technologyenabled HR gamification on employee performance: An empirical

investigation. Information & Management, 59(4), 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103647

Boulet, M., & Parent-Lamarche, A. (2022). Workers’ well-being and job performance in the context of COVID-19: A sector-specific approach. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 11(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-07-2021-0139

Breaugh, J. A., & Frye, N. K. (2008). Work–family conflict: The importance of family-friendly employment practices and family-supportive supervisors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9081-1

Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 35–70). Jossey-Bass.

Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., & Tramontano, C. (2022). “It needs to be the right blend”: A qualitative exploration of remote e-workers’ experience and well-being at work. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(2), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-

-2021-0058

Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, D., & Alessio, I. (2022). Work from anywhere and employee psychological well-being: Moderating role of HR leadership support. Personnel Review, 51(8), 1967–1989. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2022-0086

Chu, A. M. Y., Chan, T. W. C., & So, M. K. P. (2022). Learning from work-from-home issues during the COVID-19 pandemic: Balance speaks louder than words. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0261969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261969

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Dajani, M. A. Z. (2015). The impact of employee engagement on job performance and organisational commitment in the Egyptian banking sector. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 3(5), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.12691/jbms-3-5-1

Delle-Vergini, S. (2017). The effect of flexible work arrangements on employee intent to stay. (Master’s thesis, University of Northampton). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22301.13284

Eastern Economic Corridor Office of Thailand. (2023). EEC Thailand. https://image.mfa.go.th/mfa/0/Svp1QKEi4u/EEC/EEC_Fact_Sheet_2023.pdf

Farooq, R., & Sultana, A. (2022). The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work from home and employee productivity. Measuring Business Excellence, 26(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-12-2020-0173

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Garg, N., & Singh, P. (2020). Work engagement as a mediator between subjective well-being and work-and-health outcomes. Management

Research Review, 43(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2019-0143

George, T. M., Okwu, E., & Ogunbodede, K. F. (2022). Digital literacy and job performance of librarians in Rivers State University

Libraries, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360079899

Gerards, R., de Grip, A., & Baudewijns, C. (2018). Do new ways of working increase work engagement? Personnel Review, 47(2), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050

Gordon, S., Tang, C.-H., Day, J., & Adler, H. (2019). Supervisor support and turnover in hotels: Does subjective well-being mediate the relationship? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0565

Greenhaus, J. H., Ziegert, J. C., & Allen, T. D. (2012). When family-supportive supervision matters: Relations between multiple sources of support and work–family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.10.008

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010).

Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hammig, O. (2017). Health and well-being at work: The key role of

supervisor support. SSM - Population Health, 3, 393–402. https://

doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.04.002

Hamouche, S., & Parent-Lamarche, A. (2023). Teleworkers’ job performance: A study examining the role of age as an important diversity component of companies’ workforce. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 10(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2022-0057

Hamzah, H., Nordin, N. S., Dwiyanti, R., Na’imah, T., & Mawi, N. (2021). The role of well-being, supervisor support and positive feedback on lecturers’ work engagement. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 16(1), 73–84. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/245504

Hashmi, M. A., Al Ghaithi, A., & Sartawi, K. (2021). Impact of flexible work arrangements on employees’ perceived productivity, organisational commitment and perceived work quality: A United Arab Emirates case-study. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(2), 332–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-10-2020-0130

Hidayah Ibrahim, S. N., Suan, C. L., & Karatepe, O. M. (2019). The effects of supervisor support and self-efficacy on call center employees’ work engagement and quitting intentions. International Journal of Manpower, 40(4), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-12-2017-0320

Imam, H., Sahi, A., & Farasat, M. (2022). The roles of supervisor support, employee engagement and internal communication in performance: A social exchange perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2022-0102

Jang, S. J. (2009). The relationships of flexible work schedules, workplace support, supervisory support, work-life balance, and the well-being of working parents. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488370802678561

Jena, L. K., Pradhan, S., & Panigrahy, N. P. (2018). Pursuit of organisational trust: Role of employee engagement, psychological well-being and transformational leadership. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.11.001

Jung, H.-S., & Yoon, H.-H. (2021). Generational effects of workplace flexibility on work engagement, satisfaction, and commitment in South Korean deluxe hotels. Sustainability, 13(16), 9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169143

Karani, A., Mall, S., Deshpande, R., & Jayswal, M. (2023). Impact of psychological contract breach on innovative behaviour and wellbeing amongst academicians during COVID-19. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(1/2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2022-0023

Karani, A., & Mehta, S. A. (2022). “I am OK when you are with me” – Understanding the well-being and innovative behavior in the digitized workspace. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(5/6), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2021-0127

Kiran, M., & Khurram, S. (2018). Flexitime and employee happiness at workplace: A quantitative study of software houses. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(3), 1008–1024. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/193457/1/4325.pdf

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Lee, T. C., Peng, M. Y.-P., Wang, L., & Hung, H. K. (2021). Factors influencing employees’ subjective wellbeing and job performance during the COVID-19 global pandemic: The perspective of social cognitive career theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 577028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.577028

Magnier-Watanabe, R., Uchida, T., Orsini, P., & Benton, C. F. (2020). Organizational virtuousness, subjective well-being, and job

performance: Comparing employees in France and Japan. AsiaPacific Journal of Business Administration, 12(2), 115–138. https://

doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-10-2019-0210

Manion, J. (2003). Joy at work!: Creating a positive workplace. Journal of Nursing Administration, 33(12), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200312000-00008

Marsh, E. (2018). Understanding the effect of digital literacy on employees’ digital workplace continuance intentions and individual performance. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 9(2), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.

McCarthy, A., Cleveland, J. N., Hunter, S., Darcy, C., & Grady, G. (2013). Employee work–life balance outcomes in Ireland: A multilevel investigation of supervisory support and perceived organizational support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.709189

McNamara, T. K., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Brown, M., & Matz-Costa, C.

(2012). Access to and utilization of flexible work options. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy Society, 51(4), 936–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2012.00703.x

Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.695

Miller, K. (2006). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes (4th ed.). Wadsworth.

Nabawanuka, H., & Ekmekcioglu, E. B. (2022). Millennials in the workplace: Perceived supervisor support, work–life balance and employee well–being. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2021-0041

National Innovation Agency. (2022). Future of Work. https://nia.or.th/pdf/books/Future%20of%20WORK.pdf

Pataki-Bittó, F., & Kun, Á. (2022). Exploring differences in the subjective well-being of teleworkers prior to and during the pandemic. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 15(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-12-2020-0207

Piotrowski, A., Rawat, S., & Boe, O. (2021). Effects of organizational support and organizational justice on police officers’ work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642155

Rahman, M. F. W., Kistyanto, A., & Surjanti, J. (2020). Flexible work arrangements in COVID-19 pandemic era, influence employee performance: The mediating role of innovative work behavior. International Journal of Management, Innovation Entrepreneurial Research, 6(2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijmier.2020.622

Ramakrishnan, S., & Arokiasamy, L. (2020). Flexible working arrangements in Malaysia; A study of employee’s performance on white collar employees. Global Business and Management Research, 11(1), 551–559. https://www.proquest.com/scholarlyjournals/flexible-working-arrangements-malaysia-study/

docview/2236125482/se-2

Richman, A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Hill, J. E., & Brennan, R. T. (2008). The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work-life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community, Work & Family, 11, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802050350

Roy, I., Arefin, M. S., & Rahman, M. S. (2023). How do work–life support practices impact bank employees’ subjective well-being? Personnel Review, 52(3), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2021-0050

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Scrimpshire, A. J., Edwards, B. D., Crosby, D., & Anderson, S. J. (2023). Investigating the effects of high-involvement climate and public service motivation on engagement, performance, and meaningfulness in the public sector. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 38(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2021-0158

Sekhar, C., & Patwardhan, M. (2021). Flexible working arrangement and job performance: The mediating role of supervisor support. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(5), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2020-0396

Shah, M. W., Khattak, P., & Shah, M. H. (2020). The impact of flexible working hours and psychological empowerment on team performance with the mediating role of work engagement. British Journal of Research, 7(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.36648/2394-3718.7.1.49

Sharma, P. K., & Kumra, R. (2022). Examining the mediating role of work engagement on the relationship between workplace mindfulness and organizational justice and its association with wellbeing. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 11(2), 129–148.

https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-10-2019-0184

Subramaniam, A. G., Overton, B. J., & Maniam, C. B. (2015). Flexible working arrangements, work life balance and women in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science Humanity, 5(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2015.V5.417

Talukder, A. K. M. M. H., & Galang, M. C. (2021). Supervisor support for employee performance in Australia: Mediating role of work-life balance, job, and life attitude. Journal of Employment Counseling, 58(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12154

Ter Hoeven, C. L., & Van Zoonen, W. (2015). Flexible work designs and employee well-being: Examining the effects of resources and demands. New Technology, Work Employment, 30(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12052

Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6

Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1681

Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2021). Overall job performance, remote work engagement, living with children, and remote work productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Psychology Open, 80(3), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000015

Sutarto, A. P., Wardaningsih, S., & Putri, W. H. (2021). Work from home: Indonesian employees’ mental well-being and productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(4), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-08-2020-0152

Vuong, B. N., Tushar, H., & Hossain, S. F. A. (2022). The effect of social support on job performance through organizational commitment and innovative work behavior: Does innovative climate matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(5), 832–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2021-0256

Weideman, M., & Hofmeyr, K. B. (2020). The influence of flexible work arrangements on employee engagement: An exploratory study. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1209

Wood, A. J., & Burchell, B. J. (2014). Zero hours contracts as a source of job insecurity amongst low-paid hourly workers. University of Cambridge. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f115e386-543b-4608- b818-0f3c1dcd4dc4

Yamin, R. A., & Pusparini, E. (2022). The effect of flexible work arrangement and perceived organizational support on employee job performance: the mediating role of employee engagement. Proceedings of the 6th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2021), 220, 436–441. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220701.081

Zeb, A., Goh, G. G. G., Javaid, M., Khan, M. N., Khan, A. U., & Gul, S. (2022). The interplay between supervisor support and job performance: Implications of social exchange and social learning theories. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(2), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-04-2021-0143

Downloads

Published

07-11-2025

How to Cite

Panitada Limrueangrong, & Jutamard Thaweepaiboonwong. (2025). The role of flexible work arrangements and supervisor support on task performance in the manufacturing sector in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(3), 460335. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/284659

Issue

Section

Research articles