The Use of Hedging Devices in Scientific Research Report Writing: A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Graduate and Undergraduate Students in Social Sciences at a University in Thailand

Authors

  • Pirakorn Seekhem Naresuan University
  • Sopit Jenpradab Naresuan University
  • Sarunya Tarat Naresuan University
  • Thareerat Suniphan Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Discourse Analysis, English for Academic Purposes Hedging in Academic Writing, English Writing Proficiency Levels

Abstract

  Due to the importance of English as an international language in many academic fields, academic writers who aim to publish their work and gain acceptance in the international academic community often try to apply language devices that help them reach the expectations of the discourse community. Among other frequently used devices, academic writers employ hedges to express their claims or arguments in a tentative manner to show their politeness. This paper presents a preliminary study on the use of hedging devices by two groups of students across different academic levels. The two corpora consisted of discussion/conclusion sections of 15 theses written by the graduates and undergraduates in social sciences of  a university. With the taxonomy of hedges proposed by Hyland (1998) as the analytical framework, the findings revealed that, regarding the frequencies of overall hedging devices (research question 1), the lower-level writers in this study tended to hedge more frequently. Involving the pattern of hedging categories (research question 2), both groups were similar in terms of the most and the least frequently used hedging categories. However, concerning linguistic expressions of hedging devices (research question 3), the upper-level writers tended to use more various hedging expressions.  

References

Abdollahzadeh, E. (2019, January). A Cross-cultural Study of Hedging in Discussion Sections by Junior and Senior Academic Writers. Ibérica 38, 177-202.

Akbas, E., &Hardman, J. (2018, August). Strengthening or Weakening Claims in Academic Knowledge Construction: A Comparative Study of Hedges and Boosters in Postgraduate Academic Writing. Educational Sciences: Theory &Practice, 18(4), 831–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0260.

Almakrob, A. Y. (2020, October). Native Versus Nonnative English Writers’ Use of Hedging in Linguistics Dissertations. Asian EFL Journal, 27(4.4), 360–381.

Aull, L., L., &Lancaster, Z. (2014, March-April). Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing. Written Communication, 31(2), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055.

Brown, P., &Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Chen, C., &Jun Zhang, L. (2017, May). An Intercultural Analysis of The Use of Hedging by Chinese and Anglophone Academic English Writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-2009.

Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in Academic Writing: Some Theoretical Problem. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271-287.

Demir, C. (2018, July-September). Hedging and Academic Writing: an Analysis of Lexical Hedges. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 74-92.

Gee, J., P., &Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068.

Hinkel, E. (2002). Second Language Writers' Text: Linguistic and Rhetorical Features. Mahwah & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

______. (2005). Hedging, Inflating, and Persuading. Applied Language Learning, 15(1&2), 29-53.

Holmes, J. (1982, December). Expressing Doubt and Certainty in English. RELC Journal 13(2), 9-28.

______. (1990, July-September). Hedges and Boosters in Women's and Men's Speech. Language & Communication, 10(3), 185-205.

Hyland, K. (1994, July). Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3.

______. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54.

Nguyen Thi Thuy, T. (2018, April). A Corpus-Based Study on Cross-Cultural Divergence in The Use of Hedges in Academic Research Articles Written by Vietnamese and Native English-speaking Authors. Social Sciences, 7(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040070.

Saville-Troike, M., &Barto, K. (2017). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Takimoto, M. (2015, July). A Corpus-Based Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in English Academic Articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 95-105.

Taymaz, N. (2021). A Corpus-Based Comparison of Use of Hedges and Boosters by Turkish ELT MA and PhD Students. Dilve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903302

Wu, B., &Paltridge, B. (2021). Stance Expressions in Academic Writing: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Chinese Students’ MA Dissertations and PhD Theses. Lingua, 253, 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Seekhem, P. ., Jenpradab, S., Tarat, S. ., & Suniphan, T. . (2024). The Use of Hedging Devices in Scientific Research Report Writing: A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Graduate and Undergraduate Students in Social Sciences at a University in Thailand. Lawarath Social E-Journal, 6(2), 87–104. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/lawarathjo/article/view/268678