The Establishment of Alternative Measures to the Detention of Children and the Non-Detention of Children in Thailand’s Immigration Detention Centers
Keywords:
Migration, Illegal migrant, Migrant children, Alternatives to Detention (ATD)Abstract
The article titled “Establishing Alternatives to Child Detention and the Non-Detention of Children in Immigration Detention Centers in Thailand” aims to examine child protection mechanisms in the context of migration, with a focus on children who accompany their parents into Thailand unlawfully and other vulnerable groups of children. Migration is a global phenomenon driven by economic factors, conflicts, and the search for new places of residence. As a result, many children are arrested and detained in immigration detention centers, which resemble prisons and are unsuitable for their physical and psychological development. Detention has long-term negative impacts on children’s cognitive, emotional, and social development, especially when they are separated from their families or guardians. The study finds that detaining children constitutes a violation of their fundamental rights, restricts access to essential welfare services, increases the financial burden on the state, and leads to overcrowding due to delays in the verification of personal status. Furthermore, it is inconsistent with Thailand’s obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which requires that the best interests of the child be a primary consideration, and it negatively affects the country’s human rights image. Therefore, the article proposes the use of Alternatives to Detention (ATD), including family-based care, the provision of appropriate temporary shelters, and the development of effective monitoring systems. These approaches aim to balance state security with the protection of human rights. Such measures are essential for ensuring non-discriminatory protection of migrant children and for achieving the sustainable abolition of child detention in accordance with international standards.
References
กรมกิจการเด็กและเยาวชน. (2563). คู่มือขั้นตอนการปฏิบัติงานที่เป็นมาตรฐานภายใต้บันทึกความเข้าใจ เรื่อง การกำหนดมาตรการและแนวทางแทนการกักตัวเด็กไว้ในสถานกักตัวคนต่างด้าวเพื่อรอการส่งกลับ. กรมกิจการเด็กและเยาวชน. https://asylumaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-mannual-of-SOP-MOU-ATD-TH-version.pdf
กรมกิจการเด็กและเยาวชน. (2565). คู่มือการปฏิบัติงานคุ้มครองเด็กโยกย้ายถิ่นฐาน. กรมกิจการเด็กและเยาวชน. https://www.unicef.org/thailand/media/9006/file/The%20migrant%20child%20protection%20operation%20manual%20for%20social%20workers.pdf
กนกนิษก์ ตัณฑ์กุลรัตน์ และ สุเทพ จันทร์อำพร. (2560). รายงานวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์ เรื่องมาตรการทางเลือกแทนการกักตัวผู้แสวงหาที่ลี้ภัยและผู้ลี้ภัยในเขตเมืองในประเทศไทย. เครือข่ายสิทธิผู้ลี้ภัยและคนไร้รัฐ. http://lms.nhrc.or.th/ulib/document/Fulltext/F09221.pdf
พระราชบัญญัติคนเข้าเมือง พ.ศ.2522. (1 มีนาคม 2522). ราชกิจจานุเษกษา. เล่มที่ 96 ตอนที่ 28 ฉบับพิเศษ หน้า 45. หน้า 1-29. https://www.royalthaipolice.go.th/downloads/laws/laws_07.pdf
มาตาลักษณ์ เสรเมธากุล. (2562). โครงการวิจัย เรื่องหลักการคุ้มครองสิทธิเด็กภายใต้แนวคิดเกี่ยวกับประโยชน์สูงสุดของเด็ก. บริษัทโรงพิมพ์เดือนตุลา.
สำนักงานข้าหลวงใหญ่ผู้ลี้ภัยแห่งสหประชาชาติ. (ม.ป.ป.). อนุสัญญาว่าด้วยสถานภาพผู้ลี้ภัย ค.ศ. 1951. UNHCR ประเทศไทย. สืบค้นเมื่อวันที่ 11 ธันวาคม 2568. https://www.unhcr.org/th/1951-refugee-convention
องค์การทุนเพื่อเด็กแห่งสหประชาชาติ และ โรงเรียนนายร้อยตำรวจ. (2564). คู่มือขั้นตอนการปฏิบัติที่เป็นมาตรฐานในการคุ้มครองเด็กอพยพโยกย้ายถิ่นฐานของสำนักงานตรวจคนเข้าเมือง. องค์การยูนิเซฟ ประเทศไทย. https://www.unicef.org/thailand/media/9021/file/SoP%20of%20Migrant%20Child%20Protection%20for%20Immigration%20Bureau.pdf
องค์กรระหว่างประเทศเพื่อการโยกย้ายถิ่นฐาน. (2562). รายงานการย้ายถิ่นของประเทศไทย ฉบับปี 2562. บริษัท ไอเนอร์จี้ สตูดิโอ จำกัด.
Thai PBS. (2568). นร.ชายวัย 13 ใช้ชีวิตในไทยตั้งแต่ทารก ถูกจับ–อาจถูกส่งกลับกัมพูชา. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/news/content/355867
Aas, K. F., & Bosworth, M. (2013). The borders of punishment: Migration, citizenship, and social exclusion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669394.001.0001
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press.
Berlinghieri, M. (2021). A cross-country comparison on the right of refugees to family reunification: Eligibility and access of the procedure in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. [Master’s thesis, University of Padua]. Thesis and Dissertation Paua Arcive. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12608/1787
Betts, A., Loescher, G., & Milner, J. (2012). The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): The politics and practice of refugee protection (2nd edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203146651
Bloomfield, A. (2016). Alternatives to detention at a crossroads: Humanisation or criminalisation? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdv018
De Haas, H. (2025). Towards a global migration paradigm and the imperative of ridding ourselves of the ‘push-pull’ model. Comparative Migration Studies, 13, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00481-9
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361
Bateman, T., Goldson, B., Janes, L., & Willow, C. (2024). Why child imprisonment is beyond reform: A review of the evidence [Report]. University of Liverpool. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3194373/
Goodwin-Gill, G. S., & McAdam, J. (2007). The refugee in international law (3rd edition). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199207633.001.0001
International Labour Organization. (2022). Measuring labour migration in ASEAN: Analysis from the ILO’s International Labour Migration Statistics (ILMS) database. ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40asia/%40ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_839321.pdf
Jakuleviciene, L. (2018). Alternatives to immigration detention with particular focus on children. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 16(1), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol16.1.745
Kyaw, A. W. P. (2025). Navigating liminal legality: Vulnerabilities of urban refugees and asylum seekers in Thailand. Journal
of Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.59796/jcsh.v12i1.39-49
Lauterpacht, E., & Bethlehem, D. (2003). The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement. In E. Feller, V. Türk, & F. Nicholson (Eds.), Refugee protection in international law: UNHCR’s global consultations on international protection (pp. 87–177). Cambridge University Press.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063
Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology. McGraw-Hill.
McAuliffe, M., & Khadria, B. (2019). World migration report 2020. International Organization for Migration. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2020
Mitchell, L., & Kamenarac, O. (2022). Refugee children and families’ positioning within resettlement and early childhood education policies in Aotearoa New Zealand. KŌtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 17(2), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2021.1970584
New Zealand Immigration. (2022). Claiming refugee and protection status in New Zealand. Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/assets/inz/documents/forms-and-guides/claiming-refugee-and-protection-status-in-new-zealand-march-2021.pdf
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbt31
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2016). New York declaration for refugees and migrants. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/migration/new-york-declaration-refugees-and-migrants
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice: Original Edition. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9z6v
Sampson, R., & Mitchell, G. (2013). Global trends in immigration detention and alternatives to detention: Practical, political and symbolic rationales. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 1(3), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241300100302
Sampson, R., Mitchell, G., & Bowring, L. (2015). There are alternatives: A handbook for preventing unnecessary immigration detention (Revised edition). International Detention Coalition. https://idcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/There-Are-Alternatives-2015.pdf
Sykiotou, A. P. (2017). A study of immigration detention practices and the use of alternatives to immigration detention of children. Council of Europe. https://www.assembly.coe.int/LifeRay/MIG/EndImmigrationDetention/2017/2017-ImmigrationDetentionPracticesStudy-EN.pdf
The International Detention Coalition. (2022, March 15). IDC & ECDN welcomes launch of ATD pilot in Malaysia. https://idcoalition.org/ecdn-welcomes-launch-of-atd-pilot-in-malaysia/
United Nations. (1951). Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. United Nations.
United Nations. (1967). Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. United Nations.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations.
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2024). UNICEF annual report 2023. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/es/media/157491/file/UNICEF%20Annual%20report%202023%20EN.pdf
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General comment No. 14: The right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration. United Nations.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2017). Joint general comment No. 4/23 on State obligations regarding the human rights of children in the context of international migration. United Nations.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2012). Detention guidelines: Guidelines on the applicable criteria and standards relating to the detention of asylum-seekers and alternatives to detention. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/media/unhcr-detention-guidelines
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (n.d.). Refugee data finder. Retrieved 2025, 11 December. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2014). Beyond detention: A global strategy to support governments to end the detention of asylum-seekers and refugees 2014–2019. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/media/beyond-detention-global-strategy-support-governments-end-detention-asylum-seekers-and
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2019, January 21). UNHCR welcomes royal Thai government’s commitment to release of detained children in Thailand. https://www.unhcr.org/th/en/news/unhcr-welcomes-royal-thai-government-s-commitment-release-detained-children
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2024). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2023. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2023
Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Social Work and Social Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The manuscripts published in the Social Work Journal is the copyright of the Social Work Journal, Thammasat University
Any article or opinion appeared in the Social Work Journal will solely be under the responsibility of the author The Faculty of Social Administration, Thammasat University and the editors do not need to reach in agreement or hold any responsibility.