The Importance of Proper Collection of Quantifiers to Test for Viruses with Rapid COVID-19 Test Kits
Keywords:
COVID-19, rapid COVID-19 testing, collecting the secretionsAbstract
Investigating the virus with rapid COVID-19 testing kits is the most widely practiced method today to identify an infected person and to take further action in treating and controlling the outbreak. However, the less-understood issue is whether the people properly collect the secretions. There are test kits that suggest secretion storage at different locations and the assays that are recommended for collection of secretions at different locations and widely available in the market are similar or different in each, especially with regard to efficacy. In addition, there are still many of questions that do not have clear answers. This review article addresses the aforementioned issues to raise questions for society and researchers to create answers for humanity.
References
Farhadi N. (2021). Can we rely on COVID-19 data? An assessment of data from over 200 countries worldwide. Science progress, 104(2), 368504211021232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211021232
Chaimayo, C., Kaewnaphan, B., Tanlieng, N., Athipanyasilp, N., Sirijatuphat, R., Chayakulkeeree, M., Angkasekwinai, N., Sutthent, R., Puangpunngam, N., Tharmviboonsri, T., Pongraweewan, O., Chuthapisith, S., Sirivatanauksorn, Y., Kantakamalakul, W., & Horthongkham, N. (2020). Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand. Virology journal, 17(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5
Allan-Blitz, L. T., & Klausner, J. D. (2021). A Real-World Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Testing versus PCR Testing in Florida. Journal of clinical microbiology, 59(10), e0110721. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01107-21
Homza, M., Zelena, H., Janosek, J., Tomaskova, H., Jezo, E., Kloudova, A., Mrazek, J., Svagera, Z., & Prymula, R. (2021). Covid-19 antigen testing: better than we know? A test accuracy study. Infectious diseases (London, England), 53(9), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2021.1914857
Wang, Y. H., Wu, C. C., Bai, C. H., Lu, S. C., Yang, Y. P., Lin, Y. Y., Lai, W. Y., Lin, T. W., Jheng, Y. C., Lee, M. C., & Chen, C. C. (2021). Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 antigen tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 84(11), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000626
Zedtwitz-Liebenstein K. (2021). Correctly performed nasal swabs. Infection, 49(4), 763–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01607-8
Föh, B., Borsche, M., Balck, A., Taube, S., Rupp, J., Klein, C., & Katalinic, A. (2021). Complications of nasal and pharyngeal swabs: a relevant challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic?. The European respiratory journal, 57(4), 2004004. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.04004-2020
Lee, R. A., Herigon, J. C., Benedetti, A., Pollock, N. R., & Denkinger, C. M. (2021). Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of clinical microbiology, 59(5), e02881-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02881-20
Tsang, N., So, H. C., Ng, K. Y., Cowling, B. J., Leung, G. M., & Ip, D. (2021). Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 21(9), 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8
Klein, J., Krüger, L. J., Tobian, F., Gaeddert, M., Lainati, F., Schnitzler, P., Lindner, A. K., Nikolai, O., Knorr, B., Welker, A., de Vos, M., Sacks, J. A., Escadafal, C., Denkinger, C. M., & Study Team (2021). Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test. Medical microbiology and immunology, 210(4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9
Boum, Y., Eyangoh, S., & Okomo, M. C. (2021). Beyond COVID-19-will self-sampling and testing become the norm?. The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 21(9), 1194–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00197-3
Burns, P. B., & Chung, K. C. (2010). Developing good clinical questions and finding the best evidence to answer those questions. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 126(2), 613–618. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24a7
Aslam, S., & Emmanuel, P. (2010). Formulating a researchable question: A critical step for facilitating good clinical research. Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS, 31(1), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.69003
Poowaruttanawiwit, P., Srihirun, J., Chantim, C., Sirilak, S., & Chitnok, W. (in press). Research and development of a device for nasopharyngeal swabs for rapid testing of the novel coronavirus. Thai Journal of. Pharmacy Practice
Poowaruttanawiwit, P., Srisingh, K., & Chantim, C. (in press). Development of nasopharyngeal secretion collection tool. Thai Journal of. Pharmacy Practice
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Research and Development Institute of Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการปรับปรุงแก้ไขตัวอักษรและค่าสะกดต่าง ๆ ที่ไม่ถูกต้อง และต้นฉบับที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารเทคโนโลยีและนวัตกรรม ถือเป็นกรรมสิทธิ์ของสถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลล้านนา และผลการพิจารณาคัดเลือกบทความตีพิมพ์ในวารสารให้ถือเป็นมติของกองบรรณาธิการเป็นที่สิ้นสุด
