The Ditransitive Construction of the Synonyms ‘Give’, ‘Offer’, and ‘Provide’: A Corpus-Based Study of Twenty English Varieties

Main Article Content

Kanokwan Phongpanya
Natcha Khamhaengrit
Atikhom Thienthong

Abstract

While synonymy has been extensively studied, few studies have examined the ditransitive construction of synonyms across English varieties. Informed by construction grammar viewing pattern-meaning combinations as constructions and using a 1.9-billion-word corpus of texts from 20 countries, this article analyzes four different ways of expressing ditransitivity by the synonyms give, offer, and provide, which share the core sense of ‘giving’. This analysis enables the exploration of syntactic variation between standard and variant patterns across 20 English varieties. The results show that the double-object pattern (e.g., give me a book) is preferred over its prepositional variants (e.g., give a book to me); while this pattern is standard for give and offer, it is not true of provide. As regards the varieties, ditransitive patterns are similar across the synonyms, except provide which alternates frequently among four syntactic variants across the varieties. The cluster analyses also show that, despite belonging to the same concentric circle, the varieties differ in the ditransitive patterns of the synonyms. Overall, the results demonstrate that semantic similarity tends to contribute more to syntactic frames than regional factors. This article offers several implications for teaching synonymy and ditransitivity from constructional and World Englishes perspectives.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phongpanya, K., Khamhaengrit, N., & Thienthong, A. (2025). The Ditransitive Construction of the Synonyms ‘Give’, ‘Offer’, and ‘Provide’: A Corpus-Based Study of Twenty English Varieties. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 893–918. https://doi.org/10.70730/DJJR9155
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Kanokwan Phongpanya, English and Communication Program, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University

A senior undergraduate student in English and Communication Program, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand, when this study was conducted. Her research interests include language change and variation.

Natcha Khamhaengrit, English and Communication Program, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University

A senior undergraduate student in English and Communication Program, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand, when this study was conducted. Her research interests include language change and variation.

Atikhom Thienthong, English and Communication Program, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University

An assistant professor at English and Communication Program, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand. His main research interests include academic writing, collocation, synonymy, construction grammar, and corpora.

References

Bergs, A. (2010). Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: A Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000067

Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. M. Krämer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 1-33). Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Collins. (n.d.). Offer. In collinsdictionary.com dictionary. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/offer

Collins, P. (2023). Modals and quasi-modals in English world-wide. Journal of English Linguistics, 51(3), 265-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231173720

Crowther, D., Kim, S., Lee, J., Lim, J., & Loewen, S. (2021). Methodological synthesis of cluster analysis in second language research. Language Learning, 71(1), 99-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12428

Davies, M. (n.d.-a). Corpus of global web-based English. English-Corpora. https://www.english-corpora.org/glowbe/.

Davies, M. (n.d.-b). Corpus design and overview. English-Corpora. https://www.english-corpora.org/glowbe_corpus.asp

Davies, M., & Fuchs, R. (2015). Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav

De Clerck, B., Delorge, M., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2011). Semantic and pragmatic motivations for constructional preferences: A corpus-based study of Provide, Supply, and Present. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(4), 359-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211421346

Diessel, H. (2023). The constructicon: Taxonomies and networks. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009327848

Engel, A., Grafmiller, J., Rosseel, L., Szmrecsanyi, B., & Van de Velde, F. (2021). How register-specific is probabilistic grammatical knowledge?: A programmatic sketch and a case study on the dative alternation with give. In E. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp. 51-84). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.03eng

Friedrich, P., & Figueiredo, E. H. D. (2016). The sociolinguistics of digital Englishes. Routledge.

Fuchs, R. (2016). The frequency of the present perfect in varieties of English around the world. In V. Werner, E. Seoane, & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect (pp. 223-258). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443530-011

Gerwin, J. (2013). Give it me!: Pronominal ditransitives in English dialects. English Language & Linguistics, 17(3), 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000117

Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.

Grabe, W. (1984). Written discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001835

Herbst, T. (2014). The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst, H-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns (pp. 167-216). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.167

Hovav, M. R., & Levin, B. (2008). The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 129-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004975

Hunston, S. (2002). Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 167-183). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hunston, S., & Su, H. (2019). Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of ‘Evaluation’. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 567-593. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx046

Kachru, B. B. (2005). Asian Englishes: Beyond the canon. Hong Kong University Press.

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (n.d.-a). Give. In idoceonline.com dictionary. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/give

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (n.d.-b). Offer. In idoceonline.com dictionary. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from

https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/offer

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (n.d.-c). Provide. In idoceonline.com dictionary. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide

Mukherjee, J. (2001). Principles of pattern selection: A corpus-based case study. Journal of English Linguistics, 29(4), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754240122005459

Mukherjee, J. (2005). English ditransitive verbs: Aspects of theory, description and a usage-based model. Rodopi.

Mukherjee, J., & Schilk, M. (2012). Exploring variation and change in New Englishes: Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English (pp. 189-199). Oxford University Press.

Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonyms, synonyms, and other paradigms. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (n.d.-a). Give. In oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/give_1?q=give

Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (n.d.-b). Offer. In oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/offer_1?q=offer

Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (n.d.-c). Provide. In oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/provide?q=provide

Phoocharoensil, S., & Kanokpermpoon, M. (2021). Distinguishing the near-synonyms ‘increase’ and ‘rise’: Genre and collocation investigation. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(4), 968-975.

https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.4.34

Ranta, E. (2022). From learners to users – Errors, innovations, and universals. ELT Journal, 76(3), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac024

Seyranyan, S., & Westphal, M. (2021). Attitudes of Armenian and German students toward British English, American English, and their own Englishes. English Today, 37(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000543

Thienthong, A. (2020). Bilingual dictionary synonyms for paraphrasing: A solution or a problem? International Journal of Lexicography, 33(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecz025

Yi, E., Koenig, J.-P., & Roland, D. (2019). Semantic similarity to high-frequency verbs affects syntactic frame selection. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(3), 601-628. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0029

Zehentner, E. (2017). Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialisation and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language & Linguistics, 22(1), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000447