Gender and Situational Variation of Pitch Dynamism in Thai Speakers
Keywords:
F0, pitch dynamism, gender variation, situational contexts, Thai languageAbstract
Human physiology confirms that male and female voices exhibit different fundamental frequencies (F0) intrinsically. However, whether the use of F0 in everyday speech differs between males and females remains contentious. Perceptually, female speech is often considered more fluctuating, swoopy, and melodic compared to male speech. This study aims to investigate this issue by revisiting methods of measuring F0 in utterances to determine whether the differences between male and female speakers mentioned above exist. Pitch dynamism, defined as a two-dimensional value (x, y) comprising pitch perturbation and pitch variance, has been selected as the acoustic variable. Additionally, this study examines the influence of situational context on utterance F0. Recordings were collected from six native Thai students (three males and three females), involving both reading speech and spontaneous speech. The results indicate a significant difference in utterance F0 between male and female speakers, with pitch variance serving as the primary distinguishing cue. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that situational context significantly affects the realization of utterance F0.
References
Abramson, A. S., Fischer-Jørgensen, E., Rischel, J., & Thorsen, N. (1979). Lexical tone and sentence prosody in Thai. Haskins laboratories: Status Report on Speech Research SR-59, 60, 153-160.
Aronovitch, C. D. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. The Journal of Social Psychology, 99(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1976.9924774
Austin, W. M. (1965). Some social aspects of paralanguage. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 11(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100005703
Brinckmann, C., & Benzmüller, R. (Eds.). (1999). Proceedings, Sixth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH'99), Budapest, Hungary, September 5-9, 1999. https://ids-pub.bszbw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6860
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.13. http://www.praat.org/
Childers, D. G., & Wu, K. (1991). Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical society of America, 90(4), 1841-1856. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401664
Corey, R. M., Jones, U., & Singer, A. C. (2020). Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(4), 2371-2375. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002279
Crystal, D. (1975). The English tone of voice: Essays in intonation, prosody and paralanguage. Hodder & Stoughton Educational.
Eady, S. J. (1982). Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language. Language and Speech, 25(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500103
Eble, C. C. (1972). How the speech of some is more equal than others. Paper presented at Southeastern Conference on Linguistics. In Annotated Bibliography, B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance, p. 246. Newbury House, Rowley.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003) Language and gender. Cambridge University Press. Fuchs, R. (2018). Pitch range, dynamism and level in postcolonial varieties of English: A comparison of Educated Indian English and British English. Proceedings of the 9 th Speech Prosody, 893-897. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-180
Gósy, M., & Terken, J. (1994). Question marking in Hungarian: Timing and height of pitch peaks. Journal of Phonetics, 22(3), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30204-9
Henton, C. (1995). Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language & Communication, 15(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)00011-Z
Hirano, M. (1983). The structure of vocal folds. In I. R. Titze (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1699-1707.
Jongsukkijpanich, P. (2021, N.D.). Portfolio. Gena Jongsukkijpanich https://genajong.portfolio.site/
Kahane, J. (1978). A morphological study of the human prepubertal and pubertal larynx. In I. R. Titze (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1699-1707.
Luksaneeyanawin, S. (1998). Intonation in Thai. (D. Hirst and A. D. Christo, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Naksakul, K. (2016). The sound system of Thai language [ระบบเสี ยงภาษาไทย]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Arts Academic Dissemination Project.
Ohala, J. J. (1984). An Ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261706
Pellowe, J., & Jones, V. (1978). On intonational variability in Tyneside speech. (P. Trudgil, Ed.). Arnold. Sicoli, M. A., Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Marked initial pitch in questions signals marked communicative function. Language and Speech, 58(2), 204-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914529247
Simpson, P. A. (2009). Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(2), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00125.x
Snidecor, J. C. (1951). The pitch and duration characteristics of superior female speakers during oral reading. Journal of Speech and Hearing disorders, 16(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.1601.44
Sun, J., Lu, J., Li, A., & Jia, Y. (2008). The pitch analysis of imperative sentences in Standard Chinese. In 2008 6th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Tielen, M. T. (1989). Fundamental frequency characteristics of middle aged men and women. Proceeds of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences Amsterdam, 13, 49-58.
Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1699-1707. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397959
Toscano, J. C., & Toscano, C. M. (2021). Effects of face masks on speech recognition in multi-talker environments. PLoS ONE, 16(2): e0246842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246842
Uldall, E. (1972). Dimensions of meaning in intonation. In Readings in modern linguistics: An anthology (pp. 232-239). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820041-015
Woods, N. (Eds.) (1992). Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech, August 5-12, 1992. University of Pennsylvania.
Wu, K., & Childers, D. G. (1991). Gender recognition from speech. Part I: Coarse analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(4), 1828-1840. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401663
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript, the author transfers the copyright for the article to School of Language and Communication, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Though the journal is an open-access, reproduction of any material published in NIDA Journal of Language and Communication for non-personal and/or commercial purpose requires a written permission from School of Language and Communication, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA).
